Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:55:36.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Defeat Is Not So Frequent*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Tom Settle
Affiliation:
University of Guelph

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Knaster, Stephen M., “How the Self-Defeating Argument Against Determinism Defeats Itself, Dialogue 25/2 (Summer 1986), 239244CrossRefGoogle Scholar. References in the text are to this paper.

2 Jordan, James, “Determinism's Dilemma”, The Review of Metaphysics 23/1 (1969), 4866Google Scholar.

3 Ayer, A. J., The Concept of the Person (London: MacMillan, 1963), 266267CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Jordan, “Determinism's Dilemma”, 60–63.

5 Ibid., 54.

7 See my “Presuppositions of Propensity Theories of Probability”, in Maxwell, G., Anderston, R. M. Jr, eds., Induction, Probability, and Confirmation (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1982)Google Scholar.

8 See further my “Human Freedom and 1568 Versions of Determinism and Indeterminism”, in Bunge, M., ed., The Methodological Unity of Science (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1975), 245264;Google ScholarIndeterminism Undermines Science”, Fundamenta Scientiae 3/1 (1973), 103112Google Scholar.