Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T06:49:46.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Support to Mitigate the Impact of Suicide for Disaster Aid Workers of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2023

Naru Fukuchi*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Miyagi, Japan Miyagi Disaster Mental Health Care Center, Miyagi, Japan
Jun Shigemura
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Mejiro University, Saitama, Japan
Akiko Obara
Affiliation:
Miyagi Mental Health and Welfare Center, Miyagi, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Naru Fukuchi; Email: narufukunarufuku@gmail.com.

Abstract

Suicide substantially impacts disaster-affected communities due to pre-existing psychosocial effects caused by the disaster. Following the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011, local disaster aid workers had overworked for months, and many workers eventually died by suicide. Although many workplaces suffered this dual damage, there is limited literature on psychosocial postvention in this context. This study reports the activities of individual/group postventions provided to these aid workers. The bereaved person expressed grief for the loss of their colleagues and anger for not being protected. The postvention observed unusual and distinctive group dynamics. It was essential for mental health professionals to address 2 types of traumatic exposures in the group programs —trauma from the disaster and their colleagues’ deaths due to suicide. These postvention programs might be beneficial in maintaining aid workers’ mental health and helping them cope with the loss of their colleagues.

Type
Report from the Field
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stroebe, MS, Hansson, RO, Schut, H, et al. Bereavement research: cotemporary perspectives. In: Stroebe, MS, Hansson, RO, Schut, H, et al., eds. Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention. American Psychological Association; 2008:3-25.Google Scholar
Pitman, A, Osborn, D, King, M, et al. Effects of suicide bereavement on mental health and suicide risk. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(1);86-94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sveen, C-A, Walby, FA. Suicide survivor’s mental health and grief reaction: a systematic review of controlled studies. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2008;38(1):13-29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andriessen, K. Can postvention be prevention? Crisis. 2009;30(1):43-47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linde, K, Treml, J, Steinig, J, et al. (2017). Grief interventions for people bereaved by suicide: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyagi Disaster Mental Health Care Center. The road to the establishment of the center [Japanese]. Accessed May 23, 2022. http://miyagi-kokoro.org/media/files/%E6%B4%BB%E5%8B%95%E7%B4%B9%E4%BB%8B_202012.pdf Google Scholar
McIntosh, J, Bolton, I, Andriessen, K, et al. (2017). History of survivor support. In: Andriessen, K, Krysinska, K, Grad, OT, eds. Postvention in Action: The International Handbook of Suicide Bereavement Support. Hogrefe Publishing; 2017:101-116.Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. Characteristics and effectiveness of suicide survivors groups. In: Andriessen, K, Krysinska, K, Grad, OT, eds. Postvention in Action: The International Handbook of Suicide Bereavement Support. Hogrefe Publishing; 2017:101-116.Google Scholar
Thomas, SS, Rainey, JS. Workplaces and the aftermath of suicide. In: Andriessen, K, Krysinska, K, Grad, OT, eds. Postvention in Action: The International Handbook of Suicide Bereavement Support. Hogrefe Publishing; 2017:174-183.Google Scholar
Andriessen, K, Krysinska, K, Kõlves, K, et al. Suicide postvention service models and guidelines 2014-2019: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed