Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T16:33:29.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical Introduction to the Special Issue on the Embedded Enterprise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Kathryn Ibata-Arens ,
Julian Dierkes  and
Dirk Zorn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Guest Editors' Introduction
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2006. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Amsden, Alice H. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Bergère, Marie-Claire. The Golden Age of the Chinese Bourgeoisie, 1911–1937. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Mass., 1992.Google Scholar
Cochran, Sherman. Big Business in China: Sino-Foreign Rivalry in the Cigarette Industry, 1890–1930. Cambridge, Mass., 1980.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge, U.K., 1994.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald Philip. Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy, 1970–80. Stanford, Calif., 1986.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald Philip. Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism, Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford, U.K., 2000.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, N.J., 1995.Google Scholar
Fields, Karl J. Enterprise and the State in Korea and Taiwan. Ithaca, N.Y., 1995.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass., 2005.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, U.K., 2001.Google Scholar
Herrigel, Gary. Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power. Cambridge, U.K., 1996.Google Scholar
Ibata-Arens, Kathryn. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Japan: Politics, Organizations, and High Technology Firms. Cambridge, U.K., 2005.Google Scholar
Imai, Kenichi. Benchaazu Infura [The Infrastructure of Venture Companies]. Tokyo, 1998.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan, Karen S. Cook, and Ronald S. Burt, eds. Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Lipartito, Kenneth, and David B. Sicilia, eds. Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture. New York, 2004.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London, 1922.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J., and Charles F. Sabel. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston, 1944.Google Scholar
Saxenian, AnnaLee. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass., 1994.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 4th ed. London, 1954.Google Scholar
Scott, James. The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven, Conn., 1976.Google Scholar
Stopford, John M., and Susan Strange. Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge, U.K., 1991.Google Scholar
Yamamura, Kozo, and Wolfgang Streeck. The End of Diversity? Prospects for German and Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca, N.Y., 2003.Google Scholar
Zukin, Sharon, and Paul DiMaggio, eds. Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. New York, 1990.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Baker, Peter. “Spatial Outcomes of Capital Restructuring: ‘New Industrial Spaces’ as a Symptom of Crisis, Not Solution.” Review of Political Economy 8, no. 3 (1996): 263–78.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. “Employers, Public Policy, and the Politics of Decentralized Cooperation in Germany and France.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, ed. Peter A. Hall and David Soskice. Oxford, U.K., 2001, pp. 275–306.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (April 1983): 147–60.Google Scholar
George, Alexander, and Timothy McKeown. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making.” In Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, ed. Robert Coulam and Richard Smith. London, 1985, pp. 21–58.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (Nov. 1985): 481–510.Google Scholar
Herrigel, Gary, and Charles Sabel. “Craft Production in Crisis.” In The German Skills Machine: Sustaining Comparative Advantage in a Global Economy, ed. Pepper D. Culpepper and David Finegold. New York, 1999, pp. 77–114.Google Scholar
Ibata-Arens, Kathryn. “The Comparative Political Economy of Innovation.” Review of International Political Economy 10, no. 1 (2003): 147–65.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi, Daniel M. G. Raff, and Peter Temin. “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History.” American Historical Review 108 (April 2003): 404–33.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. “The Economy as an Instituted Process.” In Trade and Markets in the Early Empires, ed. Karl Polanyi, Conrad Arensberg, and Harry W. Pearson. Glencoe, Ill., 1957, pp. 243–70.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Ikuo Kume. “The Rise of Nonliberal Training Regimes: Germany and Japan Compared.” In Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison, ed. Wolfgang Streeck and Kozo Yamamura. Ithaca, N.Y., 2001, pp. 200–227.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present 50 (Feb. 1971): 76–136.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Pamela, and Lynne Zucker. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (March 1983): 22–39.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (March 1997): 35–67.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61 (Aug. 1996): 674–98.Google Scholar
Zorn, Dirk. “Here a Chief, There a Chief: The Rise of the CFO in the American Firm.” American Sociological Review 69, no. 3 (2004): 345–64.Google Scholar