Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:26:16.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Size and Shape of Allophane Particles in Dispersed Aqueous Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Jutaro Karube
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, Ami-machi, Ibaraki-ken, 300-03 Japan
Katsuya Nakaishi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, Ami-machi, Ibaraki-ken, 300-03 Japan
Hideo Sugimoto
Affiliation:
Technical Research Institute of Obayashi Corp., 4-640 Shimokiyoto, Kiyose-shi, Tokyo, 204 Japan
Masami Fujihira
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Mitsui Harbour and Urban Construction Inc., 1-1 Saiwai-cho, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi, 261 Japan

Abstract

Aqueous suspensions of allophane show relatively high viscosity, presumably because of strong particle interaction between the unit particles. To test this hypothesis, we measured the particle weight and particle size of allophane during a dispersion using the light scattering method. The particle weight was more than several hundred times larger than that of the unit particle, and the size was 100–400 nm, whereas the Stokes’ diameter of the particles in the sample was less than 50 nm. Particle weight and size varied with the pH of the sample. Particle sizes were cross-checked by ultrafiltration through membrane filters. The experimental findings show that the unit particles of allophane within dilute dispersions appear to be associated like strings of beads, forming domains (primary floccules) about 100 nm in diameter. When these domains coagulate under certain conditions, they do not grow analogously but form clusters, such as secondary floccules, then precipitate. Formation of secondary flocculation of loose structure accounts for the maximum relative viscosity at the transition pH between dispersion and coagulation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Egashira, K.. 1977. Viscosities of allophane and imogolite clay suspensions. Clay Sci 5: 8795.Google Scholar
Elford, W.J.. 1931. A new series of graded collodion membranes suitable for general bacteriological use, especially in filterable virus studies. J Pathol Bacterial 34: 505521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P.L., Churchman, G.J. and Theng, B.K.G.. 1985. Size distribution of allophane unit particles in aqueous suspensions. Clays & Clay Miner 33: 345349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, W., Nakagaki, M. and Wallach, M.L.. 1959. Theoretical investigations on the light scattering of colloidal spheres. J Chem Phys 30: 444450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiemenz, P.C.. 1986. Principles of colloid and surface chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. p 207213.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L.. 1956. Soil chemical analysis—Advanced course. Madison, WI: Published by the author. p 7176.Google Scholar
Jirgensons, B. and Straumanis, M.E.. 1962. A short textbook of colloid chemistry. Chemistry. Pergamon Press. Japanese language edition (1967). Tokyo: Baifukan. p 2124.Google Scholar
Karube, J.. 1982a. Microstructure of allophane in disperse system by light scattering method. Trans Jap Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 98: 714 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Karube, J.. 1982b. Domain size measurement of dispersed allophane with a membrane filter and a discussion on the allophane disperse system. Trans Jap Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 99: 1723 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Karube, J., Nakaishi, K., Sugimoto, H. and Fujihira, M.. 1992. Electrophoretic behavior of imogolite under alkaline conditions. Clays & Clay Miner 40: 625628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Y.. 1971. The “unit particle” of allophane. Am Mineral 56: 465475.Google Scholar
Maeda, T., Takenaka, H. and Warkentin, B.P.. 1977. Physical properties of allophane soils. Adv in Agron 29: 229264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, J.W., Oncley, J.L. and Simha, R.. 1940. Viscosity and the shape of protein molecules. Science 92: 132133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehra, O.P. and Jackson, M.L.. 1960. Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. In: Swineford, A., editor. Proc 7th Natl Conf Washington, DC, 1958, New York: Pergamon Press. Clays & Clay Miner p 317327.Google Scholar
Nitawaki, Y., Wada, K. and Egashira, K.. 1981. Particle-particle and particle-water interactions in aqueous clay suspensions. Part II. Viscosity data and interpretation. Clay Sci 5: 319331.Google Scholar
Tanford, C.. 1961. Physical chemistry of macromolecules. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. p 275316.Google Scholar
Wada, K.. 1989. Allophane and imogolite. In: Dixon, J.B., Weed, S.B., editors. Minerals in Soil Environments. Madison, WI: Soil Sci Soc Am p 10511087.Google Scholar
Wada, K. and Greenland, D.J.. 1970. Selective dissolution and differential infrared spectroscopy for characterization of “amorphous” constituents in soil clays. Clay Miner 8: 241254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K., Nitawaki, Y. and Egashira, K.. 1981. Particle-particle and particle-water interactions in aqueous clay suspensions. Part I. Application of a modified Robinson equation to viscosity data. Clay Sci 5: 313318.Google Scholar
Wada, S. and Wada, K.. 1977. Density and structure of allophane. Clay Miner 12: 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, N. and Theng, B.K.G.. 1985. Factors affecting the flow behavior of soil allophane suspensions under low shear rates. J Coll Interface Sci 104: 398408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar