Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T00:37:30.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface properties of mixed Cu(II)—tetraalkylammonium montmorillonites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

M. B. McBride  and
M. M. Mortland
M. B. McBride
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, U.S.A.
M. M. Mortland
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Initial exchange of Cu(II)-montmorillonite by tetrapropylammonium (TPA) or tetramethylammonium (TMA) ions results in segregation of different ions in randomly interstratified layers, with particular preference for TPA over Cu(II) during exchange. More complete exchange reverses this preference and both Cu(II)-TPA and Cu(II)-TMA clays become more homogeneous. The copper ions of the homogeneous Cu(II)-TPA clays are not fully hydrated while the TMA ions have less effect than TPA on the hydration of copper, probably a result of the smaller radius and higher hydration energy of TMA. Methods of X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, BET surface area determinations, as well as infrared and electron spin resonance spectroscopy, are used in supplying evidence of cation distribution and hydration properties of these clays. Definite changes in the properties of hydrated copper when associated with tetraalkylammonium ions on the clay surface are indicated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , July 1975 , pp. 357 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrer, R.M. & Brummer, K. (1962) Trans. Faraday Soc. 59, 959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrer, R.M. & MacLeod, D.M. (1955) Trans. Faraday Soc. 51, 1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrer, R.M. & Reay, J.S.S. (1957) Trans. Faraday Soc. 53, 1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clementz, D.M. & Mortland, M.M. (1974) Clays Clay Miner, (in press).Google Scholar
Clementz, D.M., Pinnavaia, T.J. & Mortland, M.M. (1973) J. Phys. Chem. 77, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Kanungo, J.L. & Chakravarti, S.K. (1971) J. Colloid Interface Sci. 35, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doner, H.E. & Mortland, M.M. (1969) Science 166, 1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, D.B., Mortland, M.M. & Pinnavaia, T.J. (1973) Clays Clay Miner. 21, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gast, R.G. & Mortland, M.M. (1971) J. Colloid Interface Sci. 37, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, R. & Merino, J. (1954) Clay Min. Bull. 2, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudson, M.I. & Mcatee, J.L. (1973) Clays Clay Miner. 21, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcbride, M.B. & Mortland, M.M. (1973) Clays Clay Miner. 21, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcbride, M.B. & Mortland, M.M. (1974) Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38, 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, J. (1973) J. Chem. Soc, Faraday Trans. II 9 1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J.D. & Farmer, V.C. (1964) Clay Min. Bull. 5, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theng, B.K.G., Greenland, D.J. & Quirk, J.P. (1968) Clay Miner. 7, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar