Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Berkeley and Proof in Geometry

  • RICHARD J. BROOK (a1)

Abstract

Berkeley in his Introduction to the Principles of Human knowledge uses geometrical examples to illustrate a way of generating “universal ideas,” which allegedly account for the existence of general terms. In doing proofs we might, for example, selectively attend to the triangular shape of a diagram. Presumably what we prove using just that property applies to all triangles.

I contend, rather, that given Berkeley’s view of extension, no Euclidean triangles exist to attend to. Rather proof, as Berkeley would normally assume, requires idealizing diagrams; treating them as if they obeyed Euclidean constraints. This convention solves the problem of representative generalization.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Badici, Emil 2008On the Compatibility between Euclidean Geometry and Hume’s Denial of Infinite Divisibility,” Hume Studies Volume 34, Number 2,
Barrow, Isaac 1683 [1734] The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning Explained and Demonstrated. tr. Kirkby, John, London: Angel and Bible in St. Paul’s Churchyard.
Baum, Robert 1972The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 3, 2.
Berkeley, George 1734 [1965] A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous, ed., Turbayne, Colin Murray, Kansas City: Bobbs Merill,
Berkeley, George 1705 [1975] Philosophical Works, Introduction, Ayers, M. R., London: Dents and Sons.
Berkeley, George 1732 [1871] Alciphron or the Minute Philosopher in Works, ed. Fraser, A.C., Vol II, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berkeley, George 1734 [1948-1957] The Analyst, edited Luce, A. A., in Works, vol. 4, London: Nelson and Sons.
Berkeley, George 1732 [1963] Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision. in Works on Vision, ed. Turbayne, Colin Murray, Indianapolis: Bobbs Merill.
Bracken, Harry 1987On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4. 4.
Coffa, Alberto 1986From Geometry to Tolerance,” In From Quarks to Quasars, University of Pittsburg Series in the Philosophy of Physics, Vol. 7, ed. Colodny, Robert G., Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.
Cohen, Morris R. and Nagel, Ernest 1934 Logic and Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Descartes, Rene 1637 [1985] Discourse on Method, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothof, Robert, Muerdoch, Dugald, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Detlefsen, Michael 2005Formalism,” in Shapiro, Stewart ed. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downing, Lisa 1995Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3, 2.
Einstein, Albert 1921 [2010] “Lecture before the Prussian Academy of Sciences, January 27.” Expanded and reprinted in Sidelights on Relativity, Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger.
Euclid, 1956 The Thirteen Books of the Elements, Vol. 1, (Books I and II) translated by Heath, Sir Thomas, New York: Dover.
Fogelein, Robert 1988Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility,” Philosophical Review 97, 1.
Frege, Gottlob 1980 Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galilei, Galileo 1638 [1974] Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, trans. Stillman, , Drake, . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hall, Rupert, and Boas, Marie 1970Newton and the Theory of Matter,” in The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton, edited Palter, Robert, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hume, David 1740 [1888] A Treatise of Human Nature, ed., Selby BiggeL, A. L, A., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jesseph, Douglas M. 1993 Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leibniz, Gottfried 1677 [1969] “Dialogue on the Connection between Things and Words,” in Philosophic Papers and Letters, Vol. 2, Ed. Loemker, Leroy E., Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Manders, Kenneth 1995 [2007] “The Euclidean Diagram,” in Mancosu, Paolo, ed., The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McMullin, Ernest 1985Galilean Idealization,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 16, 3.
Mueller, Ian 1981 Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Proclus, 1970 A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements, trans. Morrow, Glenn R., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pycior, Helen M. 1987Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley,” Journal of the History of Ideas 48, 2.
Raynor, David 1980Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume,” Dialogue 19, 2.
Sepkoski, David 2005Nominalism and Constructivism in Seventeenth-Century Mathematical Philosophy,” Historia Mathematica 32.
Sherry, David 1993Don’t Take Me Half the Way, On Berkeley On Mathematical Reasoning,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 24, 2.
Storrie, Stefan 2012What is it the unbodied spirit cannot do? Berkeley and Barrow on the nature of geometrical construction,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2. 2.
Szabo, Zoltan 1995Berkeley’s Triangle,” History of Philosophy Quarterly Vol. 12, No. 1.
Warnock, G.J. 1953 Berkeley, Baltimore: Penguin, 1953.
Weisberg, Michael 2007Three kinds of Idealization,” The Journal of Philosophy CIV, 12.

Berkeley and Proof in Geometry

  • RICHARD J. BROOK (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed