Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:06:47.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Unique “Blooming and Contending” 1961–62

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Extract

From its inception until at least the Cultural Revolution, the Communist regime in China has had a twofold aim for its intellectuals: it has sought to indoctrinate them with the exclusive ideologies of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, and it has tried to utilize their skills to develop an industrialized and modernized society. The Chinese Communist Party has attempted to implement these two policies by an insistence on the strict orthodoxy of thinking individuals, on the one hand, and by the encouragement of intellectuals to work creatively at their jobs on the other. This contradictory approach has resulted in a policy toward the intellectuals that has been alternatively severe and relaxed. Though the main trend is usually in one direction or the other, there have always been counter-currents present which can be revived when necessary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The relaxations of 1953–54 and the Hundred Flowers are discussed in the author's book Literary Dissent in Communist China, Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar There have been numerous books on the Hundred Flowers movement, among them MacFarquhar, Roderick, The Hundred Flowers, London, 1960Google Scholar; and Chen, Theodore, Thought Re-form of the Chinese Intellectuals, Hong Kong, 1960.Google ScholarDoolin, Dennis wrote an article on the 1961–62 relaxation in Current Scene, Vol. II, No. 19, 1 September 1963.Google Scholar

2 Survey of China Mainland Magazines (SCMM) No. 266, p. 32. “Concerning the Question of Letting all Schools of Thought Contend,”Google Scholar by Shu-chih, Liu, Hung-ch'i (Red Flag), No. 11, 1 June 1961.Google Scholar

3 Reprinted in Peking Review No. 12, 24 March, 1961, p. 6.Google Scholar

4 Kung-tso T'ung-hsun, Politics of the Chinese Red Army, by Cheng, Chester, Stanford, 1963, p. 755.Google Scholar

5 Kuang-ming Jih-pao (KMJP), 3 September 1961, p. 2. This is a reprint of Ch'en Yi's speech given at the Peking Institute of Higher Studies.Google Scholar

8 Survey of the China Mainland Press (SCMP), No. 2776, p. 8.Google Scholar

9 Ibid. p. 5.

10 Ibid. p. 15.

11 Wen-i Pao, No. 3, 1961, p. 2.Google Scholar

12 Ibid. p. 3.

13 Shanghai Wen-hsüeh, No. 5, 1962, p. 3.Google Scholar

16 Ibid. p. 4.

18 Ibid. p. 6.

19 KMJP No. 3 September 1961, p. 2.Google Scholar

21 SCMP, No. 2512, p. 11, “Meetings of Immortals Drive The Intellectuals Forward in Self-Remoulding,”Google Scholar by Kuo-chün, Liu, People's Daily, 16 May 1961.Google Scholar

22 Cho, K'ang, “Shih-lun chin-nien chien-ti tuan-p'ien hsiao-shuo” (“On Short Stories in Recent Years”), Wen-hsüeh p'ing-lun, No. 5, 1962, p. 26.Google Scholar

23 SCMP, No. 3750, p. 3. Cho's, K'ang speeches at the Dairen Conference have not been reprinted, but large excerpts from them were published in Canton Yang-ch'eng Wan-pao, 7 July 1966.Google Scholar

26 Ibid. p. 5.

27 Ch'üan-lin, Shao, Ying Hsiung (Heroes), Shanghai, 1948, p. 2.Google Scholar

28 Ibid. p. 3.

29 Wen-i Pao, No. 8/9, 1964, p. 15.Google Scholar Shao Ch'üan-lin's remarks, like K'ang Cho's, were not published at the time he gave them. However, excerpts were reprinted after he was attacked in 1964 in Wen-i Pao, No. 8/9, 1964 (30 September 1964), pp. 1520.Google Scholar

30 Ibid. p. 18.

31 Ibid. pp. 17–18.

32 Ibid. p. 18.

33 Han, Wu, Hai Jui pa-kuan (The Dismissal of Hai Jui), Peking Publishing Co., 1961, pp. 78.Google Scholar

34 Union Research Service, Vol. 25, No. 2, p. 23.Google Scholar Reprint of an article by Han, T'ien, “The Problem of Choosing Themes,” from Wen-i Pao, No. 7, 1961.Google Scholar

35 James Pusey called my attention to this article. His monograph on “The Wu Han Campaign” will be published in the Harvard East Asian Monograph series.Google Scholar

36 Han, Wu, Hai Jui pa-kuan, p. 24.Google Scholar

37 Union Research Service, Vol. 25, No. 2, p. 20.Google Scholar

38 Han, T'ien, “Hsieh Yao-huan,” Chü-pen (Theatre Book), July/August, 1961, p. 9.Google Scholar

41 Ibid. p. 19.

41 Ibid. p. 28.

42 Han, Wu, Hai Jui pa-kuan, p. 27.Google Scholar

43 T'o, Teng, “A Concern for All Things,” Yen-shan yeh-hua (Evening Talks at Yen-shan), Vol. 2, Peking Publishing Co., 1962, p. 60.Google Scholar

45 Ibid. p. 61.

46 Ibid. p. 62.

49 Current Background CB, No. 742,Google ScholarT'o, Teng, “Is Shrewdness Dependable,” Evening Talks at Yen-shan, Vol. 4, pp. 1719.Google Scholar

52 T'o, Teng, “A New School of Thought,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 2, p. 13.Google Scholar

53 T'o, Teng, “Understanding,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 2, p. 90.Google Scholar

54 Ibid. p. 91.

55 T'o, Teng, “A Small Key,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 2, p. 97.Google Scholar

56 T'o, Teng“Talking Nonsense,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 2. p. 23.Google Scholar

58 T'o, Teng“New Lyrical Poems,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 2, p. 68.Google Scholar

59 T'o, Teng“Study More, Criticize Less,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 2, p. 84.Google Scholar

61 CB, No. 792, p. 4.Google Scholar“A Special Treatment of Amnesia,” Ch'ien-hsien, No. 14, 1962Google Scholar under the column Notes from A Three Family Village.Google Scholar

62 T'o, Teng, “The Theory of Treasuring Labour Power,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 1 (Peking, 1961), p. 56.Google Scholar

63 Ibid. p. 57.

64 Ibid. p. 58.

65 T'o, Teng“An Egg as an Asset,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 1, p. 77.Google Scholar

67 SCMP, No. 3706, p. 12.Google Scholar

68 Ibid. p. 11.

69 T'o, Teng, “From Three to Ten Thousand,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 1, pp. 3334.Google Scholar

70 T'o, Teng, “How to Make Friends,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 1, p. 51.Google Scholar

72 T'o, Teng“Who Were The Earliest Discoverers of America,” Yen-shan yeh-hua, Vol. 2, p. 3.Google Scholar

73 CB, No. 792, p. 2.Google Scholar“Great Empty Talk,” Ch'ien-hsien, No. 21, 1961, published under the column Notes From A Three Family Village.Google Scholar