Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T13:31:57.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theorizing Hybridity and Identity: The “Edge-Effect” and “Dynamic Nucleus” in Bharatanatyam-Inspired Contemporary Dances of Two Choreographers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Abstract

Dancer-choreographer Nova Bhattacharya uses the ecological term “edge-effect” to describe her experience within the choreographic process where her bharatanatyam training and her contemporary dance creativity overlap to create a lingua franca. Hari Krishnan, dancer-choreographer and scholar, describes his work as “constantly ruptured” within his “post-post-modern experience.” This paper argues that the creative processes underlying the respective contemporary dance-making practices of Nova Bhattacharya and Hari Krishnan are cultural ecosystems demonstrating the rich dynamic of the edge-effect at the intersection of bharatanatyam and contemporary dance aesthetics and themes. Within the edge-effect, both reception and rupture occur as artistic identities evolve. Furthermore, reception and rupture occur within the performance venue as the performers' and audiences' worlds overlap—another negotiated edge-effect. While the ecological metaphor of the edge-effect helps to conceptualize these interactive spaces, the sociological metaphor of a “dynamic nucleus” (Lloyd Wong) helps us to theorize the nature and energy of the critically reflective exchanges occurring, between contemporary and bharatanatyam sensibilities, in both the studio and concert theater. The edge-effect and dynamic nucleus metaphors build on Homi Bhaha's concept of the “cultural interstices” within which individual and communal identities are initiated and culture is located. Additionally, these metaphors expand on Guillermo Gômez-Peña's theory of “multihybrid identities, in a constant process of metamorphosis” as today's “border-culture” becomes tomorrow's institutional art. This paper provides dance scholars with a way of conceptualizing the energy of dance as a cultural force influencing experiences of hybridity and identity for performers and audiences within intercultural contexts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cheryl LaFrance 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brunsma, David L., and Delgado, Daniel J.. 2009. “Occupying Third Space: Hybridity and Identity Matrices in the Multicultural Experience.” In Hybrid Identities: Theoretical and Empirical Examinations, edited by Leavy, Patricia and Smith, Keri E. Iyall. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Gómez-Peña, Guillermo. 1995. “On the Threshold of a New Decade: The End-of-the-Century Society.” In Looking Out: Perspectives on Dance and Criticism in a Multicultural World, edited by Gere, David. New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
Iyall Smith, Keri E. 2009. “Hybrid Identities: Theoretical Examinations.” In Hybrid Identities: Theoretical and Empirical Examinations, edited by Leavy, Patricia and Iyall Smith, Keri E.. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Hari. 2007. mea culpa. Program notes. Toronto Dance Theatre, Toronto, May 23–26.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Hari. 2010. Box. Program notes. Fleck Dance Theatre, Toronto, March 18–20.Google Scholar
Wong, Lloyd. 2008. “Multiculturalism and Ethnic Pluralism in Sociology: An Analysis of the Fragmentation Position Discourse.” Canadian Ethnic Studies 40(1) (np). Retrieved October 29, 2010, from Project Muse.Google Scholar