Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:21:21.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parental and professional agreement in developmental assessment of very-low-birthweight and term infants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2000

Andrea Heiser
Affiliation:
Department of Neonatology, Charité Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver Curcin
Affiliation:
Department of Neonatology, Charité Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Catharina Luhr
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Charité Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Ingrid Grimmer
Affiliation:
Department of Social Paediatrics, Charité Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Boris Metze
Affiliation:
Department of Neonatology, Charité Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Michael Obladen
Affiliation:
Department of Neonatology, Charité Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this prospective follow-up study was to evaluate the accuracy of a parent-completed questionnaire compared with professionally detected developmental delay. Parents of 108 very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants and parents of 279 term control infants completed the German version of the Revised Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire (R-PDQ) at the corrected age of 12 months. Simultaneously, infants underwent developmental examination using the Griffiths Developmental Scale. Sixty-nine VLBW infants were classified as not delayed, 16 as delayed by both methods (conegativity 76% and copositivity 94%), as compared to 240 and six term control infants (conegativity 88%, copositivity 94%). The questionnaire suggested delay in 22 VLBW infants and 32 control infants, which was not substantiated by professional examination (P=0.006). In contrast, examination-diagnosed delay was missed by the questionnaire in one infant in each group. The R-PDQ is a reliable monitoring instrument for both VLBW and term infants at the age of 12 months. Parents of VLBW infants tend to underestimate their infants' development.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2000 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)