Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T00:04:46.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical Response, Outbreak Investigation, and Epidemiology of the Fungal Meningitis Epidemic in the United States: Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Kaja M. Abbas*
Affiliation:
Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
Nargesalsadat Dorratoltaj
Affiliation:
Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
Margaret L. O’Dell
Affiliation:
New River Health District, Virginia Department of Health, Christiansburg, Virginia
Paige Bordwine
Affiliation:
New River Health District, Virginia Department of Health, Christiansburg, Virginia
Thomas M. Kerkering
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.
Kerry J. Redican
Affiliation:
Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Kaja M. Abbas, Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 (e-mail: kaja.abbas@vt.edu).

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the 2012–2013 multistate fungal meningitis epidemic in the United States from the perspectives of clinical response, outbreak investigation, and epidemiology. Articles focused on clinical response, outbreak investigation, and epidemiology were included, whereas articles focused on compounding pharmacies, legislation and litigation, diagnostics, microbiology, and pathogenesis were excluded. We reviewed 19 articles by use of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. The source of the fungal meningitis outbreak was traced to the New England Compounding Center in Massachusetts, where injectable methylprednisolone acetate products were contaminated with the predominant pathogen, Exserohilum rostratum. As of October 23, 2013, the final case count stood at 751 patients and 64 deaths, and no additional cases are anticipated. The multisectoral public health response to the fungal meningitis epidemic from the hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, and the public health system at the local, state, and federal levels led to an efficient epidemiological investigation to trace the outbreak source and rapid implementation of multiple response plans. This systematic review reaffirms the effective execution of a multisectoral public health response and efficient delivery of the core functions of public health assessment, policy development, and service assurances to improve population health.(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:145–151)

Type
Systematic Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. CDC. Multistate outbreak of fungal infection associated with injection of methylprednisolone acetate solution from a single compounding pharmacy - United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(41):839-842.Google Scholar
2. Kainer, MA, Reagan, DR, Nguyen, DB, et al. Fungal infections associated with contaminated methylprednisolone in Tennessee. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):2194-2203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1212972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. CDC. Multistate fungal meningitis outbreak—interim guidance for treatment. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(41).Google Scholar
4. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Kauffman, CA, Pappas, PG, Patterson, TF. Fungal infections associated with contaminated methylprednisolone injections. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(26):2495-2500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1212617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Traynor, K. Meningitis outbreak challenges hospital pharmacies. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012;69(23):2024-2026. http://dx.doi.org/10.2146/news120081.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Kerkering, TM, Grifasi, ML, Baffoe-Bonnie, AW, et al. Early clinical observations in prospectively followed patients with fungal meningitis related to contaminated epidural steroid injections. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):154-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00568.Google Scholar
8. McKinney, M. Battlefront. Michigan hospital at forefront in national fight against outbreak from tainted injections. Mod Healthc. 2012;42(47).Google ScholarPubMed
9. Kuehn, BM. Hospital faces uncertainty as it copes with surge of patients with fungal meningitis. JAMA. 2013;309(3):219-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.187705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Malani, AN, Vandenberg, DM, Singal, B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening to identify spinal and paraspinal infections associated with injections of contaminated methylprednisolone acetate. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2465-2472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.6293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Moudgal, V, Singal, B, Kauffman, CA, et al. Spinal and paraspinal fungal infections associated with contaminated methylprednisolone injections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014;1(1):ofu022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofu022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Pappas, PG. Lessons learned in the multistate fungal infection outbreak in the United States. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013;26(6):545-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Bell, BP, Khabbaz, RF. Responding to the outbreak of invasive fungal infections: the value of public health to Americans. JAMA. 2013;309(9):883-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Todd, B. Fungal meningitis outbreak. Am J Nurs. 2013;113(2):52-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000426691.81083.93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Corvese, K, Forlano, L, Gibson, L. A hybrid strategy for surveillance of individuals potentially exposed to contaminated methylprednisolone acetate—Virginia, 2012. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;19(4):289-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e318294e603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Chiller, TM, Roy, M, Nguyen, D, et al. Clinical findings for fungal infections caused by methylprednisolone injections. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(17):1610-1619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1304879.Google Scholar
17. Smith, RM, Schaefer, MK, Kainer, MA, et al. Fungal infections associated with contaminated methylprednisolone injections. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(17):1598-1609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1213978.Google Scholar
18. CDC. Spinal and paraspinal infections associated with contaminated methylprednisolone acetate injections - Michigan, 2012-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(19):377-381.Google Scholar
19. CDC. Notes from the field: department of Defense response to a multistate outbreak of fungal meningitis—United States, October 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(38):800-801.Google Scholar
20. CDC. Multistate outbreak of fungal meningitis and other infections. CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/outbreaks/meningitis.html. Accessed April 30, 2015.Google Scholar
21. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988. http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/1988/The-Future-of-Public-Health.aspx. Accessed November 10, 2015.Google Scholar
22. Institute of Medicine. The Future of the Public’s Health in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002. http://iom.edu/Reports/2002/The-Future-of-the-Publics-Health-in-the-21st-Century.aspx. Accessed July 3, 2014.Google Scholar