No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Optimal time for investment to regulate emissions of particulate matter in Indian thermal power plants
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2007
Abstract
This study aims to find the optimal switching point for the Indian coal-based power plants to switch to a cost-effective technology and reduce particulate emissions. Regulation in the form of an emission standard, an emissions tax, an ash tax, or a coal tax provides an incentive for the power plants to abate. We have taken a period of 40 years to show the pattern of abatement in a sample of 40 power plants. Linear programming using GAMS has been used for the analysis to determine when the plants will shift to cost-efficient technology. We have first done the analysis on a firm-to-firm basis and then we have aggregated to show the variability of our results.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
References
Bhattacharya, S. C. 1994, ‘Environment – thermal power generation nexus: the Indian Scenario’, Energy and Environment 5: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) 2000a, ‘Clean coal initiatives’, Parivesh, Ministry of Environment and Forests.Google Scholar
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) 2000b, ‘Air quality status and trends in India’, NAAQMS/14/1999–2000, Ministry of Environment and Forests.Google Scholar
Conrad, J. 1997, ‘Global warming: when to bite the bullet’, Land Economics 73: 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C., Withagen, C., and Toman, M. 2004, ‘Optimal investment in clean production capacity’, Environmental and Resource Economics 28: 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtala, A. and Laukkanen, M. 2004, ‘Optimal control of dynamic point and non-point pollution in a coastal ecosystem: agricultural abatement versus investment in wastewater treatment plants’, MTT Agrifood Research, Finland, Luutnantintie 13. http://151.36.224.12/ess04/contents/Laukkanen.pdfGoogle Scholar
Khanna, M., Isik, M., and Winter-Nelson, A. 2000, ‘Investment in site-specific crop management under uncertainty: implications for nitrogen pollution control and environmental policy’, Agricultural Economics 24: 9–21.Google Scholar
Khanna, M. and Zilberman, D. 1999a, ‘Barriers to energy-efficiency in electricity generation in India’, Energy Journal 20: 25–41.Google Scholar
Khanna, M. and Zilberman, D. 1999b, ‘Freer markets and the abatement of carbon emissions: the electricity-generating sector in India’, Resource and Energy Economics 21: 125–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, M. and Zilberman, D. 2001, ‘Adoption of energy efficient technologies and carbon abatement: the electricity generating sector in India’, Energy Economics 23: 637–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, L. and Sharma, C. 2001, ‘Anthropogenic emissions from energy activities in India: generation and source characterization’, ‘Emissions from Thermal Power Generation in India, Part I’, OSC, PCRM, Ohio, http://www.osc.edu/research/pcrm/emissions/India.pdfGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. S. and Vaughn, W. J. 2003, ‘The choice of pollution control policy instruments in developing countries: arguments, evidence and suggestions’, Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, pp. 331–370.Google Scholar
Smouse, S. M., Peters, W. C., Reed, R. W., and Krishnan, R. P. 1994, ‘Economic analysis of coal cleaning in India using state-of-the-art computer models’, Effects of Coal Quality on Power Plants, Proceedings 4th International Conference, pp. 6–33 to 6–61.Google Scholar
Stock, J. H. and Wise, D. A. 1990, ‘Pensions, the option value of work and retirement’, Econometrica 58: 1151–1180.Google Scholar
USAID 2001, ‘Reducing urban and industrial pollution in India’, CDIE, Impact Evaluation, PN- ACG-629, August: 1–16.Google Scholar