Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T23:51:09.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Juvenile offending: An overview in support of assessing risk factors, needs, and strengths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Anthony P. Thompson
Anthony P. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University
*
Charles Sturt University, WAGGA WAGGA NSW 2650, Phone: 61 2 6933 2775, Fax: 61 2 6933 2792, E-mail: athompson@csu.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This article provides information about some of the key concepts and principles that define society’s approach to juvenile offenders. These are explicated as models of juvenile justice. The causes of juvenile offending are also elaborated through considering various theories of juvenile delinquency. Next, the prevalence of juvenile crime is addressed followed by an overview of preventative and responsive interventions to reduce juvenile offending. The article makes the case for a systematic approach to assessing risk factors, needs, and strengths. This approach fits well with major threads in the juvenile justice arena. It is also necessary in order to make sound and useful decisions about young offenders.

Keywords

InterventionsJuvenile OffendersJustice ModelLegislationWelfare Model
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , 2001 , pp. 39 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 319–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alder, C. (1997). Theories of female delinquency. In Borowski, A. & O’Connor, I. (Eds.), Juvenile crime, justice, & corrections (pp. 43–59). Melbourne: Longman.Google Scholar
Alder, C., & Wundersitz, J. (1994). Family conferencing and juvenile justice: The way forward or misplaced optimism. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Andrews, D.A. (1982). The level of supervision inventory. The first follow-up. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.Google Scholar
Andrews, D.A. (1991). Recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: Using risk assessments to reduce recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research, 1(2), 11–17.Google Scholar
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.Google Scholar
Andrews, D.A. & Bonta, J. (1995). Level of service inventory-Revised. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J., & Hoge, R.D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, J.J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beirne, R. (1988). Heredity versus environment. A reconsideration of Charles Goring’s the English convict (1913). The British Journal of Criminology, 28, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessant, J., & Hill, R. (1997). Youth, crime, & the media. Media representation of and reaction to young people in relation to law and order. Hobart, Tasmania: National Clearinghouse for Youth Studies.Google Scholar
Borduin, C.M., Mann, B.J., Cone, L.T., Henggeler, S.W., Fucci, B.R., Blaske, D. M., et al. (1995). Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 569–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borum, R. (1996). Improving clinical practice of violent risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training. American Psychologist, 51, 945–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J., & Mugford, S. (1994). Conditions of successful reintegration ceremonies. British Journal of Criminology, 34, 139–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research Perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckner, J.C., & Cain, A. C. (1998). Prevention science research with children, adolescents, and families: Introduction. American Journal of Orthospychiatry, 68, 508–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catalano, R.R., Arthur, M.W., Hawkins, J.D., Berglund, L., & Olson, J.J. (1998). Comprehensive community- and school-based interventions to prevent antisocial behavior. In Loeber, R.L. & Farrington, D.P. (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 248–283). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chan, J.B.L. (1997). Understanding juvenile crime: A review of traditional and contemporary theories. In Borowski, A. & O’Connor, I. (Eds.), Juvenile crime, justice, & corrections (pp. 25–42). Melbourne: Longman.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F.A. (2002). A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 6–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrado, R.R. (1992a). Introduction. In Corrado, R.R., Bala, N., Linden, R., & Le Blanc, M. (Eds.), Juvenile justice in Canada: A theoretical and analytical assessment (pp. 1–20). Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Corrado, R.R. (1992b). A comparative examination of the modified justice model in the United Kingdom and the United States. In Corrado, R.R., Bala, N., Linden, R., & Le Blanc, M. (Eds.), Juvenile justice in Canada: A theoretical and analytical assessment (pp. 75–136). Toronto: ButterworthsGoogle Scholar
Coventry, G., & Polk, K. (1985). Theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency. In Borowski, A. & Murray, J.M. (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency in Australia (pp. 43–53). North Ryde, NSW: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C., & White, R. (1995). Juvenile justice: An Australian perspective. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Department of Human Services (2000). Improving the lives of young Victorians in our community. A summary report. Melbourne: State of Victoria.Google Scholar
Dishion, T.J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durlak, J.A. (1998). Common risk and protective factors in successful prevention programs. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 512–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, T.W., & Farmer, E.M.Z. (2001). Developmental science, systems of care, and prevention of emotional and behavioral problems in youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 7, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grizenko, N., & Pawliuk, N. (1994). Risk and protective factors for disruptive behavior disorders in children. American Journal of Orthospychiatry, 64, 534–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1987). Revivication of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. (1996). Delinquency and crime: Current theories. Melbourne:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henggeler, S.W., & Melton, G.B., & Smith, L.A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 60, 953–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henggeler, S.W., Schoenwald, S.K., Borduin, C.M., Rowland, M.D., & Cunningham, P.B. (1998). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hirschi, T. (1972). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hoge, R.D. (2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 380–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoge, R.D., & Andrews, D.A. (1995). Australian adaptation of the youth level of service/case management inventory. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (1996). Assessing the youthful offender: Issues and techniques. NewYork: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoge, R.D., & Andrews, D.A. (1999). The youth level of service/case management inventory (YLS/CMI). Intake manual and item scoring key (revised). Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
Hudson, J., Morris, A., Maxwell, G., & Galaway, B. (1996). Family group conferences: Perspectives on policy & practice. Annandale, NSW: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Kleinmuntz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 296–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawlink, NSW. (2000). A review of the law on the age of criminal responsibility of children. Retrieved 20 September, 2000, from http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/clrdl.nsf/pages/clrd_childGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M.W., & Derzon, J.H. (1989). Predictors of violent and serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In Loeber, R.L. & Farrington, D.P. (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In Loeber, R.L. & Farrington, D.P. (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313–345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lochman, J.E., & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1995). Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markiewicz, A., Lagay, B., Murray, H., & Campbell, L. (1997a). Juvenile justice group conferencing in Victoria: An evaluation of a pilot program. Melbourne: School of Social Work, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, A., Lagay, B., Murray, H., & Campbell, L. (1997b). Juvenile justice group conferencing in Victoria: An evaluation of a pilot program. Phase two. Melbourne: School of Social Work, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (1996). Research on family group conferences with young offenders in New Zealand. In Hudson, J., Morris, A., Maxwell, G., & Galaway, B. (Eds.), Family group conferences: Perspectives on policy and practice (pp. 88–110). Annandale, NSW: Federation Press.Google Scholar
McLaren, K. L. (2000). Tough is not enough-Getting smart about youth crime. A review of research on what works to reduce offending by young people. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
New South Wales. (1987). Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act. Australasian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 29 November, 2001, from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cpal987261/Google Scholar
New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (1998). Juveniles in crime-Part 1 : Participation rates and risk factors. Sydney: Attorney General’s Department.Google Scholar
O’Connor, I. (1997). Models of juvenile justice. In Borowski, A. & O’Connor, I. (Eds.), Juvenile crime, justice, & corrections (pp. 229–253). Melbourne:Longman.Google Scholar
Papalia, D.E., Camp, C. J., & Feldman, R.D. (1996). Adult development and aging. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Patterson, G.R., DeBaryshe, B.D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspectice on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putniņš, A.L. (1999). Secure care psychosocial screening: Manual for SECAPS V.4. Adelaide: Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
Queensland. (1992). Juvenile Justice Act. Australasian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved on 29 November, 2000, from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/jjal992191/s4.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M., Giller, H., & Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial behaviour by young people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shamsie, J., Nicholl, S., & Madsen, K.C. (1999). Antisocial and violent youth. Research from over 600 experts in easy to read format. Toronto, Ontario:Lugus and Institute for the Study of Antisocial Behaviour in Youth.Google Scholar
Simourd, L., & Andrews, D.A. (1994). Correlates of delinquency: A look at gender differences. Forum on Corrections Research, 6(1), 26–31.Google Scholar
South Australia. (1993). Young Offenders Act. Australian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved on 29 November, 2000, from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_act/yoal993181/s3.htmlGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A.P., & Putnins, A. L. (2002). Risk assessment inventories for juvenile offenders in Australia. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Tolan, P.H., Guerra, N.G., & Kendall, P.C. (1995a). Introduction to special section: Prediction and prevention of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 515–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolan, P.H., Guerra, N.G., & Kendall, P.C. (1995b). A developmental-ecological perspective on antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: Toward a unified risk and intervention framework. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, R.E., Pagani-Kurtz, L., Masse, L.C., Vitaro, F., & Pihl, R.O. (1995). A bimodal preventive intervention for disruptive kindergarten boys: Its impact through mid-adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 560–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umbreit, M. (1994). Victim meets offender: The impact of restorative justice and mediation. New York: Willow Tree Press.Google Scholar
Van Krieken, R. (1991). Children and the state: Social control and the formation of Australian child welfare. Sydney: Allen & Un win.Google Scholar
Wasserman, G.A., & Miller, L.S. (1998). The prevention of serious and violent juvenile offending. In Loeber, R. L. & Farrington, D.P. (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 197–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Webster, C.D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20 scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Werner, E.E. (1989). High-risk children in young adulthood: A longitudinal study from birth to 32 years. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Western Australia. (1994). Young Offenders Act. Australasian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 29 November, 2000, from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/wa/consol_act/yoal994181/s7.htmlGoogle Scholar
Williams, P.G., Holmbeck, G.N., Greenley, R.N. (2002). Adolescent health psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 828–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R.L. (1997). Understanding children from adversity: Welfare options. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales: Keon Publications.Google Scholar
Wrightsman, L.S., Nietzel, M.T., & Fortune, W.H. (1998). Psychology & the legal system (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Wundersitz, J. (1996). The South Australian juvenile justice system: A review of its operation. Adelaide, South Australia: Office of Crime Statistics, Attorney General’s Department.Google Scholar