Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:03:15.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Australian Rain-forest Subdivisions and Conservation Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Paul K. Parker
Paul K. Parker
Affiliation:
Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The subdivision of Australian tropical rain-forest into one- and two-hectares' residential blocks changes the local ecology in a dramatic manner. It opens the canopy, changes the humidity regime, decimates ancient climax vegetation, and introduces weed species. As a result, the practice is incompatible with the objectives alike of the World Conservation Strategy and the National Conservation Strategy for Australia. Government intervention will be required if the Strategy is to be implemented. The first step towards implementation is the evaluation of current and proposed practices. A brief analysis of the incidence of costs and benefits demonstrates the skewed distribution which results from rain-forest subdivision. A few sellers and promoters receive millions of dollars in capital gains, while millions of other people lose the public and recreational benefits offered by the existing rain-forest, and the world as a whole loses much of scientific value. The information gained by this brief analysis provides the Government with a better basis on which to act than heretofore.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , Spring 1987 , pp. 37 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australia: Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment (1984). A National Conservation Strategy for Australia: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, Proposed by a Conference held in Canberra in June 1983, Second edition. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia: ii + 61 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1986). Environmental Issues and Usage of National Parks, Australia. Catalogue No. 4115.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia: 7 pp.Google Scholar
Farnworth, E.G., Tidrick, T.H., Smathers, W.M. & Jordan, C.F. (1983). A synthesis of ecological and economic theory toward more complete valuation of tropical moist forests. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 21, pp. 11–28, 3 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleetwood, R., Means, K. & Stannard, M. (1984). An attempt to resolve rainforest conservation and development conflicts north of Daintree. Pp. 644–53, 3 figs, in Australian National Rainforests Study Report, Vol. 1 (Eds Werren, G. & Kershaw, P.). World Wildlife Fund/Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne, Australia: iv + 667 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Frawley, K. (1984). Rainforest management in Queensland: a brief history. Heritage Newsletter, 7(4), pp. 3–5, 3 figs.Google Scholar
House, S. (1985). Australian Rainforests: What is Their Value? CRES Working Paper 1985/22, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia: ii + 6 pp.Google Scholar
Munro, D. (1983). What is an NCS? IUCN Bulletin, 14(4–6), pp. 47–51.Google Scholar
Parker, P.K. (1986). Selling the Daintree: Rainforest for Public or Private Benefit? CRES Working Paper 1986/11, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia: ii + 37 pp., 5 figs.Google Scholar
Parker, P. & Callahan, S. (in press). Daintree: rain-forest or real estate? Australian Habitat.Google Scholar
Quaid Real Estate Pty (1985). Welcome to Daintree. Quaid Real Estate Pty Ltd, Cairns, Australia: 2 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rainforest Conservation Society of Queensland (1984). A Study of the Conservation Significance of the Wet Tropics of North-east Queensland: A Report to Australian Heritage Commission. Bardon, Queensland, Australia: ix + 215 pp., illustr., 4 maps.Google Scholar
Rainforest Information and Research Group (1985). A Review of ‘Rainforest Conservation in Australia: A Report to the Minister of Arts, Heritage and Environment’. CRES Working Paper 1985/24, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia: iv + 71 pp.Google Scholar
Russell, R. (1985). Daintree: Where the Rainforest Meets the Reef. Kevin Weldon and the Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne, Australia: iv + 249 pp., illustr., 1 map.Google Scholar
Webb, L.J. & Tracey, J.G. (1981). Australian Rainforests: patterns and change. Pp. 605–94 in Ecological Biogeography of Australia, Vol. 1 (Ed. Keast, A.). W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands: xix + 805 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wilderness Society and Australian Conservation Foundation (1985). The Wet Tropics: World Heritage Rainforests at Risk. Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne, Australia: ii + 16 pp.Google Scholar
Winter, W.J., Bell, F.C., Pahl, L.I. & Atherton, R.G. (1984). The distribution of rainforest in northeast Queensland. Pp. 145–54, 6 figs, in Australian National Rainforests Study Report, Vol. 1 (Eds Werren, G. & Kershaw, P.). World Wildlife Fund/Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne, Australia: iv + 667 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Working Group on Rainforest Conservation (1985). Rainforest Conservation in Australia: A Report to the Hon. Barry Cohen M.P., Minister for Arts, Heritage and Environment. Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment, Canberra, Australia: 09, v + 141 pp., 7 figs.Google Scholar