Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization

  • Eelke Michiel Heemskerk and Meindert Fennema

Abstract

Corporate elites have been all-male bastions until the twenty-first century. The recent inclusion of women in the corporate elite needs explanation because it is an abrupt change in recruitment practices. We consider female presence in corporate boards as a sign of the democratization of elite social networks. Building on a case study of the Netherlands that covers the last four decades, we show that the corporate elite has become more open to nonmembers of traditional elites. In the process, women have also entered the boardroom. Initially, these were predominantly female politicians, but more recently many large corporations have recruited foreign females. We argue that the incremental feminization of the corporate elite was in the beginning—that is in the 1970s—initiated by the state but was subsequently pushed forward by the internationalization of corporate governance. We have traced the professional background of all female board members of the largest firms in the Netherlands over the period 1969–2011. We show that the female board members do not form a homogeneous group. The first wave of female directors had a political background, the second wave had an academic background, whereas the third wave was recruited from within the corporations. In this third wave, foreign female directors became predominant. Elites open up their ranks and privileged positions to women, but they do so reluctantly and under outside pressure.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All

Books

Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat (Marquis de). La Politique De Condorcet. Paris: Payot & Rivages, 1996.
De Gouges, Olympe. “Declaration of the Rights of Woman and Citizen. http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/293/, 1791.
Domhoff, G. William. The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats. A Study in Ruling-class Cohesiveness. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
Domhoff, G. William. The Higher Circles. The Governing class in America. New York: Random House, 1970.
Fennema, MeindertHeemskerk, Eelke M. Nieuwe Netwerken: De Ondergang Van De NV Nederland. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Bert Bakker, 2008.
Heemskerk, Eelke M.Decline of the Corporate Community. Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.
Helmers, H. M.Mokken, Robert J.Plijter, R. C.Stokman, Frans N.. Graven Naar Macht. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Van Gennep, 1975.
Janis, Irving. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1982.
Pitkin, Hannah F.The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967.
Podolny, J. M.Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Richardson, I. N.Kakabadse, A.Kakabadse, N.. Bilderberg People: Elite Power and Consensus in World Affairs. London and New York: Oxon: Routledge, 2011.
Scott, John. Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Stokman, Frans N.Ziegler, RolfScott, John. Networks of Corporate Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1985.
Adams, R. B.Ferreira, D. “Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics 94, no. 2 (2009): 291309.
Burt, Ronald S. “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.” American Journal of Sociology 110, no. 2 (2004): 349–99.
Campbell, K.Minguez-Vera, A. “Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance.” Journal of Business Ethics 83, no. 3 (2008): 435–51.
Carroll, William K.Fennema, Meindert. “Is There a Transnational Business Community?” International Sociology 17, no. 3 (2002): 393419.
Carter, D. A.D’Souza, F.Simkins, B. J.Simpson, W. G.. “The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 18, no. 5 (2010): 396414.
Centola, DamonMacy, Michael W. “Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 113, no. 3 (2007): 702–34.
Croson, R.Buchan, N. “Gender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence from Trust Games.” The American Economic Review 89, no. 2 (1999): 386–91.
Dalton, D. R.Daily, Catherine M.Ellstrand, Alan E.Johnson, Jonathan L.. “Meta-analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 19, no. 3 (1998): 269–90.
Del Giudice, M.Booth, T.Irwing, P.. “The Distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring Global Sex Differences in Personality.” PloS One 7, no. 1 (2012): e29265.
Erhardt, N. L.Werbel, J. D.Shrader, C. B.. “Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 11, no. 2 (2003): 102–11.
Erkut, S.Kramer, V. W.Konrad, A. M.. “Critical Mass: Does the Number of Women on a Corporate Board Make a Difference?” In Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Research and Practice, edited by Vinnicombe, SusanSingh, ValBurke, Ronald J.Bilimoria, DianaHuse, Morten, 222230. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008.
Fairfax, L. M. “Clogs in the Pipeline: The Mixed Data on Women Directors and Continued Barriers to their Advancement.” Maryland Law Review 65 (2006): 579.
Fairfax, Lisa. “Board Diversity Revisited: New Rationale, Same Old Story?” North Carolina Law Review 89 (2011): 854.
Fennema, MeindertSchijf, Huibert. “Elites in Nederland.” In Nederlandse Elites in De Twintigste Eeuw: Continuiteit en Verandering, edited by Fennema, MeindertSchijf, Huibert, 714. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, 2004.
Fleron, Frederic J. Jr.“Cooptation as a Mechanism of Adaption to Change: The Soviet Political Leadership System.” Polity 2, no. 2 (Winter 1969): 176201.
Forbes, D. P.Milliken, F. J. “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups.” Academy of Management Review 24, no. 3 (1999): 489505.
Granovetter, Mark S. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (1973): 136080.
Greve, H. R.Mitsuhashi, H. “Power and Glory: Concentrated Power in Top Management Teams.” Organization Studies 28, no. 8 (2007): 1197221.
Haasnoot, Shirley. “Ondernemer Paul Fentener Van Vlissingen: ‘Ik moest iets studeren waarmee ik altijd mijn boterham kon verdienen’.” Historisch Nieuwsblad 11, no. 5 (2002): 49.
Heemskerk, Eelke M. “De Internationalisering van de Nederlandse Financieel Economische Bestuurselite.” In Nederlandse Elites in De Twintigste Eeuw, edited by Fennema, Meindert, 3956. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, 2004.
Heemskerk, Eelke M.Fennema, Meindert. “Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite.” International Sociology 24, no. 6 (2009): 807–32.
Heemskerk, Eelke M.Mokken, Robert J.Fennema, Meindert. “The Fading of the State: Corporate-Government Networks in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53, no. 4 (2012): 253–74.
Heminway, J. M. “Sex, Trust, and Corporate Boards.” Bepress Legal Series (2006). Working Paper 1527, August 2002.
Jianakoplos, Nancy AmmonBernasek, Alexandra. “Are Women More Risk Averse?” Economic Enquiry 36, no. 4 (October 1998): 620–30.
Kramer, V. W.Konrad, A. M.Erkut, S.Hooper, M. J..“Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More Women Enhance Governance.” Directors Monthly 31, no. 2 (02 2007): 1922.
Langevoort, D. C. “Puzzles about Corporate Boards and Board Diversity.” North Carolina Law Review 89 (2011): 8411055.
Lückerath-Rovers, M. “Women on Boards and Firm Performance.” Journal of Management and Governance 17, no. 2 (May 2013): 491509.
McPherson, MillerSmith-Lovin, LynnCook, James M.. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27 (2001): 415–44.
Miller, T.del Carmen Triana, M. “Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity–firm Performance Relationship.” Journal of Management Studies 46, no. 5 (2009): 755–86.
Pettigrew, Andrew M. “On Studying Managerial Elites.” Strategic Management Journal 13 (Winter 1992): 163–82.
Schmidt, S. L.Brauer, M. “Strategic Governance: How to Assess Board Effectiveness in Guiding Strategy Execution.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 14, no. 1 (2006): 1322.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. “Democracy in America.” In Great Books of the Western World, edited by Adler, Mortimer J., vol. 44. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica (1840), 1990.
Van Veen, KeesMarsman, Ilse. “How International Are Executive Boards of European MNCs? Nationality Diversity in 15 European Countries.” European Management Journal 26, no. 3 (2008): 188–98.
Visser, J. “The First Part-Time Economy in the World: A Model to be Followed?” Journal of European Social Policy 12, no. 1 (2002): 2342.
Washington, M.Zajac, Edward J. “Status Evolution and Competition: Theory and Evidence.” The Academy of Management Journal 48, no. 2 (2005): 282–96.
Westphal, James D.Khanna, Poonam. “Keeping Directors in Line: Social Distancing as a Control Mechanism in the Corporate Elite.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2003): 361–98.
Wilkins, David B. “From ‘Separate Is Inherently Unequal’ to ‘Diversity is Good for Business’: The Rise of Market-Based Diversity Arguments and the Fate of the Black Corporate Bar.” Harvard Law Review 117, no. 5 (March 2004): 1548615.
Mees, HeleenKroes, Neelie. “Meer Vrouwen Aan De Top - Desnoods Verplicht.” NRC Handelsblad, October 17, 2006.
Pfister, ReneSchult, Christoph. “Gender Quota Debate: We Have to Rethink Our Entire Social Model.” Spiegel Online, March 27, 2012.
Rhode, D.Packel, A. “Diversity on Corporate Boards: How Much Difference Does Difference Make?” Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 89 (2010).
Alliance for Board Diversity. “Women and Minorities on Fortune 100 Boards.” http://theabd.org/Women%20and%20Minorities%20on%20F100%20Boards_2008.pdf, 2008.
Catalyst. Women on Board: Quick Takes. New York: Catalyst, 2012.
PortegijsW., B. W., B.Hermans, en V. Lalta.Emancipatiemonitor 2006. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2007.
Merens, Ansvan den Brakel, MarionHartgers, MarijkeHermans, B.. Emancipatiemonitor 2010. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau and Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2011.
Merens, AnsHartgers, Marijkevan den Brakel, Marion. Emancipatiemonitor 2012. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau and Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2013.
Barnes, Roy C. “The Organizational Mosaic of U.S. Corporate Directors.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Network for Social Network Analysis, Corfu Island, Greece, May 4, 2007.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization

  • Eelke Michiel Heemskerk and Meindert Fennema

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.