Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-7l5rh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-21T22:30:06.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Telephone-delivered Interpersonal Psychotherapy: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2021

Mario Miniati*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Francesca Marzetti
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology, Critical and Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Laura Palagini
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Ciro Conversano
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology, Critical and Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Beatrice Buccianelli
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Donatella Marazziti
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Angelo Gemignani
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology, Critical and Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
*
*Author for correspondence: Mario Miniati, MD, PhD Email: mario.miniati@med.unipi.it

Abstract

Background

The aim of this paper is to review evidence on Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) administered via telephone (IPT-T).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of studies published between January 1, 1990 and June 30, 2020, assessing the efficacy of IPT administered by phone, using PubMed.

Results

Originally, we found 60 papers; the final selection led to 13 papers. Six studies were performed using a randomized clinical trial methodology (6/13, 46.2%), three were prospective open-label not randomized studies (3/13, 15.7%), three were pilot studies (3/13, 23.1%), and one was a feasibility/acceptance study (1/13, 7.7%). The number of subjects included in the studies ranged between 14 and 442 (mean: 140.0 ± 124.9), for a total of 1850 patients. The mean age of the enrolled subjects was 47.8 ± 9.3 years (range: 27.4-70.4). Thirty-four different instruments were utilized. Qualitative synthesis was conducted only on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), namely on six studies. RCTs were almost all of good quality (mean score/standard deviation of the RCT-Psychotherapy Quality Rating Scale omnibus rating: 5.6 ± 1.2 points; range: 3-7).

Conclusions

IPT-T showed response rates similar to IPT administered in the usual way. Results are limited by small samples sizes, selection bias of the less severe depressed patients, and the heterogeneity of rating scales.

Type
Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rosenkotter, L. The interpersonal theory of psychiatry; Harry Stack Sullivan’s hypotheses. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr Grenzgeb. 1958;26(8):430440.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1. New York: Basic Books; 1969.Google Scholar
Miniati, M, Callari, A, Calugi, S, et al. Interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: a systematic review. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17(4):257268. doi:10.1007/s00737-014-0442-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miniati, M, Callari, A, Maglio, A, et al. Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:353369. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S120584CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markowitz, JC, Weissman, MM. Interpersonal psychotherapy: principles and applications. World Psychiatry. 2004;3(3):136139.Google ScholarPubMed
Stuart, S, Robertson, M. Interpersonal Psychotherapy: A Clinician’s Guide (2nd ed.). CRC Press; 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b13443.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P, Donker, T, Weissman, MM, et al. Interpersonal psychotherapy for mental health problems: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(7):680687. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15091141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohr, DC, Ho, J, Duffecy, J, et al. Perceived barriers to psychological treatments and their relationship to depression. J Clin Psychol. 2010;66(4):394409. doi:10.1002/jclp.20659Google ScholarPubMed
Steinmann, M, Heddaeus, D, Liebherz, S, et al. Effectiveness of telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for depression with versus without additional letters: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(3):347353. doi:10.1089/tmj.2018.0311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinkerton, RS, Rockwell, WJK. The telephone follow-up: achieving closure in psychological interventions with students who “no show.” J College Stud Psychother. 1996;10:8991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katon, W, Rutter, C, Ludman, EJ, et al. A randomized trial of relapse prevention of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(3):241247. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.3.241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, L, Weissman, M. Interpersonal psychotherapy delivered over the telephone to recurrent depressives. A pilot study. Depress Anxiety. 2002;16(3):114117. doi:10.1002/da.10047CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schardt, C, Adams, MB, Owens, T, et al. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:16. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocsis, JH, Gerber, AJ, Milrod, B, et al. A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy. Compr Psychiatry. 2010;51(3):319324. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.07.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, T, McClintock, AS, McCarrick, SS, et al. Working alliance, interpersonal problems, and depressive symptoms in tele-interpersonal psychotherapy for HIV-infected rural persons: evidence for indirect effects. J Clin Psychol. 2018;74(3):286303. doi:10.1002/jclp.22502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heckman, TG, Markowitz, JC, Heckman, BD, et al. A randomized clinical trial showing persisting reductions in depressive symptoms in HIV-infected rural adults following brief telephone-administered interpersonal psychotherapy. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(4):299308. doi:10.1093/abm/kax015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heckman, TG, Heckman, BD, Anderson, T, et al. Tele-interpersonal psychotherapy acutely reduces depressive symptoms in depressed HIV-infected rural persons: a randomized clinical trial. Behav Med. 2017;43(4):285295. doi:10.1080/08964289.2016.1160025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corruble, E, Swartz, HA, Bottai, T, et al. Telephone-administered psychotherapy in combination with antidepressant medication for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:611. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grote, NK, Katon, WJ, Russo, JE, et al. Collaborative care for perinatal depression in socioeconomically disadvantaged women: a randomized trial. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32(11):821834. doi:10.1002/da.22405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lespérance, F, Frasure-Smith, N, Koszycki, D, et al. Effects of citalopram and interpersonal psychotherapy on depression in patients with coronary artery disease: the Canadian Cardiac Randomized Evaluation of Antidepressant and Psychotherapy Efficacy (CREATE) trial. JAMA. 2007;297(4):367379. doi:10.1001/jama.297.4.367CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, C-L, Grigoriadis, S, Zupancic, J, et al. Telephone-based nurse-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: nationwide randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;216(4):189196. doi:10.1192/bjp.2019.275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guille, C, Douglas, E. Telephone delivery of interpersonal psychotherapy by certified nurse-midwives may help reduce symptoms of postpartum depression. Evid Based Nurs. 2017;20(1):1213. doi:10.1136/eb-2016-102513CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posmontier, B, Neugebauer, R, Stuart, S, et al. Telephone-administered interpersonal psychotherapy by nurse-midwives for postpartum depression. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61(4):456466. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ransom, D, Heckman, TG, Anderson, T, et al. Telephone-delivered, interpersonal psychotherapy for HIV-infected rural persons with depression: a pilot trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(8):871877. doi:10.1176/ps.2008.59.8.871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnelly, JM, Kornblith, AB, Fleishman, S, et al. A pilot study of interpersonal psychotherapy by telephone with cancer patients and their partners. Psychooncology. 2000;9(1):4456.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MD, Stack, J, Reynolds, CF. A two-tiered strategy for preventing complications of bereavement in the first thirteen months post-loss: a pilot study using peer supports with professional therapist back-up. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;26(3):350357. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2017.05.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 . 5th ed., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.Google Scholar
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV . Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-III-R . 3rd ed. rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967;6(4):278296. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endicott, J, Spitzer, RL, Fleiss, JL, et al. The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33(6):766771. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissman, MM, Bothwell, S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33(9):11111115. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, E. Treating Bipolar Disorder: A Clinician’s Guide to Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J, Epstein, P, Fiester, SJ, et al. Clinical management—imipramine/placebo administration manual. NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1987;23(2):309324.Google ScholarPubMed
Elkin, I, Shea, MT, Watkins, JT, et al. National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. General effectiveness of treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46(11):971982; discussion 983. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110013002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, E, Kupfer, DJ, Perel, JM, et al. Three-year outcomes for maintenance therapies in recurrent depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47(12):10931099. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810240013002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, AJ, Trivedi, MH, Ibrahim, HM, et al. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54(5):573583. doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehlers, CL, Frank, E, Kupfer, DJ. Social zeitgebers and biological rhythms. A unified approach to understanding the etiology of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(10):948952. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800340076012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-Revised. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs; 1976: 218222.Google Scholar
Cox, JL, Holden, JM, Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782786. doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22–33;quiz 3457.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, RC. Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale. Psychosomatics. 1995;36(3):267275. doi:10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71666-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spanier, GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976;38(1):1528. doi:10.2307/350547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A, Atkins, R, Kumar, R, et al. A new Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale: links with early maternal mood. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8(1):4551. doi:10.1007/s00737-005-0074-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarason, IG, Levine, HM, Basham, RB, et al. Assessing social support: the Social Support Questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):127139. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attkisson, CC, Zwick, R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233237. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606613. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, J. Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. 1996.Google Scholar
Spielberger, CD, Gorsuch, RL, Lushene, RE. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Published online 1970. Accessed May 25, 2020. http://ubir.buffalo.edu/xmlui/handle/10477/2895Google Scholar
Fraley, RC, Heffernan, ME, Vicary, AM, et al. The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychol Assess. 2011;23(3):615625. doi:10.1037/a0022898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prigerson, HG, Maciejewski, PK, Reynolds, CF, et al. Inventory of Complicated Grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Res. 1995;59(1–2):6579. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bec, AT, Steer, RA, Brown, GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.Google Scholar
Lambert, MJ, Lunnen, K, Umphres, V, et al. Administration and Scoring Manual of the Outcomes Questionnaire (OQ-45.1). Salt Lake City, UT: IHC Center for Behavioral Healthcare Efficacy; 1994.Google Scholar
Turner, RJ, Frankel, BG, Levin, D Social support: conceptualization, measurement, and implications for mental health. Res Community Ment Health. 1983;3,67111.Google Scholar
Russell, D, Peplau, LA, Cutrona, CE. The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol;1980; 39:472480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB, Kroenke, K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1994;272(22):17491756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teng, EL, Chui, HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48(8):314318.Google ScholarPubMed
Alden, LE, Wiggins, JS, Pincus, AL. Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. J Pers Assess. 1990;55(3–4):521536. doi:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674088CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed