Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T12:25:18.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanism of NH3 Adsorption by Montmorillonite and Kaolinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

D. W. James  and
M. E. Harward
D. W. James
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA Irrigation Experiment Station, Washington State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
M. E. Harward
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dry, homoionic systems of two montmorillonites and a kaolinite were treated with NH3 and then evacuated exhaustively to eliminate any physically adsorbed ammonia. It was concluded that the NH3 retained by the minerals was associated with the exchangeable cations. The mechanism of this adsorption process is the same as that which leads to the formation of inorganic ammines, namely, the mutual attraction between unshared electrons in the NH3 molecules and ionic centers of positive charge. This sorption process is reversible at elevated temperatures and is described by the equation, nNH3 + CX ⇄ (nNH3 · C)X, where n is the number of NH3 molecules associated with each exchangeable cation, C, on exchange complex X. Accordingly, n is a coordination number and has the following values for the cations indicated: NH4, 0; K, 0; H, 1; Ca, 2; Mg, 2; Alin, 3; Alex, 6. Here in and ex refer to interior and exterior exchange sites respectively. The retention of NH3 by cations which saturate the exchange complex of clays was shown to be analogous to the formation of ammoniates by reaction of NH3 with inorganic salts.

A reduced retention of NH3 by the Mg and Al 1:1 systems was ascribed to the possibility that exchangeable Mg and Al on kaolinite occur as hydroxy complexes.

A significant amount of NH3 was adsorbed to the weak acid hydroxyl groups on the broken clay edges, Relative to exchange capacities this phenomenon was greater in magnitude on the 1:1 than on the 2:1 clays.

Energies of NH3 adsorption on CaCl2, Ca-bentonite and NH4-bentonite were determined. Values of △H as a function of temperature were shown to be different for the Ca and NH4-clay systems. The data indicated stronger energies of retention of NH3 by the Ca-clay than for the NH4 clay. The thermodynamic data thus support the mechanisms proposed here.

Type
General Session
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 11 , February 1962 , pp. 301 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Technical paper no. 1604, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis, Oregon. This paper includes portions of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree at Oregon State University. Appreciation is expressed to J. L. Young U.S.D.A., A.R.S., Corvallis, for helpful discussions and exchange of ideas during the conduct of these studies.

Formerly Instructor, Oregon State University

References

Barrer, R. M., and MacLeod, D. M. (1954) Intercalation and sorption by montmorillonite: Trans. Faraday Soc., v. 50, pp. 980–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottini, O. Von. (1937) Uber die thermische Zersetzung von ammonium-permutit, ammonium bentonite und ammoniumton: Kolloid Zeitschrift, v. 78, pp. 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James M., and Bartholomew, W. V. (1962) Sorption of anhydrous ammonia by dry clay systems: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 26, pp. 258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buswell, A. M., and Dudenbostel, B. F. (1941) Spectroscopic studies of base-exchange materials: J. Amer. Chem. Soc., v. 63, pp. 2554–2559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornet, I. (1943) Sorption of NH3 on montmorillonite: J. Chem. Physics, v. 11, pp. 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L., and Chang, S. C. (1947) Anhydrous ammonia retention by soils as influenced by depth of application, soil texture, moisture content, pH value, and tilth: J. Amer. Soc. Agrori., v. 39, pp. 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, H., Ayers, A. D., and Hosking, J. S. (1945) Comparative behavior of ammonia and ammonium salts in soils: Hilgardia, v. 16, pp. 429–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortland, M. M. (1955) Adsorption of ammonia by clays and mucks: Soil Sci., v. 80, pp. 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortland, M. M. (1958) Reactions of ammonia in soils: Adv. in Agron., v. 10, pp. 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, J. R. (1951) An Advanced Treatise on Physical Chemistry, v. II: Longmans Green, London, 448 pp.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, N. V. (1950) The Chemical Elements and Their Compounds: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1700 pp.Google Scholar
Slabaugh, W. H., and Siegel, R. H. (1956) Sorption of ammonia by homoionic bentonites: J. Phys. Chem., v. 60, pp. 1105–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. W. (1960) Forms of aluminum in cation exchangers: Trans. 7th Int. Cong. Soil Sci., v. 2, pp. 364–369.Google Scholar