Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Simulated Driving and Brain Imaging: Combining Behavior, Brain Activity, and Virtual Reality

  • Kara N. Carvalho, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Robert S. Astur and Vince D. Calhoun

Abstract

Introduction:

Virtual reality in the form of simulated driving is a useful tool for studying the brain. Various clinical questions can be addressed, including both the role of alcohol as a modulator of brain function and regional brain activation related to elements of driving.

Objective:

We reviewed a study of the neural correlates of alcohol intoxication through the use of a simulated-driving paradigm and wished to demonstrate the utility of recording continuous-driving behavior through a new study using a programmable driving simulator developed at our center.

Methods:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging data was collected from subjects while operating a driving simulator. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to analyze the data. Specific brain regions modulated by alcohol, and relationships between behavior, brain function, and alcohol blood levels were examined with aggregate behavioral measures. Fifteen driving epochs taken from two subjects while also recording continuously recorded driving variables were analyzed with ICA.

Results:

Preliminary findings reveal that four independent components correlate with various aspects of behavior. An increase in braking while driving was found to increase activation in motor areas, while cerebellar areas showed signal increases during steering maintenance, yet signal decreases during steering changes. Additional components and significant findings are further outlined.

Conclusion:

In summary, continuous behavioral variables conjoined with ICA may offer new insight into the neural correlates of complex human behavior.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Please direct all correspondence to: Vince Calhoun, PhD,Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, 200 Retreat Ave., Hartford, CT 06106; Tel 860-545-7768; E-mail: vince.calhoun@yale.edu.

References

Hide All
1.US Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2002 Alcohol. Report No DOT HS 809 606.
2.Arnedt, JT, Wilde, GJ, Munt, PW, MacLean, AW. How do prolonged wakefulness and alcohol compare in the decrements they produce on a simulated driving task? Accid Anal Prev. 2001;33:337344.
3.Linnoila, M, Mattila, MJ. Interaction of alcohol and drugs on psychomotor skills as demonstrated by a driving simulator. Br J Pharmacol. 1973;47:671P672P.
4.Rimm, DC, Sininger, RA, Faherty, JD, Whitley, MD, Perl, MB. A balanced placebo investigation of the effects of alcohol vs. alcohol expectancy on simulated driving behavior. Addict Behav. 1982;7:2732.
5.Deery, HA, Fildes, BN. Young novice driver subtypes: relationship to high-risk behavior, traffic accident record, and simulator driving performance. Hum Factors. 1999;41:628643.
6.Verster, JC, Volkerts, ER, Verbaten, MN. Effects of alprazolam on driving ability, memory functioning and psychomotor performance: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;27:260269.
7.McGinty, VB, Shih, RA, Garrett, ES, Calhoun, VD, Pearlson, GD. Assessment of intoxicated driving with a simulator: a validation study with on road driving. In: Proceedings Human Centered Transportation Simulation Conference. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of Human Centered Transportation Simulation Conference. November 4-7, 2001; Iowa City, IA.
8.Worsley, KJ, Friston, KJ. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited–again. Neuroimage. 1995;2:173181.
9.McKeown, MJ, Makeig, S, Brown, GGet al.Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial component. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6:160188.
10.Biswal, BB, Ulmer, JL. Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23:265–71.
11.Calhoun, VD, Adali, T, Pearlson, GD, Pekar, JJ. Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001;13:4353.
12.Kapur, BM. Computer Blood Alcohol Calculator v1.20 ARF Software. Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation; 1989.
13.Calhoun, VD, Adali, T, McGinty, V, Pekar, JJ, Watson, T, Pearlson, GD. fMRI activation in a visual-perception task: network of areas detected using the general linear model and independent components analysis. Neuroimage. 2001;14:10801088.
14.Calhoun, VD, Altschul, D, McGinty, V, Shih, RA, Scott, D, Pearlson, GD. Alcohol intoxication effects on visual perception: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004;21:1526.
15.Calhoun, VD, Pekar, JJ, McGinty, VB, Adali, T, Watson, TD, Pearlson, GD. Different activation dynamics in multiple neural systems during simulated driving. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;16:158167.
16.Calhoun, VD, Pekar, JJ, Pearlson, GD. Alcohol intoxication effects on simulated driving: Exploring Alcohol-Dose Effects on Brain Activation Using Functional MRI. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:20972107.
17.Calhoun, VD, Adali, T, Pearlson, GD, Pekar, JJ. A Method for Making Group Inferences from Functional MRI Data Using Independent Component Analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 March 1;14(3):140–51.
18.Egolf, EA, Kiehl, KA, Calhoun, VD. Group ICA of fMRI Toolbox (GIFT) [computer program]. Available at http://icatb.sourceforge.net/; 2004.
19.Peterson, JB, Rothfleisch, J, Zelazo, PD, Pihl, RO. Acute alcohol intoxication and cognitive functioning. J Stud Alcohol. 1990;51:114122.
20.Volkow, ND, Mullani, N, Gould, L, et al.Effects of acute alcohol intoxication on cerebral blood flow measured with PET. Psychiatry Res. 1988;24:201209.
21.Mascord, D, Walls, J, Starmes, G. Fatigue and alcohol: interactive effects on human performance in driving-related tasks. In: Hartley, L, ed. Fatigues and Driving: Driver Impairment, Driver Fatigue, and Driving Simulation. London, UK: Taylor and Francis; 1995;189205.
22.Levin, JM, Ross, MH, Mendelson, JH, et al.Reduction in BOLD fMRI response to primary visual stimulation following alcohol ingestion. Psychiatry Res. 1998;82:135146.
23.Groeger, J.Understanding Driving: Applying Cognitive Psychology to a Complex Everyday Task. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2000.
24. Statistical Parametric Mapping [computer program]. Natick, Mass: The MathWorks, Inc.; 2002.
25.Freire, L, Roche, A, Mangin, JF. What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:470484.
26.Freire, L, Mangin, JF. Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion. Neuroimage. 2001;14:709722.
27.Friston, K, Ashburner, J, Frith, CD, Poline, JP, Heather, JD, Frackowiak, RS. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp. 1995;2:165189.

Simulated Driving and Brain Imaging: Combining Behavior, Brain Activity, and Virtual Reality

  • Kara N. Carvalho, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Robert S. Astur and Vince D. Calhoun

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed