Skip to main content Accessibility help

Questioning New Directions in Understanding Student Motivation: An Investigation Into the Domain Specificity of Motivational Goals

  • Natasha R. Magson (a1), Gawaian H. Bodkin-Andrews (a1), Rhonda G. Craven (a1), Genevieve F. Nelson (a1) and Alexander Seeshing Yeung (a1)...


Most past models of student motivation have assumed that student motivation generalises across various achievement situations and curriculum domains; however, research has not fully explored the extent to which motivation may be domain-specific (Green, Martin, & Marsh, 2007; Martin, 2008). The purpose of the present investigation was to explore this issue by comparing and contrasting generalised models of motivation with domain-specific models and how they relate to achievement outcomes in mathematics and English. Secondary students (N = 476) completed both the domain-general (ISM, McInerney, 2003) and the researcher-derived domain-specific motivational measure (DSSM) followed by a standardised achievement test (WRAT-3, Wilkinson, 1993). Overall, the study resulted in mixed findings. There was some indication that there was enough independent variance between the domain-specific goal types to suggest they were tapping distinct constructs as found in previous research (Green et al., 2007). However, the small and often inconsistent correlations with achievement outcomes brings into question the usefulness for educators and the research practicality of pursuing such a division.


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Natasha Magson, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, South Penrith DC, 1797, Australia. Email:


Hide All
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 260267.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). National assessment program: Literacy and numeracy. Retrieved June 14, 2012, from
Barker, K.L., Dowson, M., & McInerney, D.M. (2006, July). Unifying the literature on students' academic motivation: A multidimensional and hierarchical representation of students' goals and academic self-concept. Paper presented at the The Fourth International Biennial SELF Research Conference, Michigan University, Ann Arbor, MI.
Barker, K.L., McInerney, D.M., & Dowson, M. (2002). Performance approach, performance avoidance and depth of information processing: A fresh look at relations between students' academic motivation and cognition. Educational Psychology, 22 (5), 571589.
Bodkin-Andrews, G., O'Rourke, V., & Craven, R.G. (2010). The utility of general self-esteem and domain-specific self-concepts: Their influence on Indigenous and non-Indigenous students' educational outcomes. Australian Journal of Education, 54 (3), 277306.
Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bong, M. (1996). Problems in academic motivation research and advantages and disadvantages of their solutions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 149165.
Bong, M. (2001). Between-and-within domain relations of Academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task-value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 2334.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K.A. & Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B.N. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Byrne, B.M., & Gavin, D.A.W. (1996). The Shavelson Model revisited: Testing for the structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 (2), 215228.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227268.
DeVellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications.
Dowson, M., & McInerney, D.M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals?: Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28 (1), 91113.
Dowson, M., McInerney, D.M., & Nelson, G.F. (2006). An investigation of the effects of school context and sex differences on students' motivational goals. Educational Psychology, 26 (6), 781811.
Duda, J.L. (2001). Achievement goal research in sport: Pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstandings. In Roberts, G.C. (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise, (pp.129182.
Duda, J.L., & Nicholls, J.G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290299.
Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256273.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (4), 541553.
Green, J., Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17 (3), 269279.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Pintrich, P.R., Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638645.
Hills, A. (2011). Foolproof guide to statistics using IBM and SPSS (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Pearson Education Australia.
Hoyle, R.H., & Panter, A.T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 158176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 7699). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 155.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M.J. (2002). Should childhood be a journey or a race? A response to Harackiewicz et al. (2002). Journal of Educational psychology, 94, 646648.
Linnenbrink, E.A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197213.
McInerney, D.M. (2003). Motivational goals, self-concept, and a self — What predicts academic achievement? Similarities and differences between Aboriginal and Anglo Australians in high school settings. In Marsh, H.W., Craven, R.G., & McInerney, D.M. (Eds.), International advances in SELF research: New frontiers for SELF research (pp. 31346). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
McInerney, D.M., & Ali, J. (2006). Multidimensional and hierarchical assessment of school motivation: Cross-cultural validation. Educational Psychology, 26, 717734.
McInerney, D.M., Hinkley, J., Dowson, M., & Van Etten, S. (1998). Aboriginal, Anglo, and immigrant Australian students' motivational beliefs about personal academic success: Are there cultural differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (4), 621629.
McInerney, D.M., Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (2003). Toward a hierarchical goal theory model of school motivation. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 335357.
McInerney, D.M., Roche, L.A., McInerney, V., & Marsh, H.W. (1997). Cultural perspectives on school motivation: The relevance and application of goal theory. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (1), 207236.
McWilliams, M.A., Nier, J.A., & Singer, J.A. (2013). The implicit self and the specificity-matching principle: Implicit self-concept predicts domain-specific outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 54 (4), 474478. doi:
Maehr, M.L. (1984). Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In Ames, R. & Ames, C. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Student motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 115144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Marsh, H.W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23 (1), 129149.
Maehr, M., & McInerney, D.M. (2004). Motivation as personal investment. In McInerney, D.M. & Etten, S. Van (Eds.), Sociocultural influences on motivation and learning, Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 6190). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & Hau, K.-T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical processes. In Marcoulides, G.A. & Schumaker, R.E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marsh, H.W., Byrne, B.M., & Yeung, S.Y. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34 (3), 155167.
Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R.G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective. Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1 (2), 133163.
Marsh, H.W., Craven, R.G., Hinkley, J.W., & Debus, R.L. (2003). Evaluation of the Big-Two-Factor Theory of academic motivation orientations: An evaluation of jingle-jangle fallacies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38 (2), 189224.
Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K.T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalisabilty of the Internal/External frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (1), 5667.
Marsh, H.W., Roche, L.A., Pajares, F., & Miller, D. (1997). Item-specific efficacy judgments in mathematical problem solving: The downside of standing too close to trees in a forest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 363377.
Martin, A.J. (2008). How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive–methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33 (4), 785813. doi:
Meece, J.L., Anderman, E.M., & Anderman, L.H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487503.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 7786.
Murphy, P.K., & Alexander, P.A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 353.
Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Koller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12 (4), 323345.
Nelson, G.F. (2004). Similarities and differences in motivation and processes of learning between Papua New Guinea and Australian school students. Unpublished thesis, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Nelson, G.F. (2007). The socio-economic and psychological determinants of student academic outcomes in Papua New Guinea. Unpublished thesis, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Papoulis, A. (1990). Probability and statistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pintrich, P.R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and, research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92104.
Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407441.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (2), 438456.
Urdan, T.C. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions (Vol. 10). Greenwich CT: JAI Press Inc.
Urdan, T.C., & Maehr, M.L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65 (3), 213243.
Valle, A., Cabanach, R.G., Núnez, J.C., González-Pienda, J., Rodriguez, S., & Pineiro, I. (2003). Cognitive motivational and volitional dimensions of learning: An empirical test of a hypothetical model. Research in Higher Education, 44, 557580.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92 (4), 548573.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32, 5968.
Wilkinson, G. (1993). WRAT-3: Wide Range Achievement Test administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
Wolters, C.A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236250.


Questioning New Directions in Understanding Student Motivation: An Investigation Into the Domain Specificity of Motivational Goals

  • Natasha R. Magson (a1), Gawaian H. Bodkin-Andrews (a1), Rhonda G. Craven (a1), Genevieve F. Nelson (a1) and Alexander Seeshing Yeung (a1)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed