Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:34:09.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Origins of the Chinese Scientific Elite*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

The literature on China's social stratification and mobility has discussed the roles of family background and an individual's education attainment. This article aims to extend the existing literature by examining the interplay of these two aspects in fostering a homogeneous group of scientists, the members (yuanshi) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS, Zhongguo kexueyuan). Since its establishment in 1955, honorific CAS membership has been awarded to outstanding Chinese scientists in their respective fields. As of the end of 1997, a total of 859 Chinese natural scientists, including 40 women, had been elected to the five Academic Divisions of the CAS – Mathematics and Physics, Chemistry, Biological Sciences, Earth Sciences, and Technological Sciences (Table 1) – of whom 610 were alive. They have been renowned, nationally if not internationally, for their academic achievements and contributions, and they have a reputation and prestige similar to those enjoyed by their counterparts in other countries, such as members of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States and fellows of the Royal Society in Britain. Because the occupational prestige of scientists is very high in China, as it is in other countries, and following similar research on the scientific elite, it is reasonable to define CAS members as the Chinese scientific elite.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See, for example, Bian, Yanjie, Work and Inequality in Urban China (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Blau, Peter M. and Ruan, Danqing, “Inequality of opportunity in urban China and America,” Research in Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 8 (1990), pp. 332Google Scholar; Davis, Deborah, “‘Skidding’: downward mobility among children of the Maoist middle class,” Modern China, Vol. 18, No. 4 (1992), pp. 410437CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Deng, Zhong and Treiman, Donald, “The impact of the Cultural Revolution on trends in educational attainment in the People's Republic of China,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 2 (1997), pp. 391428CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lin, Nan and Bian, Yanjie, “Getting ahead in urban China,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 97, No. 3 (1991), pp. 657688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. For a detailed history of the CAS membership, see Cao, Cong, “The changing dynamic between science and politics: evolution of the highest academic honor in China, 1949–1998,” Isis, Vol. 90, No. 2 (1999), pp. 298324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Others passed away, except Fang Lizhi, whose membership was revoked for his alleged involvement in the Tiananmen Square Incident of 1989.

4. Bian, Yanjie, “Chinese occupational prestige: a comparative analysis,” International Sociology, Vol. 11, No. 2 (1996), pp. 161186CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lin, Nan and Xie, Wen, “Occupational prestige in urban China,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, No. 4 (1988), pp. 793832CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Zhang, Zhongliang, “People and science: public attitudes in China toward science and technology,” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 18, No. 5 (1991), pp. 311317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. See, for example, Boffey, Philip M., The Brain Bank of America: An Inquiry into the Politics of Science (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975)Google Scholar; Crosland, Maurice, Science under Control: The French Academy of Sciences, 1795–1914 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zuckerman, Harriet, Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United Slates (New York: The Free Press, 1977).Google Scholar

6. Biographical information on CAS members was drawn from the following sources: Zhongguo keyuan yinghua lu (Elite in Chinese Science), 2 vols. (Beijing: Kexue puji chubanshe, 1985 and 1988)Google Scholar; 1991 Nian Zhongguo kexueyuan xuebu weiyuan (1991 Academic Division Members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) (Zhejiang: Zhejiang kexue jishu chubanshe, 1993)Google Scholar; Kexue (Science), Vol. 46, No. 5–6 (1994)Google Scholar; Vol. 47, No. 1–3 (1995); Zhongguo kexue bao (China's Science News), overseas edition, 26 02 1996, p. 6Google Scholar; Jiaxi, Lu (ed.), Zhongguo xiandai kexuejia zhuanji (Biographies of Contemporary Chinese Scientists), 6 vols. (Beijing: Kexue chubanshe, 19911994)Google Scholar; Zhongguo kexueyuan xuebu lianhe bangongshi (General Office of the Academic Divisions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) (ed.), Zhongguo kexue yuan yuanshi zishu (Autobiographical Notes of Members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) (Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe, 1996).Google Scholar These sources are reliable because of the participation of the CAS members themselves. Despite the incompleteness in some entries, the data set as a whole is the most comprehensive. In addition, interviews with 79 CAS members were conducted in China between October 1995 and February 1996, and between October and November 1997.

7. China's elites in the fields other than science have been a subject of intensive scholarly research. See, for example, Goldstein, Avery, “Trends in the study of political elites and institutions in China,” The China Quarterly, No. 139 ( 1994), pp.714730CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Li, Cheng and White, Lynn III, “The army in the succession to Deng Xiaoping,” Asian Survey, Vol. 33, No. 8 (1993), pp. 757786Google Scholar; Zang, Xiaowei, “Provincial elite in post-Mao China,” Asian Survey, Vol. 31, No. 6 (1991), pp. 512525CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zang, Xiaowei, “Ethnic representation in the current Chinese leadership,” The China Quarterly, No. 153 (1998), pp. 107127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Zuckerman, , Scientific Elite, p. 82.Google Scholar

9. Giddens, Anthony, Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979), p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Renmin ribao (People's Daily), overseas edition, 21 11 1992, p. 4.Google Scholar

11. Skinner, G. William, “Regional urbanization in nineteenth-century China,” in Skinner, G. William (ed.), The City in Late Imperial China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1977), pp. 211249.Google Scholar

12. Bell, Lynda S., “Farming, sericulture, and peasant rationality in Wuxi county in the early twentieth century,” in Rawski, Thomas G. and Li, Lillian M. (eds.), Chinese History in Economic Perspective (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), pp. 207242.Google Scholar

13. Honig, Emily, “Native-place hierarchy and labor market segmentation: the case of Subei people in Shanghai,”Google Scholar in Rawski, and Li, , Chinese History in Economic Perspective, pp. 271294, on p. 272Google Scholar; Jacobs, J. Bruce, “Shanghai: an alternative centre?” in Goodman, David S. G. (ed.), China's Provinces in Reform: Class, Community and Political Culture (London & New York: Routledge, 1997), pp. 164195.Google Scholar

14. Fung, Ka-iu, Yan, Zhong-min and Ning, Yue-min, “Shanghai: China's world city,” in Yeung, Yue-man and Hu, Xu-wei (eds.), China's Coastal Cities – Catalysts for Modernization (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1992), pp. 124152, on p. 129Google Scholar; Jacobs, , “Shanghai: an alternative centre?”Google Scholar

15. Feiping, Guo, Zhongguo minguo jingji shi (A History of Economy in Republican China) (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1994), p. 4.Google Scholar At that time, Shanghai was a statistical unit of Jiangsu province.

16. Bin, Zhang, Cong Zhejiang kan Zhongguo jiaoyu jindaihua (On the Modernization of Chinese Education by Using Zhejiang as an Example) (Guangzhou: Guangdong jiaoyu chubanshe, 1996), p. 109.Google Scholar

17. Chang, Chungli, The Chinese Gentry (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1955), pp. 71164.Google Scholar

18. Bin, Zhang, On the Modernization of Chinese Education, p. 26.Google Scholar

19. Wang, Y. C., Chinese Intellectuals and the West, 1872–1949 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1966), pp. 15, 156164.Google Scholar

20. Buck, Peter, American Science and Modern China, 1876–1936 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 109.Google Scholar

21. Lutz, Jessie Gregory, China and the Christian Colleges, 1850–1950 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971), pp. 531–33.Google Scholar

22. Wang, , Chinese Intellectuals and the West, p. 156.Google Scholar

23. Mann, Susan, “Women's work in the Ningbo area, 1900–1936,”Google Scholar in Rawski, and Li, , Chinese History in Economic Perspective, pp. 243294, p. 246.Google Scholar

24. Wang, , Chinese Intellectuals and the West, p. 23.Google Scholar

25. Ibid. p. 123.

26. Ibid. p. 126.

27. Ibid. pp. 54–57, 100–104, 130–133.

28. Ogden, Suzanne, China's Unresolved Issues: Politics, Development, and Culture (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., second ed., 1992), p. 312Google Scholar; Shirk, Susan, “The evolution of Chinese education: stratification and meritocracy in the 1980s,” in Ginsbury, Norton and Lalor, Bernard A. (eds.), China: The 80s Era (Boulder: Westview Press, 1984), pp. 245272.Google Scholar

29. The exception has been some rural areas where the door has firmly shut by the communist regime with the persistent unwillingness of the central government to fund rural education and the economic underdevelopment in these areas.

30. Interview with a CAS member in space technology (Beijing, 1996).

31. Interview with a CAS member in quantum chemistry (Beijing, 1996).

32. Yuan, Wang, “Hua Luogeng,”Google Scholar in Jiaxi, Lu, Biographies, Vol. 1, p. 24.Google Scholar

33. Bourdieu, Pierre (trans. Nice, Richard), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), p. 23.Google Scholar

34. Wang, , Chinese Intellectuals and the West, p. 24.Google Scholar

35. Schurmann, Franz, Ideology and Organization in Communist China (Berkeley: University of California Press, second ed. 1968), p. 171.Google Scholar

36. Interview with a CAS member in pharmaceutical chemistry (Shanghai, 1995). The exception is probably during the Cultural Revolution when the advantage of coming from an educated family or an intelligentsia family was drastically reduced. For a discussion on this point, see Davis, , “‘Skidding’”Google Scholar; Deng, Zhong and Treiman, , “The impact of the Cultural Revolution, pp. 391428.Google Scholar

37. Borthwick, Sally, Education and Social Change in China: The Beginning of the Modern Era (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1983), pp. 114118.Google Scholar

38. It is speculated that the socio-economic status and/or educational level of these mothers' families were higher.

39. Interview with a CAS member in mineralogy and a CAS member in mechanics (Beijing, 1996).

40. Interview with a CAS member in theoretical physics (Beijing, 1995).

41. Interview with a CAS member in quantum chemistry (Shanghai, 1995).

42. Liang, Huang, in Autobiographical Notes of Members of the CAS, pp. 276–77.Google Scholar

43. Xiong Darun, in ibid. p. 191.

44. Honghai, Guo, “Zhang Cunhao,”Google Scholar in Jiaxi, Lu, Biographies, Vol. 1, p. 286.Google Scholar

45. His cousin was elected a CAS member in 1980, while his cousin's husband became a CAS member in 1957. Interview with a CAS member of theoretical physics (Beijing, 1995).

46. Blau, Peter M. and Duncan, Otis Dudley, The American Occupational Structure (New York: The Free Press, 1967), pp. 316320, 412.Google Scholar

47. Suttmeier, Richard P., Science, Technology and China's Drive for Modernization (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1980), p. 25Google Scholar; Taylor, Robert, China's Intellectual Dilemma: Politics and University Enrolment, 1949–1978 (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1981), pp. 1314.Google Scholar

48. The reorganization, following the Soviet model and carried under Soviet guidance, arbitrarily relocated faculty and students at some universities and colleges to other institutions. See Hayhoe, Ruth, China's Universities, 1895–1995: A Century of Cultural Conflict (New York: Garland Publishing, 1996), p. 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49. Israel, John, “Southwest Associated University: preservation as an ultimate value,” in Sih, Paul K. T. (ed.), Nationalist China during the Sino-Japanese War, 1937–1945 (Hicksiville, NY: Exposition Press, 1977), pp. 131154Google Scholar; Shipei, Qu, Zhongguo daxue jiaoyu fazhan shi (A Developmental History of University Education in China) (Shanxi: Shanxi jiaoyu chubanshe, 1993), pp. 522530.Google Scholar

50. Gaston, Jerry, “The reward system in British science,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1970), pp. 718732, on p. 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. Zuckerman, , Scientific Elite, p. 63.Google Scholar

52. Zhongguo gaodeng xuexiao jianjie weiyuanhui, bianshen (Editorial Board of China's Institutions of Higher Education) (ed.), Zhongguo gaodeng xuexiao jianjie (China's Institutions of Higher Education) (Beijing: Jiaoyu kexue chubanshe, 1982).Google Scholar

53. Daxuesheng (College Life), Nos. 4 and 9, 1997.Google Scholar

54. Shirk, , “The evolution of Chinese education,” p. 248.Google Scholar

55. Hayhoe, , China's Universities, pp. 149248Google Scholar; Montaperto, Ronald N., “China's education in perspective,” in Montaperto, Ronald N. and Henderson, Jay (eds.), China's Schools in Flux (White Plains, NY: M E. Sharpe, Inc., 1979), pp. 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, , China's Intellectual Dilemma, p. 11.Google Scholar

56. Zhong, Weihe and Hayhoe, Ruth, “Higher education in China: challenges of making foreign knowledge serve China,” in Smart, John (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (New York: Agathon Press, 1993), pp. 389427.Google Scholar

57. The number includes those who were first enrolled in Beijing University but graduated from South-west Associated University during the Anti-Japanese War (Exhibit, Department of Geology, Beijing University, 1995).

58. The role of foreign missions in China has been controversial to Chinese scholars. Kaiwen, Feng, Zhongguo minguo jiaoyu shi (A History of Education in Republican China) (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1994), pp. 2932, 181–83Google Scholar; Shipei, Qu, A Developmental History of University Education, pp. 359361Google Scholar; Kaiyuan, Zhang and Waldron, Arthur (eds.), Zhongxi wenhua yu jiaohui daxue: shoujie Zhongguo jiaohui daxue shi xueshu taolun hui (Christian Universities and Chinese-Western Culture: Papers from the First Symposium on the History of Christian Universities in China) (Wuhan: Hubei jiaoyu chubanshe, 1991).Google Scholar

59. Kaiwen, Feng, A History of Education, p. 30Google Scholar; Li, Peishan, “The introduction of American science and technology to China before 1949 and its impact,” in The U.S. and the Asia-Pacific Region in the Twentieth Century (Beijing: Modern Press, 1993), pp. 605606Google Scholar; Lutz, , China and the Christian Colleges, pp. 531–34Google Scholar; Yongling, Lu, “Standing between two worlds: Ma Xiangbo's educational thought and practice,” in Hayhoe, Ruth and Yongling, Lu (eds.). Ma Xiangbo and the Mind of Modern China 1840–1939 (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1996), pp. 143203, especially pp. 191–203.Google Scholar

60. Lutz, , China and the Christian Colleges, pp. 473484Google Scholar; Shipei, Qu, A Developmental History of University Education, pp. 642–46.Google Scholar

61. In addition, at least 17 CAS members abandoned doctoral degrees in 1937 when the Anti-Japanese War broke out, in 1949 when the People's Republic was established, and in the early 1960s when they were called on by the Party from the former Soviet Union. See various entries in Jiaxi, Lu, Biographies and Autobiographical Notes of Members of the CAS.Google Scholar

62. Various entries in Jiaxi, Lu, Biographies.Google Scholar

63. The years varied from country to country; for example, the United States and Canada, 1850–1953; Japan, 1901–39; Britain, 1911–49; France, Germany and other Western countries, 1907–62; the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries, 1950–62. Cheng, Chu-yuan, Scientific and Engineering Manpower in Communist China, 1949–1963 (Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 1965), pp. 123, 199 and 223.Google Scholar

64. “1900–1952 Nian Zhongguo chuncui wulixue he yingyong wulixue boshi xuewei lunwenlu” (“A list of Chinese doctoral theses on pure physics and applied physics from 1900 to 1952”), in Nianzu, Dai (ed.), Ershi shiji shangbanye Zhongguo wulixue lunwen jicui (A Source Book of Chinese Physicists' Papers in the First Half of the 20th Century) (Changsha: Hunan jiaoyu chubanshe, 1993), pp. 12131252.Google Scholar

65. In 1900, the allied army of eight imperialist powers, which occupied Beijing after putting down the Boxer Rebellion (yihetuan qiyi), forced the Qing government to sign a treaty which requested China pay these countries a huge sum of indemnity. Later, the American government considered that the indemnity it received exceeded its loss during the war so that it decided to use US$ 11 million, part of the indemnity, to train Chinese students. This included establishing a preparatory school for studying abroad, the forerunner of Qinghua University, and supporting Chinese students to pursue studies in the United States. About 3–4,000 Chinese studied under the Boxer Indemnity Scholarship Program. Dachun, Liu and Xianghong, Wu, Xinxue ku lu (An Arduous Journey for the New Science–Among Science, Society and Culture) (Nanchang: Jiangxi daxue chubanshe, 1995), pp. 209213.Google Scholar Britain had a similar programme.

66. Schnepp, Otto, “The impact of returning scholars on Chinese science and technology,” in Simon, Denis Fred and Goldman, Merle (eds.), Science and Technology in Post-Mao China (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 175195.Google Scholar

67. The number is calculated from a table of the number of Chinese students who did postgraduate study. Between 1949 and 1965, 16,397 Chinese students finished graduate training, among whom 6,454, or about 40%, were in the fields of science, engineering, agronomy and medical science. The table does not collapse the total numbers across fields from 1966 to 1969, but only gives an aggregate number year by year, which amounts to 4,546. If one assumes, similarly, that 40% of them majored in science and related disciplines, the number is 1,818. A number of 8,272 is thus obtained. 1949–1981 Nian Zhongguo jiaoyu nianjian bianjibu (Editorial Board of China's Education Yearbook 1949–1981) (ed.), Zhongguo jiaoyu nianjian 1949–1981 (China's Education Yearbook 1949–1981) (Beijing: Zhongguo dabaike quanshu chubanshe, 1984), p. 964.Google Scholar

68. Li, and White, , “The army in the succession to Deng Xiaoping,” p. 766.Google Scholar

69. Xie, Yu, “The social origins of scientists in different fields,” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 11 (1992), p. 273.Google Scholar

70. Zuckerman, , Scientific Elite, pp. 6368.Google Scholar

71. Crosland, , Science under Control, pp. 176179.Google Scholar

72. Corner, Walter D., Socialism, Politics, and Equality: Hierarchy and Change in Eastern Europe and the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979), pp. 133142Google Scholar; Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., “The attainment of occupational status: a model with multiple indicator constructs,” in Slomczynski, Kazimierz M. and Kranze, Tadeasz K. (eds.), Social Stratification in Poland: Eight Empirical Studies (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1988), pp. 78104Google Scholar; Heyns, Barbara and Bialecki, Ireneusz, “Educational inequalities in post-war Poland,” in Shavit, Yossi and Blossfeld, Hans-Peter (eds.), Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries (Boulder: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 307335Google Scholar; Wong, Raymond Sin-kwok, “Multidimensional influences of family environment in education: The case of socialist Czechoslovakia,” Sociology of Education, Vol. 71, No. 1 (1998), pp. 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73. Vucinich, Alexander, The Soviet Academy of Sciences (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1956), pp. 99103.Google Scholar

74. Li, Cheng, “University networks and the rise of Qinghua graduates in China's leadership,” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, No. 32 (1994), pp. 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

75. Ben-David, Joseph, “Universities and academic systems in modern societies,” in Ben-David, Joseph (ed. Gad Freudenthal), Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), p. 127.Google Scholar

76. Brubacher, John S. and Rudy, Willis, Higher Education in Transition: A History of American Collegesand Universities, 1636–1976 (New York: Harper & Row, third ed., revised and enlarged, 1976), p. 175.Google Scholar

77. Zuckerman, , Scientific Elite, pp. 8295.Google Scholar

78. Cole, Jonathan R. and Cole, Stephen, Social Stratification in Science (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973), p. 72.Google Scholar

79. Of course, social origins alone could not warrant elite membership for a Chinese scientist. Scholarship, research productivity and the recognition from the scientific community, as well as other factors, such as political background, characteristics of the field in which a scientist works, personal relationship (guanxi), may also affect the outcome of the elite membership election. For a discussion of the factors, including guanxi – mentor-student ties, colleague ties – affecting the CAS membership elections, see Cao, Cong, “The Chinese Academy of Sciences: the election of scientists into the elite group,” Minerva, Vol. 36, No. 4 (1998), pp. 323346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar