Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T06:45:43.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the Intellectual History of Ethnology and other Social Sciences in Yugoslavia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Joel M. Halpern
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts
E. A. Hammel
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Extract

As anthropologists turn increasingly to the study of complex societies, they are led to reflect on the role that social science plays in national ideologies and the ways in which the current state and development of social science reflect other cultural states and processes. Indeed, such reflections can usefully be turned on our own society. One sees that it is much more appropriate to discard old notions of the distinction between ‘science’ and ‘folklore’ and to regard the social science of a particular society, however sophisticated and presumably objective, as an important part of its subjective ideology about itself and the world and thus a part of its own folk theory about the relations of man to society and of men to men. This paper is a sketch of some of the interrelationships between Yugoslav social science and other aspects of Yugoslav culture, with primary emphasis on ethnology.

Type
Ideology in Social Science
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bogišić, Valtazar (1874), Zborniku sadašnjih pravnih običaja u Južrtih Slavena. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska Akademija.Google Scholar
Cvijić, Jovan (1918), La Péninsule balkanique, Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Cvijić, Jovan and Radonič, J., et al. (1919), La Question du Banat, de la Batchka et de la Baranja. Paris.Google Scholar
Cvijič, Jovan (1922, 1931), Balkansko Poluostrvo i južnoslavenske zemlje, vol. I and II. Beograd.Google Scholar
Georgevitch, Tihomir (1918), Macedonia. London: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
Gluščević, Manojlo (1963), ‘Etnografija, etnologija i antropologija’, Sociologija, 5 (3–4),2150Google Scholar
Halpern, Joel (1967), ‘Studies in Peasant Society’, in Siegel, Bernard, ed., Biennial Review of Anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammel, E. A. (1964), ‘Culture as an Information System’. Papers of the Kroeber Anthropological Society, 31, 8391.Google Scholar
Jackson, George (1966), Comintern and Peasant in East Europe, 1919-1930. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kulišič, Špiro (1967), ‘Neka shvatanja i neke tendencije u našoj savremenoj etnologiji’, Sociologija, 9 (1), 7584.Google Scholar
Lederer, Ivo (1963), Yugoslavia at the Paris Peace Conference—A Study in Frontier-making. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lukić, Radomir (1959), ‘Društveni uslovi razvoja sociologije u Jugoslaviji’, Sociologija, 1 (2–3), 99113.Google Scholar
Lukić, Radomir(1961), ‘Odnos izmedju marksističke i buržoaske sociologije’, Sociologija, 3 (2), 2334.Google Scholar
Marković, Mihailo (1965), ‘Opšti metodološki problemi drustvenih nauka u našoj zemlji’, Sociologija, 7 (2), 520.Google Scholar
McClellan, Woodford (1964), Svetozar Marković and the origins of Balkan Socialism Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mitrany, David (1961), Marx against the Peasant, a Study in Social Dogmatism. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Radić, Antun (1929), Osnova za sabiranje i proučavanje gradje o narodnom zivotu. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska Akademija.Google Scholar
Tomasić, Dinko (1948), Personality and Culture in Eastern European Politics. New York.Google Scholar
Ward, Benjamin (1967), ‘Marxism-Horvatism: a Yugoslav Theory of Socialism’, The American Economic Review, 3, 509–23.Google Scholar