Badici, Emil 2008 “On the Compatibility between Euclidean Geometry and Hume’s Denial of Infinite Divisibility,” Hume Studies Volume 34, Number 2,
Barrow, Isaac 1683  The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning Explained and Demonstrated. tr. Kirkby, John, London: Angel and Bible in St. Paul’s Churchyard.
Baum, Robert 1972 “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 3, 2.
Berkeley, George 1734  A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous, ed., Turbayne, Colin Murray, Kansas City: Bobbs Merill,
Berkeley, George 1705  Philosophical Works, , Ayers, M. R., London: Dents and Sons.
Berkeley, George 1732  Alciphron or the Minute Philosopher in Works, ed. Fraser, A.C., Vol II, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berkeley, George 1734 [1948-1957] The Analyst, edited Luce, A. A., in , vol. 4, London: Nelson and Sons.
Berkeley, George 1732  Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision. in Works on Vision, ed. Turbayne, Colin Murray, Indianapolis: Bobbs Merill.
Bracken, Harry 1987 “On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4. 4.
Coffa, Alberto 1986 “From Geometry to Tolerance,” In From Quarks to Quasars, , Vol. 7, ed. Colodny, Robert G., Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.
Cohen, Morris R. and Nagel, Ernest 1934 Logic and Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Descartes, Rene 1637  Discourse on Method, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothof, Robert, Muerdoch, Dugald, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Detlefsen, Michael 2005 “Formalism,” in Shapiro, Stewart ed. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downing, Lisa 1995 “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3, 2.
Einstein, Albert 1921  “Lecture before the Prussian Academy of Sciences, January 27.” Expanded and reprinted in Sidelights on Relativity, Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger.
Euclid, 1956 The Thirteen Books of the Elements, Vol. 1, translated by Heath, Sir Thomas, New York: Dover.
Fogelein, Robert 1988 “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility,” Philosophical Review 97, 1.
Frege, Gottlob 1980 Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galilei, Galileo 1638  Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, trans. Stillman, , Drake, . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hall, Rupert, and Boas, Marie 1970 “Newton and the Theory of Matter,” in The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton, edited Palter, Robert, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hume, David 1740  A Treatise of Human Nature, ed., Selby BiggeL, A. L, A., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jesseph, Douglas M. 1993 Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leibniz, Gottfried 1677  “Dialogue on the Connection between Things and Words,” in Philosophic Papers and Letters, Vol. 2, Ed. Loemker, Leroy E., Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Manders, Kenneth 1995  “The Euclidean Diagram,” in Mancosu, Paolo, ed., The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McMullin, Ernest 1985 “Galilean Idealization,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 16, 3.
Mueller, Ian 1981 Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Proclus, 1970 A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements, trans. Morrow, Glenn R., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pycior, Helen M. 1987 “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley,” Journal of the History of Ideas 48, 2.
Raynor, David 1980 “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume,” Dialogue 19, 2.
Sepkoski, David 2005 “Nominalism and Constructivism in Seventeenth-Century Mathematical Philosophy,” Historia Mathematica 32.
Sherry, David 1993 “Don’t Take Me Half the Way, On Berkeley On Mathematical Reasoning,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 24, 2.
Storrie, Stefan 2012 “What is it the unbodied spirit cannot do? Berkeley and Barrow on the nature of geometrical construction,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2. 2.
Szabo, Zoltan 1995 “Berkeley’s Triangle,” History of Philosophy Quarterly Vol. 12, No. 1.
Warnock, G.J. 1953 Berkeley, Baltimore: Penguin, 1953.
Weisberg, Michael 2007 “Three kinds of Idealization,” The Journal of Philosophy CIV, 12.