Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T12:28:37.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jan Stievermann, Philip Goff, and Detlef Junker, eds. Religion and the Marketplace in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. xii + 295 pp. ISBN 9780199361793, $99.00 (cloth); 9780199361809, $35.00 (paper).

Review products

Jan Stievermann, Philip Goff, and Detlef Junker, eds. Religion and the Marketplace in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. xii + 295 pp. ISBN 9780199361793, $99.00 (cloth); 9780199361809, $35.00 (paper).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

Timothy Gloege*
Affiliation:
E-mail: gloege@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2016. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. 

Since the 1990s, a steady stream of academic work has examined the complex interplay between “religion” and “the market.” Conventional wisdom once considered capitalism the harbinger of secular society, thus these studies presumed religion’s decline or noted its paradoxical persistence. However, scholars have since abandoned this conventional wisdom, swayed by mounting evidence of longstanding connections between religion and capitalism that have become only more pronounced in the present. This turn produced innovative studies that systematically and substantively engaged the historiographies of both business and religion. The resulting work created something indispensable for both fields, but it developed without an organizing framework. If religion is not competing with the market in a zero-sum game, how should this relationship be characterized?

Religion and the Marketplace in the United States, a collection of twelve essays by both new and established scholars of religion, is a helpful contribution to this discussion. Its five sections smartly lay out the state of the field, suggest productive avenues for future research, and offer new ways to connect religion and the marketplace.

A general introduction provides a helpful overview of the field. Most historical work is rooted in material culture studies, which can be grouped into two lines of inquiry. One line focuses on the “literal, concrete intersections” (5) between religion and business and takes as its subjects either religious businesses (religious publishers, for example) or business-like religious institutions. The other approach examines the interplay between economic ideas and religious beliefs. These “concrete” and “ideological” approaches may seem incommensurate, but the volume demonstrates otherwise.

The collection also targets two longstanding metanarratives for demolition. The “single-explanation” (9) metanarrative, rooted in Karl Marx and Max Weber, presumes that economic and religious spheres can be easily separated and that one explains the other. The “religious marketplace” metanarrative, rooted in rational choice theory, uses the metaphor to explain the unusual religiosity of the United States among industrialized countries. E. Brooks Holifield directly tackles this second metanarrative in the volume’s first section. A freedom to choose religious affiliation may have contributed something to the nation’s religious vitality, he argues, but a full explanation must account for multiple causes and historical contingency.

Part Two uses a single religious group, evangelicals, to model how “ideological” and “concrete” approaches can work together. Mark Valeri uses merchant participants in the eighteenth-century “Great Awakening” to reveal significant ideological contributions evangelicals made to modern capitalism, contributions that Weber missed. Grant Wacker, in contrast, focuses on the ways that Billy Graham borrowed concrete business practices. Hilde Løvdal Stephens then returns to ideas, showing that modern evangelicals’ unabashed lionization of free market ideology does not automatically translate into a laissez-faire morality.

Part Three is organized around a single business sector, publishing, and includes some of the strongest essays in the collection. Daniel Silliman’s economic history of the bestselling apocalyptic book series Left Behind challenges the widespread practice of divining an era’s cultural zeitgeist from bestsellers. Matthew Hedstrom illuminates how genre-makers at Harper Publishers (later HarperSanFrancisco) were inspired by the ideas of William James to reimagine the category “religion” as a “universal quest” (128). Combined, these essays show the intricate connections between ideas and structures. This section also includes an essay by Günter Leypoldt that explores Toni Morrison’s encounter with Oprah Winfrey. In it, the “capital” is cultural and the “sacred” is a metaphorical reference to the opinions of literary critics.

Leypoldt’s essay would have fit better in Part Four, which shifts from history to critical theory, and with it to the metaphorical treatment of “religion as the marketplace” (22). Katia Rakow provides an illuminating explanation of how the branding practices of megachurch minister Joel Osteen create subjects defined primarily by their individual choices. In addition, Sarah Pike offers a religious analysis of Coachella, Burning Man, and other festivals; and Anthony Santoro argues that sports stadiums have a religious core. These essays will be a welcome addition for those interested in debates about the nature of religion and the ways that market metaphors can contribute to those discussions. However, casual readers and business historians may get lost in their many theoretical referents.

The concluding essay by Kathryn Lofton, “Considering the Neoliberal in American Religion” (269), offers a compelling roadmap for future research. It stands as one of the clearest, and thus most helpful, analyses of the present neoliberal moment and its relationship to all manner of “religion.” The “central insight” of the volume, she notes, is that “religious life and economic life are inextricable in the United States, with one producing the other in a recursive round” (270). This is a striking reversal of the old conventional wisdom. What remains, then, is to explain the “stunning consistency” of economic and religious ideology. By this, Lofton does not suggest that scholars of religion slip into a tacit “acceptance of the logic and valuations of markets” (285); rather, it is a call to historicize the present moment and think about what is obscured by present categories.

Some might complain, with cause, that the volume would more accurately be titled “Protestant Religion and the Marketplace” (or even White Protestant, excepting the regular appearance of Oprah Winfrey and the cameo by Toni Morrison). Fortunately, the insights it offers will be applicable to a wide array of religious subjects. As such, it is an important addition to the study of religion and markets.