Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:28:05.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women and Capitalism: Oppression or Emancipation? A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Janet Thomas
Janet Thomas
Affiliation:
University of Keele
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the last few years, work in social history and the history of women has centred on the transition to capitalism and the great bourgeois political revolutions—also variously described as industrialization, urbanisation, and modernisation. Throughout this work runs a steady debate about the improvement or deterioration brought about by these changes in the lives of women and working people. On the whole, sociologists of the 1960s and early 1970s and many recent historians have been optimistic about the changes in women's position, while feminist and Marxist scholars have taken a much more gloomy view.1 There has been little debate between the two sides, yet the same opposed arguments about the impact of capitalism on the status of women crop up not only in accounts of Britain from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century, but also in work on women in the Third World, and cry out for critical assessment.

Type
Inventing Women's Roles
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 534 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, S 1976. ‘Women's Work in Nineteenth Century London: A Study of the Years 1820–50,’ in The Rights and Wrongs of Women, Mitchell, J. and Oakley, A., eds., pp. 59–111. London:Penguin.Google Scholar
Anderson, M 1971. Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, M 1980. Women's Oppression Today. London:Verso and N.L.B.Google Scholar
Barrett, M 1984. ‘Rethinking Women's Oppression: A Reply to Brenner and Ramas.’ New Left Review, 146 (07–08 1984), 123–8.Google Scholar
Boserup, E 1970. Women's Role in Economic Development. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, J, and Ramas, M 1984. ‘Rethinking Women's Oppression.’ New Left Review, 144 (03–04), 37–71.Google Scholar
Bridenthal, R, and Koontz, C 1977. Becoming Visible: Women in European History. Boston.Google Scholar
Clark, A 1982 [1919]. Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coleman, D 1955–56. ‘Labour in the English Economy of the Seventeenth Century.’ Economic History Review, Second series, 8:3, 280–95.Google Scholar
Figes, E 1970. Patriarchal Attitudes. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Flandrin, J. L. 1979. Families in Former Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedl, E 1967. ‘The Position of Women: Appearance and Reality.’ Anthropological Quarterly, 40: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, W. J. 1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J 1976. Production and Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R 1978. The Liberation of Women. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hartwell, R. M. 1971. The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hilton, R. H. 1975. The English Peasantry in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holcombe, Lee. 1983. Wives and Property. Oxford: Martin Robertson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K 1976. Capital. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
McFarlane, A 1978. The Origins of English Individualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McKendrick, N 1974. ‘Home Demand and Economic Growth: A New View of the Role of Women and Children in the Industrial Revolution,’in Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honour of J. H. Plumb, McKendrick, N., ed. Europa.Google Scholar
Medick, H 1976. ‘The Proto-Industrial Family Economy: The Structural Function of Household and Family during the Transition from Peasant Society to Industrial Capitalism.’ Social History, 3: 291–315.Google Scholar
Michaelson, E, and Goldschmidt, W 1971. ‘Female Roles and Male Dominance among Peasants.’ South Western Journal of Anthropology, 27: 330–52.Google Scholar
Middleton, C 1979. ‘The Sexual Division of Labour in Feudal England.’ New Left Review, 113–14, 147–68.Google Scholar
Nelson, C 1974. ‘Public and Private Politics: Women in the Middle Eastern World,’ American Ethnologist, 1:3, 551–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A 1974. The Sociology of Housework. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Oakely, A 1976. Housewife. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Oakely, A 1979. ‘Sexism in Official Statistics,’ in Irvine, J.Miles, I., and Evans, J., eds., Demystifying Social Statistics. Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Oren, L 1974. ‘The Welfare of Women in Labouring Families: England, 1860–1950,’in Clio's Consciousness Raised, Hartmann, M. and Banner, L. W., eds. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pahl, R 1984. Divisions of Labour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perkin, H 1969. The Origins of Modern English Society, 1780–1880. London: Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pinchbeck, I 1969 [1930]. Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1880. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Reiter, R 1975. ‘Men and Women in the South of France: Public and Private Domains,’ in Towards an Anthropology of Women, Reiter, R., ed. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Richards, E 1974. ‘Women in the British Economy since 1700: An Interpretation.’ History, 59: 337–57.Google Scholar
Roberts, E 1984. A Woman's Place. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rogers, B 1981. The Domestication of Women. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Rogers, S 1975. ‘Female Forms of Power and the Myth of Male Dominance: A Model of Female/Male Interaction in Peasant Society.’ American Ethnologist, 1975, 727–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, K 1975. ‘Engels Revisited,’ in Toward an Anthropology of Women, Reiter, R., ed., 211–34. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. W., and Tilly, L. A. 1975. ‘Women's Work and the Family in Nineteenth Century Europe.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17:1, 36–64.Google Scholar
Also in Sociology of the Family, Anderson, M., ed. London: Penguin. References to reprint in M. Anderson.Google Scholar
Shorter, E 1975. The Making of the Modern Family. Huntington N. Y.: Fontana.Google Scholar
Shorter, E 1976. ‘Women's Work—What Difference Did Capitalism Make?’ Theory and Society, 3:513–27.Google Scholar
Snell, K. D. M. 1980. ‘Agricultural Seasonal Unemployment, the Standard of Living, and Women's Work in the South and East, 1690–1860.’ Economic History Review, 407–37.Google Scholar
Stacey, M, and Price, M 1981. Women, Power and Politics. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Stone, L 1979. The Family, Sex and Marriage in Britain, 1500–1800. Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
Thompson, E P. 1979. ‘The Grid of Inheritance: A Comment,’ in Family and Inheritance, Goody, J.Thirsk, J.Thompson, E. P., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A 1984. ‘'I'm Hungry, Mum': The Politics of Domestic Budgeting,’in Of Marriage and the Market, Young, K.Walkowitz, C., and McCullagh, R., eds. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wolf, M 1974. ‘Chinese Women: Old Skills in a New Context,’ in Women, Culture and Society, Rosaldo, M. and Lamphere, L., eds. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 157–72.Google Scholar
Young, M, and Wilmott, P 1973. The Symmetrical Family. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. References to Penguin edition, 1975.Google Scholar