Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T00:18:54.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I. M. Schlesinger, Cognitive space and linguistic case. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Pp. xiv + 239. £35, US$54.95, ISBN 0 521 43436 X.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2008

John M. Anderson
John M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of English LanguageUniversity of EdinburghDavid Hume TowerGeorge SquareEdinburgh EH8 9JXELAJMAS@srv0.arts.ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , November 1997 , pp. 369 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. M. (1977). On case grammar: prolegomena to a theory of grammatical relations. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1994). Case grammar. In Asher, R. E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. 453–64.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1988). Objects (direct and not-so-direct) in English and elsewhere. In Duncan-Rose, C. & Vennemann, T. (eds.), On language: Rhetorica Phonologica Syntactica. A festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his friends and colleagues. London & New York: Routledge. 287–314.Google Scholar
Cook, W. A. (1989). Case grammar theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1–88.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1935). La catégorie des cas, I. Acta Jutlandica 7: i–xii, 1–184.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1980). Affixation and the unaccusative hypothesis. Chicago Linguistic Society 16: 134–46.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45: 233–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, F. (ed.) (1984). Objects: towards a theory of grammatical relations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Somers, H. L. (1987). Valency and case in computational linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar