Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T20:16:19.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reasons for reconsidering quantitative research based on the use of Likert scale and other social science data sets - J. Michell. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Price: $99.00 (hardback)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Peter Grimbeek
Peter Grimbeek*
Affiliation:
Grifith University
*
Faculty of Education, Griffith University, Nathan Queensland 4111, Phone: (07) 3875 5629, E-mail: p.grimbeek@mailbox.gu.edu.au

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , November 1999 , pp. 89 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1999

References

Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). USA: Wadsworth. Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 667–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). USA: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar