Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T18:13:37.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Peter Collins, Modals and quasi-modals in English (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 67). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2009. Pp. viii + 193.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Raphael Salkie*
Affiliation:
University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 0JY, UKR.M.Salkie@brighton.ac.uk

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 2010. Future time reference expressed by be to in Present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 14 (2), 271–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse & Verhulst, An. 2008. Source of modality: a reassessment. English Language and Linguistics 12 (1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffreyet al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mindt, Dieter. An empirical of the English verb: Modal verbs. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 383400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1990. Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1505–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar