Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T09:19:59.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the Size of Aggregates on Pore Characteristics of Minerals Measured by Mercury Intrusion and Water-Vapor Desorption Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Grzegorz Jozefaciuk
Grzegorz Jozefaciuk*
Affiliation:
Institute of Agrophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Doswiadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland
*
* E-mail address of corresponding author: jozefaci@ipan.lublin.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The size, shape, and continuity of pores in mineral solids greatly influence the behavior of percolating liquids and solids in porous media, which has significant practical environmental implications. In order to expand understanding of these properties in soil minerals, the present study was undertaken to analyze the pore characteristics of bentonite, illite, and kaolinite in the forms of powder and aggregates of different dimensions, combining water-vapor desorption and mercury-intrusion techniques. Different granulometric fractions of milled quartz glass were also studied. With increasing aggregate size of the minerals, larger pore volumes (up to 25%), smaller surface areas (down to 15%), larger average radii (up to 15%), and smaller fractal dimensions (down to 6%) were measured using water-vapor adsorption-desorption data. The differences were smallest for bentonite, possibly due to the smallest particle size of this mineral and/or to its very large water-vapor adsorption capacity. The degree of water-vapor adsorption on quartz was too small to rely on the data obtained.

The pore volumes and average radii, measured by mercury-intrusion porosimetry, were up to few times larger for the mineral powders than for their aggregate counterparts. Similar values were noted for aggregates >1 mm in diameter, for which the input of interaggregate spaces into total porosity of the sample bed was negligible. Two pathways of mercury intrusion were detected in porosimetric curves: filling of interaggregate spaces, and penetration into aggregates. Similar penetration thresholds into aggregates of different sizes were calculated. With increasing size of quartz grains, the pore volume of the quartz bed decreased whereas the average pore radius increased. Mercury intrusion detected pore-fractal behavior of bentonite and kaolinite, but for aggregated minerals the calculated values of fractal dimensions were >3, values which increased with increasing aggregate size. Very similar pore parameters were measured for aggregates prepared from a natural deposit of kaolinite and for artificially prepared aggregates from powder of the same mineral, indicating that artificial aggregation can simulate natural processes.

Both water desorption and mercury intrusion detected fractal behavior in the limited range of pores. A test to find fractal build up of the aggregates in extended scales based on a dependence of surface area of unit volume of aggregate bed on aggregate size showed no fractal-aggregate build-up.

Keywords

AggregateAdsorption IsothermsMercury IntrusionMineralPorosity
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 57 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 586 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, A.B. Willis, K.L. and Lange, D.A., 1999 Mercury intrusion porosimetry and image analysis of cement-based materials Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 211 39–44 10.1006/jcis.1998.5986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alie, C. Pirard, R. and Pirard, J.P., 2001 Mercury porosimetry applied to porous silica materials: successive buckling and intrusion mechanisms Colloids and Surfaces, A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 187–188 375–383.Google Scholar
Avnir, D. Farin, D. and Pfeifer, P., 1985 Surface geometric irregularity of particulate materials. The fractal approach Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 103 112–123 10.1016/0021-9797(85)90082-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balci, S., 1999 Effect of heating and acid pre-treatment on pore size distribution of sepiolite Clay Minerals 34 647–653 10.1180/000985599546406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barral, M.T. Arias, M. and Guerif, J., 1998 Effects of iron and organic matter on the porosity and structural stability of soil aggregates Soil and Tillage Research 46 261–272 10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00092-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartoli, F. Bird, N.R.A. Gomendy, V. Vivier, H. and Niquet, S., 1999 The relation between silty soil structures and their mercury porosimetry curve counterparts: fractals and percolation European Journal of Soil Science 50 9–22 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00209.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, D. and Keller, W.D., 1975 Bulk densities of selected dried natural and fired kaolin clays Clays and Clay Minerals 23 424–427 10.1346/CCMN.1975.0230602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, N. and Alexander, M., 1999 Relationship between nanoporosity and other properties of soil Soil Science 164 726–730 10.1097/00010694-199910000-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, L. Celis, R. Hermosin, M.C. Becker, A. and Cornejo, J., 1997 Porosity and herbicide leaching in soils amended with olive-mill wastewater Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 65 151–161 10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00063-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J.W. and Matsui, N., 1996 Heterogeneity of the pore and solid volume of soil: distinguishing a fractal space from its non-fractal complement Geoderma 73 183–195 10.1016/0016-7061(96)00045-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dullien, F.A.L. and Dhawan, G.K., 1975 Bivariate pore size distributions of some sandstones Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 52 129–135 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90309-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsharief, A.M. and Lovell, C.W., 1996 A probabilistic retention criterion for nonwoven geotextiles Geotextiles and Geomembranes 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fies, J.C., 1992 Analysis of textural porosity relative to skeleton particle size, using mercury porosimetry Soil Science Society of America Journal 56 1062–1067 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600040009x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluba, T. Obraniak, A. and Gawot-Mlynarczyk, E., 2004 The effect of granulation conditions on bulk density of a product Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing 38 177–186.Google Scholar
Gnanapragasam, N. Lewis, B.A.G. and Fino, R., 1995 Microstructural changes in sand-bentonite soils when exposedtoaniline Journal of Geotechnical Engineering — ASCE 121 119–125 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:2(119).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomendy, V. Bartoli, F. Burtin, G. Doirisse, M. Philippy, R. Niquet, S. and Vivier, H., 1999 Silty topsoil structure and its dynamics: the fractal approach Geoderma 88 165–189 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00103-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorres, J.H. Savin, M.C. and Amador, J.A., 2001 Soil micropore structure and carbon mineralization in burrows and casts of an anecic earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33 1881–1887 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00068-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groena, J.C. Peffer, L.A.A. and Pérez-Ramírez, J., 2002 Incorporation of appropriate contact angles in textural characterization by mercury porosimetry Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 144 91–98 10.1016/S0167-2991(02)80224-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnos, M., 1998 Influence of humic acid on the structural properties of kaolin — mercury porosimetry studies International Agrophysics 12 185–192.Google Scholar
Hajnos, M. Sokolowska, Z. Jozefaciuk, G. Hoffmann, C. and Renger, M., 1999 Effect of leaching DOC on pore characteristics of a sandy soil Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 162 19–25 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2624(199901)162:1<19::AID-JPLN19>3.0.CO;2-1.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnos, M. Jozefaciuk, G. Sokolowska, Z. Greiffenhagen, A. and Wessolek, G., 2003 Water storage, surface, and structural properties of sandy forest humus horizons Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 166 625–634 10.1002/jpln.200321161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, A. Obraniak, A. and Gluba, T., 2005 Changes of feed bulk density during drum granulation of bentonite Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing 30 219–228.Google Scholar
Hollewand, M.P. and Gladden, L.F., 1992 Modelling of diffusion and reaction in porous catalysts using a random three-dimensional network model Chemical Engineering Science 47 1761–1770 10.1016/0009-2509(92)85023-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilavsky, J. Berndt, C.C. and Karthikeyan, J., 1997 Mercury intrusion porosimetry of plasma-sprayed ceramic Journal of Material Science 32 3925–3932 10.1023/A:1018612815364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaroniec, M. Kruk, M. and Olivier, J., 1997 Fractal analysis of composite adsorption isotherms obtained by using density functional theory data for argon in slitlike pores Langmuir 13 1280–1285 10.1021/la960011z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzebski, A.B. Lorenc, J. and Pajak, L., 1997 Surface fractal characteristics of silica aerogels Langmuir 13 1031–1035 10.1021/la960011z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G., 2001 Comparison of soil pore characteristics obtained from desorption isotherms and mercury intrusion (in Polish) Acta Agrophysica 53 93–100.Google Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G. Muranyi, A. Szatanik-Kloc, A. Farkas, C. and Gyuricza, C., 2001 Changes of surface fine pore and variable charge properties of a brown forest soil under various tillage practices Soil and Tillage Research 59 127–135 10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00159-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G. Muranyi, A. and Fenyvesi, E., 2001 Effect of cyclodextrins on surface and pore properties of soil clay minerals Environmental Science & Technology 35 4947–4952 10.1021/es010083z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jozefaciuk, G. Hoffmann, C. and Marschner, B., 2002 Effect of extreme acid and alkali treatment on pore properties of soil samples Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 165 59–66 10.1002/1522-2624(200202)165:1<59::AID-JPLN59>3.0.CO;2-T.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G., Muranyi, A., and Fenyvesi, E. (2003) Effect of randomly methylated beta-cyclodextrin on physical properties of soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozak, E. Stawinski, J. and Wierzcho, J., 1991 Reliability of mercury intrusion porosimetry results for solids Soil Science 152 1325–1328 10.1097/00010694-199112000-00002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laskar, M.A.I. Kumar, R. and Bhattacharjee, B., 1997 Some aspects of evaluation of concrete through mercury intrusion porosimetry Cement and Concrete Research 27 93–105 10.1016/S0008-8846(96)00192-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, G.P., 1977 Measurement of pore sizes in fine-textured soils — a review of existing techniques Journal of Soil Science 28 527–540 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1977.tb02261.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B., 1982 The Fractal Geometry of Nature San Francisco, USA Freeman.Google Scholar
Moore, C.A. and Donaldson, C.F., 1995 Quantifying soil microstructure using fractals Geotechnique 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neimark, A.V. and Le Van, M.D.D., 1996 Characterization of rough surfaces Fundamentals of Adsorption Boston, Massachusetts, USA Kluwer Academic Publishers 659–666 10.1007/978-1-4613-1375-5_82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notario, J.S. Garcia, J.E. Caceres, J.M. Arteaga, I.J. and Gonzalez, M.M., 1995 Characterization of natural phillipsite modified with orthophosphoric acid Applied Clay Science 10 209–217 10.1016/0169-1317(95)00025-Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachepsky, Y.A. Polubesova, T.A. Hajnos, M. Sokolowska, Z. and Jozefaciuk, G., 1995 Fractal parameters of pore surface area as influences by simulated soil degradation Soil Science Society of America Journal 59 68–75 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900010010x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliali, M. Raglione, M. Panini, T. Maletta, M. and La Marca, M., 1995 The structure of two alluvial soils in Italy after 10 years of conventional and minimum tillage Soil and Tillage Research 34 209–223 10.1016/0167-1987(95)00471-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penumadu, D. and Dean, J., 2000 Compressibility effect in evaluating the pore-size distribution of kaolin clay using mercury intrusion porosimetry Canadian Geotechnical Journal 37 393–405 10.1139/t99-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, P. Todoroff, P. Touma, J. and Fortier, M., 1999 Determining the hydraulic properties of a Sahelian crusted soil. 1. In field experiment and measurements Agronomie 19 331–340 10.1051/agro:19990501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrier, E. Bird, N. and Rieu, M., 1999 Generalizing the fractal model of soil structure: the pore-solid fractal approach Geoderma 88 137–164 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00102-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringrose-Voase, A.J. and Bullock, P., 1984 The automatic recognition and measurement of soil pore types by image analysis and computer programs Journal of Soil Science 35 673–684 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1984.tb00624.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, E. Gens, A. and Lloret, A., 1999 Water permeability, water retention and microstructure of unsaturated compacted Boom clay Engineering Geology 54 117–127 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00067-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouquerol, R. Avnir, D. Fairbridge, C.W. Everett, D.H. Haynes, J.H. Pernicone, N. Ramsay, J.D.F. Sing, K.S.W. and Unger, K.K., 1994 Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids Pure and Applied Chemistry 66 1739–1758 10.1351/pac199466081739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouquerol, F. Rouquerol, J. and Sing, K., 1999 Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids London Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, C.E. Arands, R.R. van der Sloot, H.A. and Kosson, D.S., 1997 Modelling of the gaseous diffusion coefficient through unsaturated soil systems Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sing, K.S.W., 1982 Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with the special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity Pure and Applied Chemistry 54 2201–2218 10.1351/pac198254112201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolowska, Z. and Sokolowski, S., 1999 Influence of humic acid on surface fractal dimension of kaolin: analysis of mercury porosimetry and water vapour adsorption data Geoderma 88 233–249 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00107-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sposito, G. and Sposito, G., 1984 The solvent properties of adsorbed water The Surface Chemistry of Soils New York Oxford University Press 69–72.Google Scholar
Srasra, E. and Trabelsi-Ayedi, M., 2000 Textural properties of acid activated glauconite Applied Clay Science 17 71–84 10.1016/S0169-1317(00)00008-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez Barrios, M. Flores González, L.V. Vicente Rodríguez, M.A. and Martín Pozas, J.M., 1995 Acid activation of a palygorskite with HCl: Development of physico-chemical, textural and surface properties Applied Clay Science 10 247–258 10.1016/0169-1317(95)00007-Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temuujin, J. Jadamba, T. Burma, G. Erdenechimeg, S. Amarsana, J. and MacKenzie, K.J.D., 2004 Characterisation of acid activated montmorillonite clay from Tuulant (Mongolia) Ceramics International 30 251–255 10.1016/S0272-8842(03)00096-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A.H. Katz, A.J. and Krohn, C.E., 1987 The microgeometry and transport properties of sedimentary rocks Advances in Physics 36 625–694 10.1080/00018738700101062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Damme, H., Baveye, P. Parlange, J.Y. and Stewart, B.A., 1998 Structural hierarchy and molecular accessibility in clayey aggregates Fractals in Soil Science Boca Raton, Florida, USA CRC Press 55–74.Google Scholar
Van Damme, H. Levitz, P. Bergaya, F. Altcover, J.F. Gatineau, L. and Fripiat, J., 1986 Monolayer adsorption on fractal surfaces: a simple two-dimensional simulation Journal of Chemical Physics 85 616–624 10.1063/1.451587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volzone, C. and Hipedinger, N., 1997 Mercury porosimetry of compacted clay minerals Zhurnal of Pflanzenernaehrung und Bodenkunde 160 357–360 10.1002/jpln.19971600303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R.E. Dyson, J.S. Gerstl, Z. and Yaron, B., 1986 Leaching of herbicides through undisturbed cores of a structured clay soil Soil Science Society of America Journal 50 277–283 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000020004x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoya, N. Yamamato, K. and Funakuro, N., 1989 Fractal-based analysis and interpolation of 3D natural surface shapes and their application to terrain modelling Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing 46 284–302 10.1016/0734-189X(89)90034-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar