Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T10:31:24.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Current State of Dance Micro and Macro Policies in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

Abstract

Cultural policies, understood as acts of intervention, not only from the State, but also from social groups and institutions, trigger devices that highlight the complexity of the cultural system and power relationships. These acts, developed in a participatory manner, can contribute to the global re-politicization of collective life.

Regarding Brazil, we can assert the search for common spaces has grown in importance under president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's administration (2003–2010), when cultural policies suffered a significant change with the implementation of an inclusive and participatory model. This led to sectorial policies and the creation of public spaces for the representation of civil society. The field of dance took an active role in this process through its associations and regional forums, leading to the creation of a Dance Sectorial Collegiate and a Dance Federal Plan.

Despite some progress that has been made, cultural policies in Brazil are still under the strong influence of a neoliberal approach, which centers its efforts in economic development with a focus on public funding to culture and the creation of funding laws. A participative construction of public policy for dance would be based on agreements between civil society and government, going beyond the financing of arts through grants. The area of dance in Brazil needs structuring programs and actions that would collaborate with the organizational and productive modes of people and groups that are working to develop the area. Thus, this paper discusses cultural policies of dance by pointing out the consequences of “fast-cult” dance production and identifies spaces of resistance and micro-politics, generated by Brazilian artists who are seeking sustainable development and collaborative modes of production in dance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Lucia Matos 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Brasil. 2007. Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais: Perfil dos Municípios Brasileiros: Cultura—2006. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística/ IBGE: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão.Google Scholar
Brasil. 2010. Plano Setorial de Dança. Ministério da Cultura. Brasília: CNPC.Google Scholar
Canclini, Nestor García. 2001. Definiciones en Transición. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Conversações. São Paulo: Ed. 34.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guatarri, Félix. 1995. Mil platôs: Capitalismo e Esquizofrenia. Vol. 2. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. 34.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 2008. Nascimento da Biopolítica. SP: Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
Guatarri, Félix, and Rolnik, Suely 1996. Micropolíticas: Cartografias do Desejo. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.Google Scholar
Matos, Lúcia. 2011. “Thinking and Working in a Network: The Contribution of Social Dance Networks in Brazil and Latin America to the Enactment of Cultural and Educational Policies for Dance. In Proceedings of the 2010 World Dance Alliance Global Summit. Vol. 1, 1–8. http://www.twu.edu/dance/world-dance-alliance-proceedings.asp. Accessed August 4, 2013.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2005. “Política da arte.” Seminário São Paulo S.A.: Práticas Estéticas, Sociais e Políticas em Debate. http://www.sescsp.org.br/sesc/conferencias. Accessed November 12, 2010.Google Scholar
Rubim, Antônio. 2007. “Políticas Culturais do Governo Lula/Gil: Desafios e Enfrentamentos.” III ENECULT—UFBA. http://www.cult.ufba.br/enecult2007/AlbinoRubim.pdf. Accessed September 16, 2013.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura S., and Avritzer, L., eds. 2003. Democratizar a Democracia. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Scherer-Warren, Ilse. 2006. “Das Mobilizações às Redes de Movimentos Sociais. Sociedade e Estado 21(1): 109–30.Google Scholar
Segnini, Lilian. 2010. “Formação Profissional e Trabalho nas Narrativas de Artistas Selecionados.” Programa Rumos Itaú Cultural Dança edição 2009/2011. São Paulo: Itaú Cultural. Disponível em. http://novo.itaucultural.org.br. Accessed March 11, 2013.Google Scholar