Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T17:45:48.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Myth of Cultural Homogeneity and Its Implications for Chiefly Power and Politics in Fiji

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Stephanie Lawson
Affiliation:
The University of New England, Australia

Extract

Since Fiji's independence in 1970, a chiefly establishment drawn largely from the eastern regions of the island group has dominated the government there and, through the Alliance Party, has managed, in one way or another, to retain power in successive electoral contests until its outright defeat in the general elections of April 1987. The new government comprised a coalition of the National Federation Party (NFP), supported largely by the Fiji Indian community, and the Fiji Labour Party, which was essentially multiracial. Before the elections, Dr. Timoci Bavadra, the Labour leader, had been chosen to head the coalition. An indigenous Fijian “commoner” from the western region of Fiji, Bavadra's victory in April 1987 represented a break in a long history of eastern chiefly political predominance established and consolidated under colonial rule, and carried forward into the modern context of post-independence politics.

Type
The Politics of Cultural Continuity
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For an account of the plural society syndrome and its operation in Fiji, see Hagan, Stephanie, “The Party System, the Labour Party and the Plural Society Syndrome in Fiji,” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 15:2 (07 1987), 126–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 The term “political legitimacy” in a broad context is taken to denote “the authority of the state, its right to our allegiance.” See Taylor, Charles, “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man,” in The Philosophy of Society, Beehler, Rodger and Drengson, Alan R., eds. (London: Methuen, 1978), 184.Google Scholar

3 See for example Hagan, Stephanie, “Race, Politics, and the Coup in Fiji”Google Scholar and Fossen, A. B. van, “Two Military Coups in Fiji,” both in Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 19:4, (1012 1987).Google Scholar

4 Baba, Tupeni, “Developments in Fiji Since the Second Coup” (paper presented to a conference on Human Rights in the South Pacific sponsored by the H. V. Evart Foundation, Sydney, November 1987), 5. Tupeni Baba was a minister in the deposed government.Google Scholar

5 I here take Bentley's point that only a crude instrumentalist perspective on the use of ethnic symbolism identifies the systemic consequences of collective action with the conscious intentions of individual actors. I do not, therefore, simply assume that the politicization of ethnic symbols (or, in this specific case, the myth of cultural homogeneity), is necessarily the product of a clearly deliberate or conscious effort on the part of an elite to manipulate followers. Nonetheless, as Bentley indicates in his formulation of the practice theory of ethnicity, this obviously “does not preclude the possibility of individuals manipulating ethnic symbolism to their own advantage.” See Bentley, C. Carter, “Ethnicity and Practice,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 29:1 (01 1987), 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 For discussion of the various views of myth, see Leach, Edmund, ed., The Structural Study of Myth and Totemism (London: Tavistock, 1967)Google Scholar and Tudor, Henry, Political Myth (London: Macmillan, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Earle, Timothy, “The Evolution of Chiefdoms,” Current Anthropology, 30:1 (02 1989), 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Hobsbawm, Eric, in The Invention of Tradition, Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 1. Hobsbawm takes “invented tradition” to mean “a set of practices normally governed by overtly or tacitly accepted rules and of a ritual or symbolic nature, which seek to inculcate certain values and norms of behaviour by repetition, which automatically implies continuity with the past.”Google Scholar

9 Gravelle, Kim, Fiji's Times: A History of Fiji (Suva: Fiji Times and Herald, 1979), 7.Google Scholar See also France, Peter, The Charter of the Land (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1969), 45.Google Scholar

11 France, , The Charter, 8.Google Scholar

12 Calvert, James, Fiji and the Fijians, vol. 2 of Mission History, Rowe, G. S., ed. (London: Alexander Heylin, 1858), 6.Google Scholar

13 See Routledge, David, Matanitu: The Struggle for Power in Early Fiji (Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies, 1985),Google Scholar especially chs. 2 and 3. See also Young, John, “The Response of Lau to Foreign Contact,” Journal of Pacifc History, 17:1 (01 1982), 39.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 74.

15 Macnaught, T. J., The Fijian Colonial Experience: A Study of the Neotraditional Order under British Colonial Rule Prior to World War II (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1982), 2.Google Scholar

16 See Hagan, “Race, Politics and the Coup in Fiji,” 3.Google Scholar

17 Malinowski, B., quoted in Michael Walter, “An Examination of Hierarchical Notions in Fijian Society: A Test Case for the Applicability of the Term ‘Chief,’Oceania, 49:4 (19781979), 12.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., 2.

19 Norton, Robert, Race and Politics in Fiji (St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1977), 55.Google Scholar

20 See Durutalo, Simione, “Internal Colonialism and Unequal Regional Development: The Case of Western Viti Levu, Fiji” (M.A. Thesis, School of Social and Economic Development, University of the South Pacific, 1985), 80.Google Scholar See also Thompson, Laura, Southern Lau: An Ethnography (Bernice B. Bishop Museum Bulletin 162, Honolulu, 1940), 30, who notes that these influences affected the “priestly” class in particular after the missionaries had “waged a death struggle against god houses, priesthood… [resulting in] a psychological conflict which weakened the system of ancestor worship, the basis of the social system.”Google Scholar

21 Walter, , “Hierarchical Notions in Fijian Society,” 2.Google Scholar

22 Cf. Terence Ranger in Hobsbawm, and Ranger, , eds., The Invention of Tradition, 250–1.Google Scholar

23 Norton, , Race and Politics, 54.Google Scholar See also Thompson, , Southern Lau, 49, for a description of rituals and tabus surrounding chiefs in southern Lau.Google Scholar

24 Duratalo, , “Internal Colonialism,” 76.Google Scholar

25 Norton, , Race and Politics, 55.Google Scholar See also Brewster, A. B., The Hill Tribes of Fiji (London: Seeley, Service and Company, 1922), 22.Google Scholar

26 Fiji, , Legislative Council Debates (1918), 173,Google Scholar cited in Duratalo, , “Internal Colonialism,” 81.Google Scholar See also Thompson, , Southern Lau, 72.Google Scholar

27 Norton, , Race and Politics, 54.Google Scholar On the relative influence of Polynesian structures in the east, see Sayes, Shelley Ann, “Changing Paths of the Land: Early Political Hierarchies in Cakaudrove, Fiji,” Journal of Pacific History, 19:1 (1984), 3;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and for a general discussion on the relative differences between Polynesian and Melanesian sociopolitical structures, see Sahlins, Marshall, “Poor Man, Rich Man, Big Man, Chief: Political Types in Melanesia and Polynesia,” Comparative Stud?es in Society and History, 5:3 (1963), 285303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Thomas, Nicholas, “The Force of Ethnology: Origins and Significance of the Melanesia/Polynesia Division,” Current Anthropology, 30:1 (02 1989), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 See comments on Thomas by Abramson, Allen, Brady, Ivan, Green, R. C., Sahlins, Marshall, Stephenson, Rebecca A., Valjavec, Freidrich, and White, Ralph G., Current Anthropology, 30:1 (02 1989), 3440.Google Scholar

30 Scan, Deryck, Fiji: The Politics of Illusion: The Military Coups in Fiji (Kensington: New South Wales University Press, 1988), 3.Google Scholar

31 France, , The Charter, 108.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., 110.

33 See Mimer, G. B., “Introduction to G. K. Roth,” Fijian Way of Life, 2d ed. (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1973), xix.Google Scholar

34 Lasaqa, Isireli, The Fijian People (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1984), 18.Google Scholar

35 Ravuvu, Asesela, Vaka i Taukei: The Fijian Way of Life (Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies, 1983), 70.Google Scholar

36 See Routledge, , Matanitu, 30;Google ScholarFrance, , The Charter, ch. 7;Google Scholarc and Chapelle, Anthony, “Customary Tenure in Fiji,” Journal of Pacifc Studies, 2 (1978), especially 84–86.Google Scholar

37 Cato, A. C., “Malolo Island and Viseisei Village, Western Fiji,” Oceania, 22:2 (19511952), 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Capell, A. and Lester, R. H., “Local Divisions and Movements in Fiji,” Oceania, 11:4 (19401941), 318. This study offers additional evidence that the fundamental practical unit in eastern Fiji was the mataqali in that land was held vakamatagali (by the matagali), whereas in most of Viti Levu it was held by the smallest family division (p. 317).Google Scholar

39 Roth, , Fijian Way, 67.Google Scholar

40 For a more detailed discussion on this specific issue, see Clammer, John, “Colonialism and the Perception of Tradition in Fiji,” in Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter, Asad, T., ed. (London: Ithaca, 1973), 199220.Google Scholar

41 Macnaught, , The Fijian Colonial Experience, 3.Google Scholar

42 Nation, John, Customs of Respect: The Traditional Basis of Fijian Communal Politics (Canberra: Australian National University Development Studies Centre, 1978), 1.Google Scholar

43 Nayacakalou, R. R, Leadership in Fiji (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1975), 264.Google Scholar The most common honorific for a chief is “Ratu” for a male and “Adi” for a female, although paramount chiefs have other titles as well; for example, in some areas the title “Tui” designates the leader of a vanna or matanitu. See Keith-Reid, R., “The Role of the Chief,” Islands Business, 8:12 (12 1982), 20.Google Scholar

44 Nayacakalou, , Leadership in Fiji, 85.Google Scholar

45 See Hagan, , “Race, Politics and the Coup,” 45.Google Scholar

46 Sayes, , “Changing Paths of the Land,” 3.Google Scholar The quotation reproduced by Sayes is an extract from a statement made by Vakatora, Tomasi in Fiji Times, (4 December 1981), 8. Vakatora was at the time a minister in the Alliance government.Google Scholar

47 Powles, Charles, “The Persistence of Chiefly Power and its Implications for Law and Political Organisation in Western Polynesia” (Ph.D. Disser., Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 1979), Preface, vii–x.Google Scholar

48 Hamnett, Ian, Chieftainship and Legitimacy: An Anthropological Study of Executive Law in Lesotho (London: Routledge and Keegan Paul, 1975), 15.Google Scholar

50 See Nation, , Customs of Respect, 42.Google Scholar

51 Nayacakalou, , Leadership in Fiji, 31.Google Scholar

52 Fiji, , Department of Information, News Release no. 224 (21 March 1984).Google Scholar

53 Ibid., News Release no. 916 (16 November 1984).Google Scholar

54 Statement made in Fiji Times (1977),Google Scholar cited in Islands Business, 8:12 (12 1982), 20.Google Scholar

55 Hamnett, , Chieftainship and Legitimacy, 15.Google Scholar

56 Crocombe, Ron, The South Pacific: An Introduction (Auckland: Longman Paul, 1983), 49.Google Scholar

57 Ibid., 61.

58 Ibid., 72.

59 Cited in Philibert, Jean—Marc, “The Politics of Tradition: Toward a Generic Culture in Vanuatu,” Mankind, 16:1 (04 1986), 1.Google Scholar

61 See for example Durutalo, , “Internal Colonialism”;Google ScholarNorton, , Race and Politics in Fiji;Google Scholar and Chappele, A. J., “The Fijian Voice in Fiji's Colonial History,” Journal of Pac?c Studies, 1 (1975).Google Scholar

62 Fossen, Van, “Two Military Coups in Fiji,” 28.Google Scholar

63 Ibid., 27.

64 Griffin, C. C. M., “Thinker, Teller, Soldier, Seller… Language, Culture and Development in Fiji,” Pacific Perspective, 12:2 (1983), 13.Google Scholar

66 Norton, R., “Ethnic Divisions and Elite Conciliation,” in Politics in Fiji, Lal, Brij, ed. (North Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1986), 5764.Google Scholar

67 Editorial, , Jagriti (1 October 1966), quoted at 64.Google Scholar

69 Alley, R. M., “The Development of Political Parties in Fiji” (Ph.D. Disser., Department of Political Science, Victoria University, 1973), 20.Google Scholar

70 Ibid., 18–22.

71 See Hagan, , “Race, Politics and the Coup in Fiji,” 13.Google Scholar

72 Quoted in Scarr, , Fiji: The Politics of Illusion, 33.Google Scholar

73 The 1970 Constitution, which was published in English, was also not translated into Hindi, but the relevance of this, like many of the other factors dealt with here, is contextually determined; for it was Fijian fears of domination by Fiji Indians, and not vice versa, at issue. The 1970 Constitution provided guarantees of specifically Fijian rights and interests—not specifically Fiji Indian rights and interests—and fuller knowledge of these guarantees would have been of relevance in quieting Fijian fears, thereby blunting one of the rhetorical weapons available to the Alliance and, later, to the Taukei Movement and Rabuka.

74 Interview, Joeli Kalou (former Minister in the Bavadra government), in Suva (6 June 1986).

75 Fiji Sun, 17 November 1986, 4.Google Scholar

76 Text of Address by the Newly Elected President of the Fiji Labour Party, Timoci Bavadra, at the Party's Launching, reproduced in South Pacific Forum, 2:1 (07 1985), 74.Google Scholar

77 Robertson, Robert T. and Tamaisau, Akosita, Fiji: Shattered Coups (Leichardt: Pluto Press, 1988), 33.Google Scholar

78 Fiji Sun, 20 September 1986, 1.Google Scholar

79 Fiji Sun, 20 October 1986, 4.Google Scholar

80 Fiji Times, 14 March 1987, 1.Google Scholar

81 Fiji Sun, 4 April 1987, 4.Google Scholar

82 Fiji Times, 21 June 1986, 12.Google Scholar

83 Sunday Times (Fiji), 15 March 1987, 3.Google Scholar

84 Sunday Times (Fiji), 22 March 1987, 3.Google Scholar

85 Fiji Times, 31 March 1987, 12. Lau is the eastern province of which Mara is the paramount chief.Google Scholar

86 The Coalition polled 9.6 percent of the Fijian communal vote—an increase of 1.8 per cent over the comparable 1982 general election figure. Fijian communal support for the Alliance, however, dropped by 5.5 per cent. See Robertson, and Tamanisau, , Fiji: Shattered Coups, 60.Google Scholar

87 Fossen, Van “IWo Military Coups in Fiji,” 25.Google Scholar

88 For a detailed discussion of this particular problem, see Lawson, Stephanie, “Fiji's Communal Electoral System: A Study of Some Aspects of the Failure of Democratic Politics in Fiji,” Politics, 23:2 (11 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

89 See Hagan, , “Race, Politics, and the Coup in Fiji,” 718;Google Scholar and Fossen, van, “Two Military Coups in Fiji,” 2223.Google Scholar

90 Sydney Morning Herald, 11 February 1989, 79.Google Scholar

91 Twelve Member Committee of the Western Confederacy, “Submissions on the Draft Constitution,” 16 May 1989 (mimeo), see especially 5–13.Google Scholar

92 Ibid., 3–4.

93 New Zealand Herald, 13 March 1989, 10.Google Scholar

94 See Islands Business, February 1989, 20.Google Scholar

95 Transcript of interview with Rabuka, Radio New Zealand, 21 May 1989.