Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T10:26:08.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced Oil-recovery and Its Environmental and Economic Implications in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Douglas Argyle Campbell
Affiliation:
President, D.A. Campbell Company Inc., 1150 Brooklawn Drive, Los Angeles, California 90024, U.S.A.

Extract

This survey has described the foreseeable environmental and economic impacts of enhanced oil-recovery (EOR) on U.S. oil production between 1980 and 2000. It has indicated that EOR production may be expected to rise from the approximately 4% of total U.S. oil production in 1980, to the projected approximations of 10.5% in 1985, 18.5% in 1990, 23% in 1995, and perhaps 30% in 2000. These percentages are substantial, particularly as this form of oil production has been, up until recently, quite limited. Many of the processes are still in the laboratory stage of development—particularly chemical and microbiological processes. With continued laboratory experimentation and field research, it is possible that the percentages could be even greater than the above suggestions as we reach into the 21st Century.

The potential for EOR is very considerable and probably great, as it could involve some two-thirds of all the oil already identified in the United States and assumed to be unrecoverable by primary or secondary means. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has given important incentives to the EOR industry to make such increased production worth while through raising prices to compensate for the cost of equipment, and deducting expenditure on such equipment from a new ‘Windfall Profit Tax’.

Along with EOR's economic potential, there are two major ecological dangers: air pollution through thermal processes, and ground-water pollution through chemical processes. It is essential to the well-being of the United States that clean air standards be adhered to, and that the equipment necessary to purify the air (particularly in California) be available and operate to reduce emissions.

A great deal more research needs to be undertaken towards developing safeguards to ensure that drinkingwater is not contaminated by dangerous chemicals which may be used in ‘chemical flooding’ of depleted oil-wells. Many of these chemicals have merely ‘come out of the laboratory’ and are sold by chemical companies without sufficient field-testing. How far these chemicals could travel underground must still be determined. It is also important to ensure that carbon dioxide, fed into a geological formation, can be recaptured and re-injected without escaping into the atmosphere, where there is the potential danger of a global ‘greenhouse effect’ upon the world's temperature. Finally, it is important to safeguard the Earth against microbes which could be injected into its geological strata without sufficient knowledge of their impact on the ecology of the Earth. Thus, much environmental research will be called for with these new methods of producing oil for Man's use.

This study has reviewed the four major methods of EOR that are currently being utilized or proposed— thermal processes, miscible and semi-miscible processes, chemical processes, and microbiological processes, and found that they could all have ongoing possibilities.

Given appropriate environmental safeguards, EOR should become a major force in the production of energy for the United States over the next 20 years, and it seems reasonable to expect that much the same could apply to other parts of the world. However, it is important that safeguarding the environment should guide the DOE in terms of its incentive programmes for specific processes.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1980). First Joint SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, April 20–23, 1980, Proceedings. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Texas: 418 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barstow, W. F. (1976). Inert gas systems for secondary recovery. Pp. 18, illustr., in Joint Petroleum Mechanical Engineering and Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Association of Mechanical Engineers, 345 East 47th St, New York, NY 10017: preprint.Google Scholar
Campbell Company, D. A. (1980). UniCapital Corporation: Private Report. D. A. Campbell Company, Inc., 1150 Brooklawn Drive, Los Angeles, California 90024: 13 pp., (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax (1980). Price Waterhouse & Co., 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020: 38 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dempsey, John R. (1980). Kaneb Energy Report. Kaneb Services, The Kaneb Building, 5251 Westheimer, Houston, Texas 77056: 8 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Doesee U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Elias, R. Jr, Johnstone, J. R., Krause, J. D., Scanlan, J. C., Culligan, J. & Young, W. W. (1980). Steam generation with high TDF feedwater. Pp. 7584, illustr., in Anon. (1980). q.v.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. P. (1980). Compositional effects on displacement mechanisms of the micellar fluid injected in Sloss Field Test. Pp. 175–88, illustr., in Anon. (1980). q.v.Google Scholar
Hall, A. (1979). Where genetic engineering will change industry. Business Week, New York, NY: pp. 160–2, illustr.Google Scholar
Henry, R. L. & Metcalfe, R. S. (1980). Multiple phase generation during CO2 flooding. Pp. 716, illustr., in Anon. (1980) q.v.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. R. & Fox, R. L. (1980). Examination of techniques for thermally efficient delivery of steam to deep reservoirs. Pp. 8594, illustr., in Anon. (1980) q.v.Google Scholar
Kuuskraa, V. A. (1980). Major technology constraints in enhanced oil recovery. Pp. 2533, illustr., in Anon. (1980) q.v.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Michael (1980). The effects of environmental regulations on enhanced oil recovery. Pp. 15–8 in Proceedings Supplement, First Joint SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Texas: 71 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. M., Berg, R. L. [and associates] (1980). Alkaline injection for enhanced oil recovery—a status report. Pp. 407–18, illustr., in Anon. (1980) q.v.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. C. (1980). The salinity requirement diagram—a useful tool in chemical flooding research and development. Pp. 131–42, illustr., in Anon. (1980) q.v.Google Scholar
Nulty, P. (1979). We can wring more out of the oil patch. Fortune Magazine, pp. 5863.Google Scholar
Oil and Gas Journal (1980). EOR problems still plague producers. Oil and Gas Journal, Tulsa, Oklahoma: 04 28, pp. 81–4.Google Scholar
Pirals, M. (1978). Current appraisal of thermal recovery. Pp. 71–7 in Fifth Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Texas: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Pope, G. A. & Tasur, K. (1980). The effect of several polymers on the phase behavior of micellar fluids. Pp. 159–74, illustr., in Anon. (1980) q.v.Google Scholar
Revelle, R. R. & Shapero, D. C. (1978). Energy and Climate. Environmental Conservation, 5(2), pp. 8191, illustr.Google Scholar
Stalkup, F. I. (1978). Carbon dioxide miscible flooding: Past, present and outlook for the future. Pp. 3754, illustr., in SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Texas: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy (cited as DOE) (1979). Pp. 154, illustr., in Conference on Microbiological Processes Useful in Enhanced Oil Recovery, San Diego, California: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration (1979). Annual Report to Congress, Projections. Vol. 3. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC: 359 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (1978). Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential in the United States. Congress of the United States, Washington, DC: 238 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. L. & Yarborough, L. (1980). The effect of nitrogen on the phase behavior and physical properties of reservoir fluids. Pp. 4757, illustr., in Anon. (1980) q.v.Google Scholar