Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T18:52:39.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low-frequency electrical conductivity of aqueous kaolinite suspensions: surface conductance, electrokinetic potentials and counterion mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Christian Weber  and
Helge Stanjek
Christian Weber*
Affiliation:
Clay and Interface Mineralogy, RWTH Aachen University, Bunsenstrasse 8, 52072 Aachen, Germany
Helge Stanjek
Affiliation:
Clay and Interface Mineralogy, RWTH Aachen University, Bunsenstrasse 8, 52072 Aachen, Germany
*
*E-mail: chris.weber@chemie.tu-freiberg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The low-frequency conductivity of aqueous kaolinite suspensions has been measured as a function of volume fraction and concentration of KCl, K2SO4 and BaCl2, respectively. These measurements were interpreted with a theoretical model accounting for surface conductivity and particle shape. For the first time, an internally consistent data set was established by measuring all parameters necessary to solve the relevant equations. The simultaneous availability of surface conductivity, surface charge density and diffuse layer charge density permitted the estimation of counterion mobilities in the stagnant layer and a consistency check for the evaluation procedure of the conductivity experiments. In agreement with current literature results, monovalent counterions were found to have a Stern layer mobility similar to their bulk mobility, whereas the mobility of divalent counterions in this layer is reduced by a factor of ∼2.

Keywords

surface conductancesurface charge densityzeta potentialStern layer mobilitycation exchange capacitykaolinite
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 299 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany

References

Amirianshoja, T., Junin, R., Idris, A.K. & Rahmani, O. (2013) A comparative study of surfactant adsorption by clay minerals. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 101, 21–27.Google Scholar
Arroyo, F.J., Carrique, F., Jiménez-Olivares, M.L. & Delgado, A.V. (2000) Rheological and electrokinetic properties of sodium montmorillonite suspensions. II Low-frequency dielectric dispersion. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 229, 118–122.Google Scholar
Arulanandan, K. & Mitchell, J.K. (1968) Low frequency dielectric dispersion of clay-water-electrolyte systems. Clays and Clay Minerals, 16, 337–351.Google Scholar
Bergaya, F., Lagaly, G. & Vayer, M. (2006) Cation and anion exchange. Pp. 979–1001 in: Handbook of Clay Science (Bergaya, F., Theng, B.K.G. & Lagaly, G., editors). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bersillon, J.-L., Villieras, F., Michot, L. & Cases, J.-M. (2003) A new way of assessing clay cation adsorption using normalized salt concentration. Clay Minerals, 38, 233–242.Google Scholar
Bikerman, J.J. (1935) Die Oberflächenleitfähigkeit und ihre Bedeutung. Kolloid Zeitschrift, 72, 100–108.Google Scholar
Bolland, M.D.A., Posner, A.M. & Quirk, J.P. (1976) Surface charge on kaolinites in aqueous suspension. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 14, 197–216.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. & Robinson, K. (1946) The structure of kaolinite. Mineralogical Magazine, 27, 242–253.Google Scholar
Chassagne, C. & Bedeaux, D. (2008) The dielectric response of a colloidal spheroid. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 326, 240–253.Google Scholar
Chassagne, C., Mietta, F. & Winterwerp, J.C. (2009) Electrokinetic study of kaolinite suspensions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 336, 352–359.Google Scholar
Chhih, A., Turq, P., Bernard, O., Barthel, J.M.G. & Blum, L. (1994) Transport coefficients and apparent charges of concentrated electrolyte solutions – Equations for practical use. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für Physikalische Chemie, 98, 1516–1525.Google Scholar
Choo, H., Song, J., Lee, W. & Lee, C. (2016) Effects of clay fraction and pore water conductivity on electrical conductivity of sand-kaolinite mixed soils. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 147, 735–745.Google Scholar
Delgado, A.V., Gonzalez-Caballero, F., Hunter, R., Koopal, L.K. & Lyklema, J. (2007) Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 209, 194–224.Google Scholar
Dixon, J.B. (1989) Kaolin and serpentine group minerals. Pp. 467–525 in: Minerals in Soil Environments (Dixon, J.B. & Weed, S., editors). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Dukhin, S.S. & Shilov, V.N. (1980) Kinetic aspects of elctrochemistry of disperse systems. Part II. Induced dipole moment and the non-equilibrium double layer of a colloid particle. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 13, 153–195.Google Scholar
Ferris, A.P. & Jepson, W.B. (1975) The exchange capacities of kaolinite and the preparation of homoionic clays. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 51, 245–259.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, L.C., Hutcheon, I., Wardlaw, N. & Melloul, A.J. (1993) Rearrangement of fine particles in porous media causing reduction of permeability and formation of preferred pathways of flow: Experimental findings and a conceptual model. Transport in Porous Media, 13, 221–237.Google Scholar
Grosse, C. (2009) Generalization of a classic thin double layer polarization theory of colloidal suspensions to electrolyte solutions with different ion valences. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113, 8911–8924.Google Scholar
Haynes, W.M., Lide, D.R. & Bruno, T.J., editors (2012) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 93rd edition , CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science – principles and applications. Pp. 1–386 in: Colloid Science: A Series of Monographs (Ottewill, R.H. & Rowell, R.L., editors). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. & Alexander, A.E. (1963a) Surface properties and flow behavior of kaolinite Part I: Electrophoretic mobility and stability of kaolinite sols. Journal of Colloid Science, 18, 820–832.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. & Alexander, A.E. (1963b) Surface properties and flow behavior of kaolinite Part II: Electrophoretic studies of anion adsorption. Journal of Colloid Science, 18, 833–845.Google Scholar
Ishida, T., Makino, T. & Wang, C. (2000) Dielectric-relaxation spectroscopy of kaolinite, montmorillonite, allophane and imogolite under moist conditions. Clays and Clay Minerals, 48, 75–84.Google Scholar
Jennings, B.R. & Parslow, K. (1988) Particle size measurement: The equivalent spherical diameter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Physical, Mathematical and Engineering Sciences, 419, 137–149.Google Scholar
Jenny, H. (1932) Studies on the mechanism of ionic exchange in colloidal aluminum silicates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 36, 2217–2258.Google Scholar
Jenny, H. (1936) Simple kinetic theory of ionic exchange. I Ions of equal valency. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 40, 501–517.Google Scholar
Jiménez, M.L. & Bellini, T. (2010) The electrokinetic behavior of charged non-spherical colloids. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 15, 131–144.Google Scholar
Jiménez, M.L., Arroyo, F.J., Carrique, F., Kaatze, U. & Delgado, A.V. (2005) Determination of stagnant layer conductivity in polystyrene suspensions: temperature effects. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 281, 503–509.Google Scholar
Löbbus, M., van Leeuwen, H.P. & Lyklema, J. (2000) Streaming potentials and conductivities of latex plugs. Influence of the valency of the counterion. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 161, 103–113.Google Scholar
Lockhart, N.C. (1980) Electrical properties and the surface characteristics and structure of clays II. Kaolinite – a non-swelling clay. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 74, 520–529.Google Scholar
Lorenz, P.B. (1969) Surface conductance and electrokinetic properties of kaolinite beds. Clays and Clay Minerals, 17, 223–231.Google Scholar
Lyklema, J. (1991) Transport phenomena in interface and colloid science. Pp. 6.1–6.97 in: Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science (Lyklema, J., editor). Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
Lyklema, J. (1995) Electric double layers. Pp. 3.1–3.232 in: Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science (Lyklema, J., editor). Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
Lyklema, J. (2001) Surface conduction. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 13, 5027–5034.Google Scholar
Lyklema, J. (2002) Specificity in the statics and dynamics of surface-confined ions. Molecular Physics, 100, 3177–3185.Google Scholar
Lyklema, J. (2003) Lyotropic sequences in colloid stability revisited. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 100–102, 1–12.Google Scholar
Lyklema, J. (2011) Surface charges and electrokinetic charges: Distinctions and juxtapositionings. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 376, 2–8.Google Scholar
Lyklema, J. & Minor, M. (1998) On surface conduction and its role in electrokinetics. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 140, 33–41.Google Scholar
Ma, C. & Eggleton, R.A. (1999) Cation exchange capacity of kaolinite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 174–180.Google Scholar
Minor, M., van Leeuwen, H.P. & Lyklema, J. (1998a) Low-frequency dielectric response of polystyrene latex dispersions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 206, 397–406.Google Scholar
Minor, M., van der Linde, A.J. & Lyklema, J. (1998b) Streaming potentials and conductivities of latex plugs in indifferent electrolytes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 203, 177–188.Google Scholar
O'Brien, R.W. & Rowlands, W.N. (1993) Measuring the surface conductance of kaolinite particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 159, 471–476.Google Scholar
O'Brien, R.W. & Ward, D.N. (1988) The electrophoresis of a spheroid with a thin double layer. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 121, 402–413.Google Scholar
Rasmusson, M., Rowlands, W.N., O'Brien, R.W. & Hunter, R. (1997) The dynamic mobility and dielectric response of sodium bentonite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 189, 92–100.Google Scholar
Revil, A. (2012) Spectral induced polarization of shaly sands: Influence of the electrical double layer. Water Resources Research, 48, 1–23.Google Scholar
Revil, A. (2014) Comment on: On the relationship between induced polarization and surface conductivity: Implications for petrophysical interpretation of electrical measurements. Geophysics, 79, X1–X10.Google Scholar
Rouquerol, J., Avnir, D., Fairbridge, C.W., Everett, D.H., Haynes, J.H., Pernicone, N., Ramsay, J.D.F., Sing, K.S.W. & Unger, K.K. (1994) Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 66, 1739–1758.Google Scholar
Rowlands, W.N. & O'Brien, R.W. (1995) The dynamic mobility and dielectric response of kaolinite particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 175, 190–200.Google Scholar
Schofield, R.K. & Samson, H.R. (1954) Flocculation of kaolinite due to attraction of oppositely charged crystal faces. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 18, 135–154.Google Scholar
Stanjek, H. & Künkel, D. (2016) CEC determination with Cu-triethylenetetramine: recommendations for improving reproducibility and accuracy. Clay Minerals, 51, 1–18.Google Scholar
Swartzen-Allen, S.L. & Matijević, E. (1974) Surface and colloid chemistry of clays. Chemical Reviews, 74, 385–400.Google Scholar
Thommes, M., Kaneko, K., Neimark, A.V., Olivier, J.P., Rodriguez-Reinso, F., Rouquerol, J. & Sing, S.W. (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 87, 1051–1069.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, I.F., Bunker, B.A. & Cygan, R.T. (2007) Molecular dynamics modeling of ion adsorption to the basal surfaces of kaolinite. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 111, 6753–6762.Google Scholar
Weber, C. & Stanjek, H. (2012) Development of diffuse double layers in column-wicking experiments: Implications for pH-dependent contact angles on quartz. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 387, 270–274.Google Scholar
Weber, C., Heuser, M., Mertens, G. & Stanjek, H. (2014) Determination of clay mineral aspect ratios from conductometric titrations. Clay Minerals, 49, 17–26.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. (1959) Über das Kationenaustauschvermögen der Tonminerale. III Der Kationenaustausch bei Kaolinit. Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, 299, 92–120.Google Scholar
Weller, A., Slater, L. & Nordsiek, S. (2013) On the relationship between induced polarization and surface conductivity: Implications for petrophysical interpretation of electrical measurements. Geophysics, 78, D315–D325.Google Scholar
White, L.R. (1982) Capillary rise in powders. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 90, 536–538.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z. & Gunter, W. (1992) The nature of the surface charge of kaolinite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 40, 365–368.Google Scholar