Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Objective predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services—a systematic review

  • Ottilie Sedgwick (a1) (a2) (a3), Susan Young (a2) (a4), Mrigendra Das (a2) and Veena Kumari (a1) (a3)

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to examine whether neurobiological methods, or other methods independent of clinical judgment, have been investigated to assist decision making in forensic mental health services and, if so, whether this may be a useful strategy for predicting outcomes. OVID-Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo (inception–January 2015) were searched, limiting to English and human studies, using terms relating to “predict,” “outcome,” “psychiatry,” and “forensic” to identify primary research articles reporting on predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services not reliant on clinical judgment/self-report. Fifty studies investigating demographic, neuropsychological/neurophysiological, and biological predictors were identified, reporting on 3 broad outcomes: (i) inpatient violence, (ii) length of stay, (iii) reoffending. Factors associated positively, negatively, and showing no relationship with each outcome were extracted and compiled across studies. Of various demographic predictors examined, the most consistent associations were between previous psychiatric admissions and inpatient violence; a more “severe” offense and a longer length of stay; and young age and reoffending. Poor performance on tests of cognitive control and social cognition predicted inpatient violence while a neurophysiological measure of impulsivity showed utility predicting reoffending. Serum cholesterol and creatine kinase emerged as biological factors with potential to predict future inpatient violence. Research in this field is in its infancy, but investigations conducted to date indicate that using objective markers is a promising strategy to predict clinically significant outcomes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Objective predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services—a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Objective predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services—a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Objective predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services—a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Ottilie Sedgwick, Department of Psychology (PO78), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. (Email: ottilie.sedgwick@kcl.ac.uk)

Footnotes

Hide All

Ottilie Sedgwick receives funding support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and King’s College London. Veena Kumari is part funded by the Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London, and the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. The authors wish to thank Hannah Mullens for reading and providing constructive comments on an early draft of the manuscript.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Rutherford, M, Duggan, S. Forensic Mental Health Services: Facts and Figures on Current Provision. London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health; 2007.
2. Ross, T, Querengasser, J, Fontao, MI, Hoffmann, K. Predicting discharge in forensic psychiatry: the legal and psychosocial factors associated with long and short stays in forensic psychiatric hospitals. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012; 35(3): 213221.
3. Coid, J, Hickey, N, Kahtan, N, Zhang, T, Yang, M. Patients discharged from medium secure forensic psychiatry services: reconvictions and risk factors. Br J Psychiatry. 2007; 190(3): 223229.
4. Glorney, E, Perkins, D, Adshead, G, et al. Domains of need in a high secure hospital setting: a model for streamlining care and reducing length of stay. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2010; 9(2): 138148.
5. Gudjonsson, GH, Young, S. The role and scope of forensic clinical psychology in secure unit provisions: a proposed service model for psychological therapies. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2007; 18(4): 534556.
6. Webster, C, Douglas, K, Eaves, D, Hart, S. HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence Version 2 Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 1997.
7. O’Shea, LE, Mitchell, AE, Picchioni, MM, Dickens, GL. Moderators of the predictive efficacy of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management-20 for aggression in psychiatric facilities: systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2013; 18(2): 255270.
8. Hare, RD, Clark, D, Grann, M, Thornton, D. Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: an international perspective. Behav Sci Law. 2000; 18(5): 623645.
9. Walters, GD. Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the psychopathy checklist factor scores: a meta-analysis. Law Hum Behav. 2003; 27(5): 541558.
10. Hanson, RK, Morton-Bourgon, KE. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess. 2009; 21(1): 121.
11. Singh, JP, Fazel, S, Gueorguieva, R, Buchanan, A. Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments. Br J Psychiatry. 2014; 204(3): 180187.
12. Morrissey, C, Beeley, C, Milton, J. Longitudinal HCR-20 scores in a high-secure psychiatric hospital. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014; 24(3): 169180.
13. Barkataki, I, Kumari, V, Das, M, et al. A neuropsychological investigation into violence and mental illness. Schizophr Res. 2005; 74(1): 113.
14. Barkataki, I, Kumari, V, Das, M, Sumich, A, Taylor, P, Sharma, T. Neural correlates of deficient response inhibition in mentally disordered violent individuals. Behav Sci Law. 2008; 26(1): 5164.
15. Kumari, V, Aasen, I, Taylor, P, et al. Neural dysfunction and violence in schizophrenia: an fMRI investigation. Schizophr Res. 2006; 84(1): 144164.
16. Kumari, V, Das, M, Hodgins, S, et al. Association between violent behaviour and impaired prepulse inhibition of the startle response in antisocial personality disorder and schizophrenia. Behav Brain Res. 2005; 158(1): 159166.
17. Kumari, V, Das, M, Taylor, PJ, et al. Neural and behavioural responses to threat in men with a history of serious violence and schizophrenia or antisocial personality disorder. Schizophr Res. 2009; 110(1–3): 4758.
18. Letourneau, EJ, Armstrong, KS. Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse. 2008; 20(4): 393408.
19. Bastert, E, Schlafke, D, Pein, A, Kupke, F, Fegert, JM. Mentally challenged patients in a forensic hospital: a feasibility study concerning the executive functions of forensic patients with organic brain disorder, learning disability, or mental retardation. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012; 35(3): 207212.
20. Dolan, M, Doyle, M. Violence risk prediction: clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist. Br J Psychiatry. 2000; 177(4): 303311.
21. Harris, GT, Rice, ME. Risk appraisal and management of violent behavior. Psychiatr Serv. 1997; 48(9): 11681176.
22. McDermott, BE, Holoyda, BJ. Assessment of aggression in inpatient settings. CNS Spectr. 2014; 19(5): 425431.
23. Zapf, PA, Roesch, R. Future directions in the restoration of competency to stand trial. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011; 20(1): 4347.
24. Ball, EM, Young, D, Dotson, LA, Brothers, LT, Robbins, DT. Factors associated with dangerous behaviour in forensic inpatients: results from a pilot study. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994; 22(4): 605620.
25. Dietz, PE, Rada, RT. Battery incidents and batterers in a maximum security hospital. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982; 39(1): 3134.
26. Hillbrand, M. Aggression against self and aggression against others in violent psychiatric patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63(4): 668671.
27. Hoptman, MJ, Yates, KF, Patalinjug, MB, Wack, RC, Convit, A. Clinical prediction of assaultive behavior among male psychiatric patients at a maximum-security forensic facility. Psychiatr Serv. 1999; 50(11): 14611466.
28. Lussier, P, Verdun-Jones, S, Deslauriers-Varin, N, Nicholls, T, Brink, J. Chronic violent patients in an inpatient psychiatric hospital: prevalence, description, and identification. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2009; 37(1): 528.
29. Rasmussen, K, Levander, S. Individual rather than situational characteristics predict violence in a maximum security hospital. J Interpers Violence. 1996; 11(3): 376390.
30. Rogers, P, Watt, A, Gray, NS, MacCulloch, M, Gournay, K. Content of command hallucinations predicts self-harm but not violence in a medium secure unit. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 2002; 13(2): 251262.
31. Thomas, SD, Daffern, M, Martin, T, Ogloff, JR, Thomson, LD, Ferguson, M. Factors associated with seclusion in a statewide forensic psychiatric service in Australia over a 2-year period. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2009; 18(1): 29.
32. Foster, HG, Hillbrand, M, Silverstein, M. Neuropsychological deficit and aggressive behaviour: a prospective study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1993; 17(6): 939946.
33. Yudofsky, SC, Silver, JM, Jackson, W, Endicott, J, Williams, D. The overt aggression scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. Am J Psychiatry. 1986; 143(1): 3539.
34. Benton, AL, Varney, NR, Hamsher, KS. Visuospatial judgment: a clinical test. Arch Neurol. 1978; 35(6): 364367.
35. Stroop, JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935; 18(6): 643662.
36. Enticott, PG, Ogloff, JR, Bradshaw, JL, Daffern, M. Contrary to popular belief, a lack of behavioural inhibitory control may not be associated with aggression. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2007; 17(3): 179183.
37. Enticott, PG, Ogloff, JRP, Bradshaw, JL. Associations between laboratory measures of executive inhibitory control and self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences. 2006; 41(2): 285294.
38. Murphy, D. Theory of mind functioning in mentally disordered offenders detained in high security psychiatric care: its relationship to clinical outcome, need and risk. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2007; 17(5): 300311.
39. Wechsler, D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 1997.
40. Reitan, RM, Wolfson, D. Category test and trail making test as measures of frontal lobe functions. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 1995; 9(1): 5056.
41. Baron-Cohen, S, Wheelwright, S, Hill, J, Raste, Y, Plumb, I. The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised Version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001; 42(2): 241251.
42. Frith, CD, Corcoran, R. Exploring ‘theory of mind’ in people with schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 1996; 26(3): 521530.
43. Blair, RJ. A cognitive developmental approach to mortality: investigating the psychopath. Cognition. 1995; 57(1): 129.
44. Mathersul, D, McDonald, S, Rushby, JA. Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013; 35(6): 655668.
45. Roncone, R, Falloon, IRH, Mazza, M, et al. Is theory of mind in schizophrenia more strongly associated with clinical and social functioning than with neurocognitive deficits? Psychopathology. 2002; 35(5): 280288.
46. Hillbrand, M, Spitz, RT, Foster, HG. Serum cholesterol and aggression in hospitalized male forensic patients. J Behav Med. 1995; 18(1): 3343.
47. Hillbrand, M, Spitz, RT, Foster, HG, Krystal, JH, Young, JL. Creatine kinase elevations and aggressive behavior in hospitalized forensic patients. Psychiatr Q. 1998; 69(1): 6982.
48. Repo-Tiihonen, E, Paavola, P, Halonen, P, Tiihonen, J. Seclusion treatment measures and serum cholesterol levels among Finnish male forensic psychiatric patients. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 2002; 13(1): 157165.
49. Spitz, RT, Hillbrand, M, Foster, HG, Svetina, CJ. Ethnicity, aggression and serum creatine kinase in hospitalized male forensic patients. Ethn Dis. 1997; 7(3): 259270.
50. Wallimann, T, Wyss, M, Brdiczka, D, Nicolay, K, Eppenberger, HM. Intracellular compartmentation, structure and function of creatine kinase isoenzymes in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands: the ‘phosphocreatine circuit’ for cellular energy homeostas. Biochem J. 1992; 281(1): 2140.
51. Baldwin, LJ, Menditto, AA, Beck, NC, Smith, SM. Factors influencing length of hospitalization for NGRI acquittees in a maximum security facility. Journal of Psychiatry & Law. 1992; 20(2): 257267.
52. Edwards, J, Steed, P, Murray, K. Clinical and forensic outcome 2 years and 5 years after admission to a medium secure unit. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 2002; 13(1): 6887.
53. Long, CG, Dolley, O. Factors predictive of length of stay for women in medium secure settings. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012; 19(10): 870874.
54. Rice, ME, Quinsey, VL, Houghton, R. Predicting treatment outcome and recidivism among patients in a maximum security token economy. Behav Sci Law. 1990; 8(3): 313326.
55. Skipworth, J, Brinded, P, Chaplow, D, Frampton, C. Insanity acquittee outcomes in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006; 40(11–12): 10031009.
56. Steadman, HJ, Pasewark, RA, Hawkins, M, Kiser, M, Bieber, S. Hospitalization length of insanity acquittees. J Clin Psychol. 1983; 39(4): 611614.
57. Green, B, Baglioni, AJ. Length of stay, leave and reoffending by patients from a Queensland security patients hospital. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998; 32(6): 839847.
58. Andreasson, H, Nyman, M, Krona, H, et al. Predictors of length of stay in forensic psychiatry: the influence of perceived risk of violence. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014; 37(6): 635642.
59. Moran, MJ, Fragala, R, Wise, BF, Novak, TL. Factors affecting length of stay on maximum security in a forensic psychiatric hospital. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 1999; 43(3): 262274.
60. Brown, K, Fahy, T. Medium secure units: pathways of care and time to discharge over a four-year period in South London. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2009; 20(2): 268277.
61. Castro, M, Cockerton, T, Birke, S. From discharge to follow-up: a small scale study of medium secure provision in the independent sector. British Journal of Forensic Practice. 2002; 4(3): 3139.
62. Baxter, R, Rabe-Hesketh, S, Parrott, J. Characteristics, needs and reoffending in a group of patients with schizophrenia formerly treated in medium security. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 1999; 10(1): 6983.
63. Buchanan, A. Criminal conviction after discharge from special (high security) hospital: incidence in the first 10 years. Br J Psychiatry. 1998; 172(6): 472476.
64. Buchanan, A, Leese, M. Quantifying the contributions of three types of information to the prediction of criminal conviction using the receiver operating characteristic. Br J Psychiatry. 2006; 188(5): 472478.
65. Cohen, MI, Spodak, MK, Silver, SB, Williams, K. Predicting outcome of insanity acquittees released to the community. Behav Sci Law. 1988; 6(4): 515530.
66. Friendship, C, McClintock, T, Rutter, S, Maden, A. Re-offending: patients discharged from a regional secure unit. Crim Behav Ment Health. 1999; 9(3): 226236.
67. Maden, A, Rutter, S, McClintock, T, Friendship, C, Gunn, J. Outcome of admission to a medium secure psychiatric unit. I. Short- and long-term outcome. Br J Psychiatry. 1999; 175(4): 313316.
68. Philipse, MW, Koeter, MW, van der Staak, CP, van den Brink, W. Static and dynamic patient characteristics as predictors of criminal recidivism: a prospective study in a Dutch forensic psychiatric sample. Law Hum Behav. 2006; 30(3): 309327.
69. Phillips, HK, Gray, NS, MacCulloch, SI, et al. Risk assessment in offenders with mental disorders: relative efficacy of personal demographic, criminal history, and clinical variables. J Interpers Violence. 2005; 20(7): 833847.
70. Quinsey, VL, Rice, ME, Harris, GT. Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. J Interpers Violence. 1995; 10(1): 85105.
71. Rice, ME, Harris, GT. Predicting the recidivism of mentally disordered firesetters. J Interpers Violence. 1996; 11(3): 364375.
72. Rice, ME, Harris, GT, Lang, C, Bell, V. Recidivism among male insanity acquittees. Journal of Psychiatry & Law. 1990; 18(3–4): 379403.
73. Duncan, JM, Short, A, Lewis, JSG, Barrett, PT. Re-admissions to the State Hospital at Carstairs, 1992–1997. Health Bull (Edinb). 2002; 60(1): 7082.
74. Tennent, G, Way, C. The English Special Hospital—a 12-17 year follow-up study: a comparison of violent and non-violent re-offenders and non-offenders. Med Sci Law. 1984; 24(2): 8191.
75. Quinsey, VL, Maguire, A. Maximum security psychiatric patients: actuarial and clinical prediction of dangerousness. J Interpers Violence. 1986; 1(2): 143171.
76. Zonana, HV, Bartel, RL, Wells, JA, Buchanan, JA, Getz, MA. Part II: sex differences in personal found not guilty by reason of insanity: analysis of data from the Connecticut NGRI Registry. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1990; 18(2): 129151.
77. Rice, ME, Harris, GT, Quinsey, VL. A follow-up of rapists assessed in a maximum-security psychiatric facility. J Interpers Violence. 1990; 5(4): 435448.
78. Maden, A, Friendship, C, McClintock, T, Rutter, S. Outcome of admission to a medium secure psychiatric unit. 2. Role of ethnic origin. Br J Psychiatry. 1999; 175(4): 317321.
79. Reiss, D, Grubin, D, Meux, C. Young ‘psychopaths’ in special hospital: treatment and outcome. Br J Psychiatry. 1996; 168(1): 99104.
80. Howard, R, McCarthy, L, Huband, N, Duggan, C. Re-offending in forensic patients released from secure care: the role of antisocial/borderline personality disorder co-morbidity, substance dependence and severe childhood conduct disorder. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2013; 23(3): 191202.
81. Bailey, J, Macculloch, M. Patterns of reconviction in patients discharged directly to the community from a special hospital: implications for aftercare. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 1992; 3(3): 445461.
82. Quinn, P, Ward, M. What happens to special hospital patients admitted to medium security? Med Sci Law. 2000; 40(4): 345349.
83. Howard, R, Lumsden, J. A neurophysiological predictor of reoffending in special hospital patients. Crim Behav Ment Health. 1996; 6(2): 147156.
84. Howard, RC, Fenton, GW, Fenwick, PBC. The contingent negative variation, personality and antisocial behaviour. Br J Psychiatry. 1984; 144(5): 463474.
85. Howard, RC. Brain waves, dangerousness and deviant desires. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 2002; 13(2): 367384.
86. Harris, ST, Oakley, C, Picchioni, M. Quantifying violence in mental health research. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2013; 18(6): 695701.
87. Bechara, A, Damasio, AR, Damasio, H, Anderson, SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 1994; 50(1): 715.
88. Bass, SLS, Nussbaum, D. Decision making and aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2010; 37(4): 365383.
89. Fullam, R, Dolan, MC. Executive function and in-patient violence in forensic patients with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2008; 193(3): 247253.
90. Nelson, HE, Willison, JR. The revised national adult reading test - Test manual. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
91. Wechsler, D. The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. New York: The Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace & Company; 1999.
92. Rubia, K, Russell, T, Overmeyer, S, et al. Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. Neuroimage. 2001; 13(2): 250261.
93. Fray, PJ, Robbins, TW. CANTAB battery: proposed utility in neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1996; 18(4): 499504.
94. Golomb, BA, Stattin, H, Mednick, S. Low cholesterol and violent crime. J Psychiatr Res. 2000; 34(4–5): 301309.
95. Kaplan, JR. Assessing the observed relationship between low cholesterol and violence-related mortality: implications for suicide risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997; 836: 5780.
96. Roaldset, JO, Bakken, AM, Bjørkly, S. A prospective study of lipids and serotonin as risk markers of violence and self-harm in acute psychiatric patients. Psychiat Res. 2011; 186(2–3): 293299.
97. Virkkunen, M, Rissanen, A, Franssila-Kallunki, A, Tiihonen, J. Low non-oxidative glucose metabolism and violent offending: an 8-year prospective follow-up study. Psychiatr Res. 2009; 168(1): 2631.
98. Stalenheim, EG. Long-term validity of biological markers of psychopathy and criminal recidivism: follow-up 6-8 years after forensic psychiatric investigation. Psychiatr Res. 2004; 121(3): 281291.
99. Singh, I, Rose, N. Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature. 2009; 460(7252): 202207.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Sedgwick supplementary material S1
Supplementary Table

 Unknown (238 KB)
238 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Sedgwick supplementary material S2
Supplementary Table

 Word (55 KB)
55 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed