Skip to main content Accessibility help

Criminogenic risk and mental health: a complicated relationship

  • Robert D. Morgan (a1), Faith Scanlon (a1) and Stephanie A. Van Horn (a1)


The relationship between criminogenic risk and mental illness in justice involved persons with mental illness is complex and poorly understood by clinicians, researchers, administrators, and policy makers alike. Historically, when providing services to justice involved persons with mental illness, clinicians have emphasized mental health recovery (eg, psychiatric rehabilitation) at the exclusion of treatments targeted at criminogenic risk. More recently, however, researchers have demonstrated with great clarity that criminogenic risk not only contributes but is likely the leading factor in the criminal behavior committed by persons with mental illness. Yet, we still do not know the nature of this criminogenic-mental illness relationship, how this relationship impacts treatment needs, and of ultimate concern, what this relationship means in terms of individual and societal outcomes. In this paper we briefly define criminogenic risk and the research that demonstrates the role of criminogenic risk in criminal justice involvement of persons with mental illness. We also review prevalence rates of persons with mental illness justice involvement, and then discuss important factors to be considered when assessing risk to include both criminogenic and mental illness risk. We conclude this paper by reviewing treatment and management strategies for persons with mental illness that are criminal justice involved particularly reviewing and building off the recommendations put forth by Bartholomew & Morgan.


Corresponding author

*Address correspondence to: Robert Morgan, PhD, Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, PO Box 42051, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA. (Email:


Hide All
1. Bartholomew, NR, Morgan, RD. Comorbid mental illness and criminalness implications for housing and treatment. CNS Spec. 2015;20(3):231240. doi:10.1017/s1092852915000231.
2. Bonta, J, Andrews, DA. Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation. 2007;6(1):122.
3. Bewley, MT, Morgan, RD. A national survey of mental health services available to offenders with mental illness: who is doing what? Law Hum Behav. 2011;35(5):351363. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9242-4.
4. Morgan, RD, Flora, DB, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Varghese, F, Steffan, JS. Treating offenders with mental illness: A research synthesis. Law Hum Behav. 2012;36(1):3750.
5. Bonta, J, Andrews, DA. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016.
6. Ditton, PM. Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1999.
7. Draine, J, Salzer, MS, Culhane, DP, Hadley, TR. Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53(5):565573.
8. Fisher, WH, Silver, E, Wolff, N. Beyond criminalization: toward a criminologically informed framework for mental health policy and services research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006;33(5):544557.
9. Skeem, JL, Winter, E, Kennealy, PJ, Louden, JE, Tatar, II, Joseph, R. Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: Toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 2014;38(3):212.
10. Bonta, J, Law, M, Hanson, K. The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1998;123(2):123.
11. Morgan, RD, Fisher, WH, Duan, N, Mandracchia, JT, Murray, D. Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law Hum Behav. 2010;34(4):324336.
12. Wolff, N, Morgan, RD, Shi, J. Comparative analysis of attitudes and emotions among inmates: does mental illness matter? Crim Justice Behav. 2013;40(10):10921108.
13. Wolff, N, Morgan, RD, Shi, J, Fisher, W, Huening, J. Comparative analysis of thinking styles and emotional states of male and female inmates with and without mental disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:14851493.
14. Wilson, AB, Farkas, K, Ishler, K, et al. Criminal thinking styles among people with serious mental illness in jail. Law Hum Behav. 2014;38(6):592601.
15. Bolaños, AD, Mitchell, SM, Morgan, RD, et al. A comparison of criminogenic risk factors between psychiatric inpatients with and without criminal justice involvement. (in preparation)
16. Gross, NR, Morgan, RD. Understanding persons with mental illness who are and are not criminal justice involved: a comparison of criminal thinking and psychiatric symptoms. Law Hum Behav. 2013;37(3):175186.
17. Skeem, JL, Manchak, S, Peterson, JK. Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness. Law Hum Behav. 2011;35(2):110126.
18. Hodgins, S, Müller-Isberner, R, Freese, R, et al. A comparison of general adult and forensic patients with schizophrenia living in the community. Int J Forensic Men Health. 2007;6(1):6375.
19. Scanlon, F, Morgan, RD, Mitchell, SM, et al. Community mental health settings and the criminal justice systems: The institutions of justice-involved persons with mental illness. (in preparation)
20. Theriot, MT, Dulmus, CN, Sowers, KM, et al. Factors relating to self-identification among bullying victims. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2005;27(9):979994.
21. Walters, GD. The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles: Part II: Identifying simulated response sets. Crim Justice Behav. 1995;22(4):437445.
22. Millon, T, Millon, C, Davis, RD, et al. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III): Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson/PsychCorp; 2009.
23. Shields, IW, Simourd, DJ. Predicting predatory behavior in a population of incarcerated young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1991;18(2):180194.
24. Van Horn, SA, Morgan, RD, Grabowski, KE. Examining the relationship between criminalness, mental illness and institutional misconduct. (in preparation)
25. Dawes, RM, Faust, D, Meehl, PE. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989;243:16681674.
26. Monahan, J. Predicting Violent Behavior: An Assessment of Clinical Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1981.
27. Andrews, DA, Bonta, J, Wormith, JS. The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime Delinquency. 2006;52(1):727.
28. Mills, JF. Violence risk assessment: A brief review, current issues, and future directions. Can Psychol. 2017;58(1):4049.
29. Mills, JF, Kroner, DG. The effect of base-rate information on the perception of risk for re-offence. Am J Forensic Psychol. 2006;24:4556.
30. Walters, GD, Kroner, DG, DeMatteo, D, Locklair, BR. The impact of base rate utilization and clinical experience on the accuracy of judgments made with the HCR-20. J Forensic Psychol Prac. 2014;14(4):288301.
31. Hilton, NZ, Harris, GT, Rawson, K, Beach, CA. Communicating violence risk information to forensic decision makers. Crim Justice Behav. 2005;32(1):97116.
32. Wormith, JS. The legacy of DA Andrews in the field of criminal justice: How theory and research can change policy and practice. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2011;10(2):7882.
33. Andrews, DA, Bonta, J, Wormith, JS. The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems; 2004.
34. Ferguson, AM, Ogloff, JR, Thomson, L. Predicting recidivism by mentally disordered offenders using the LSI-R: SV. Crim Justice Behav. 2009;36(1):520.
35. Kelly, CE, Welsh, WN. The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory—Revised for drug-involved offenders. Crim Justice Behav. 2008;35(7):819831.
36. Campbell, MA, French, S, Gendreau, P. The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Crim Justice Behav. 2009;36(6):567590.
37. Gray, NS, Hill, C, McGleish, A, Timmons, D, MacCulloch, MJ, Snowden, RJ. Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: a prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R, and psychiatric symptomatology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(3):443.
38. Andrews, DA, Dowden, C. Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: a meta-analytic investigation. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006;50(1):88100.
39. Lowenkamp, CT, Latessa, EJ, Holsinger, AM. The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime Delinquency. 2006;52(1):7793.
40. Wong, SC, Gordon, A. The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2006;12(3):279.
41. Prochaska, JO, DiClemente, CC. The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin; 1984.
42. Morgan, RD, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Olafsson, BN. The Services Matching Instrument. Unpublished assessment.
43. Olafsson, BN, Morgan, RD, Kroner, DG. The services matching instrument: development, reliability and preliminary validity. (in preparation)
44. Morgan, RD, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Batastini, AB. Treating criminal offenders . In Weiner, IB, Otto, RK, eds. Handbook of Forensic Psychology. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2013:795838.
45. Little, GL, Robinson, KD. Moral reconation therapy: a systematic step-by-step treatment system for treatment resistant clients. Psychol Rep. 1988;62:135151.
46. Rotter, M, Carr, WA. Targeting criminal recidivism in mentally ill offenders: structured clinical approaches. Community Ment Health J. 2011;47(6):723726.
47. Goodell, S, Druss, BG, Walker, ER, Mat, M. Mental Disorders and Medical Comorbidity. Cambridge, MA: The Synthesis Project, MIT; 2011.
48. Holzer, HJ, Raphael, S, Stoll, MA. How willing are employers to hire ex-offenders. Focus. 2004;23(2):4043.
49. Petersilia, J. Prisoner reentry: public safety and reintegration challenges. Prison J. 2001;81(3):360375.
50. Varghese, FP, Hardin, EE, Bauer, RL, Morgan, RD. Attitudes toward hiring offenders: the roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2009;54(5):769782.
51. Corrigan, P. How stigma interferes with mental health care. Am Psychol. 2004;59(7):614.
52. Alexander, L, Link, B. The impact of contact on stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. J Ment Health. 2003;12(3):271289.
53. Overton, SL, Medina, SL. The stigma of mental illness. J Counsel Develop. 2008;86(2):143151.
54. Batastini, AB, Bolanos, AD, Morgan, RD. Attitudes toward hiring applicants with mental illness and criminal justice involvement: the impact of education and experience. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014;37(5):524533.
55. Graffam, J, Shinkfield, AJ, Hardcastle, L. The perceived employability of ex-prisoners and offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2008;52(6):673685.
56. Allen, LB, McHugh, RK, Barlow, DH. Emotional disorders: a unified protocol. In Barlow, DH, ed. Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders: A Step-by-Step Treatment Manual . New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008:216249.
57. Aaronson, CJ, Katzman, GP, Gorman, JM. Combination pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for the treatment of major depression and anxiety disorders. In: Nathan, PE, Gorman, JM (Eds.), A Guide to Treatments that Work. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007
58. Morgan, RD, Kroner, D, Mills, JF. A Treatment Manual for Justice Involved Persons with Mental Illness: Changing Lives and Changing Outcomes. New York, NY: Routledge; 2018.
59. Colwell, LH, Gianesini, J. Demographic, criminogenic, and psychiatric factors that predict competency restoration. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011; 39(3): 297306.
60. Gowensmith, WN, Frost, LE, Speelman, DW, Therson, DW. Lookin’ for beds in all the wrong places: Outpatient competency restoration as a promising approach to modern challenges. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2016;22(3):293305.
61. Gingerich, S, Mueser, KT. Illness Management and Recovery Implementation Resource Kit . Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services; 2004.


Criminogenic risk and mental health: a complicated relationship

  • Robert D. Morgan (a1), Faith Scanlon (a1) and Stephanie A. Van Horn (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed