Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:14:04.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paediatric quality of life instruments: a review of the impact of the conceptual framework on outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2006

Elise Davis
Affiliation:
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Elizabeth Waters
Affiliation:
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew Mackinnon
Affiliation:
Centre for Medical Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Dinah Reddihough
Affiliation:
Department of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia.
H Kerr Graham
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia.
Ozlem Mehmet-Radji
Affiliation:
Royal Children's Hospital, Australia.
Roslyn Boyd
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

With an increasing number of paediatric quality of life (QOL) instruments being developed, it is becoming difficult for researchers and clinicians to select the most appropriate instrument. Reviews of QOL instruments tend to report only basic properties of the instruments such as domains and psychometric properties. This paper seeks to appraise critically the conceptual underpinnings of paediatric QOL instruments. A systematic review was conducted to identify QOL instruments for children aged 0 to 12 years, and to examine and compare their conceptual frameworks, definitions employed, and structure. Both generic and condition-specific measures were reviewed. Fourteen generic and 25 condition-specific QOL instruments were identified. Eleven types of definition of QOL and health-related QOL and three theories of QOL were identified. QOL was measured by a variety of domains including emotional, social and physical health, and well-being. Items commonly assessed difficulties, or intensity/frequency of feelings/symptoms, in contrast to positive aspects of life and happiness. The findings highlight the diversity that is apparent in the conceptualization of paediatric QOL and draw attention to the lack of empirical evidence for many of the fundamental assumptions. The impact of the conceptual underpinnings of the instruments on the resulting QOL scores is discussed.

Type
Review
Copyright
2006 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)