Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T15:58:03.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Joan C. Beal, Carmela Nocera & Massimo Sturiale (eds.). Perspectives on prescriptivism (Linguistic Insights 73). Bern: Peter Lang, 2008. Pp. 269 + 9 tables and graphs. ISBN 978-3-03911-632-4.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Maria E. Rodriguez-Gil*
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Humanidades, Perez del Toro 1, 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spainerodriguez@las-palmas.uned.es

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cajka, Karen. 2003. The forgotten women grammarians of eighteenth-century England. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. (ed.). 2006. New approaches to the study of later modern English, special issue of Historiographia Linguistica 33(1/2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, Carol. 2000. ‘Easy women’: Defining and confining the ‘feminine’ style in eighteenth-century print culture. Language Science 22, 315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Gil, María E. 2008. Ann Fisher's A New Grammar, or was it Daniel Fisher's work? In Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 149–76. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2000. Female grammarians of the eighteenth century. HSL/SHL 1, www.let.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/femgram.htm (2 January 2009)Google Scholar