Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:20:26.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Place of Chinese Disunity in Japanese Army Strategy during 1931

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Donald A. Jordan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aggressive action of Japan's Kwantung Army in 1931 is widely known. Its armed takeover of most of Manchuria from a conglomeration of Chinese forces which greatly outnumbered the Japanese, points to a weakness in China's defences other than that of numbers. None of the various Chinese armies was as modern in firepower or as well supplied logistically as Japan's crack army in Manchuria. The disarray within the Chinese Government of Nanjing (Nanking) that was obvious in mid 1931 also tempted the adventurous field officers of the Kwantung Army (KA). These veteran officers with years of duty in China, decided, from their reading of the situation in China as well as in Japan and the West, to act on 18 September 1931 rather than make further preparations as recommended in Tokyo.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 109 , March 1987 , pp. 42 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Craig, Albert M. and Reischauer, Edwin O., East Asia (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1973), p. 707Google Scholar. Ben-Ami, Shillony, Revolt in Japan (Princeton: Princeton U. Press, 1973), p. 3Google Scholar. Mark, Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji and Japan's Confrontation with the West (Princeton: Princeton U. Press, 1975), pp. 114–15.Google Scholar

2. Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji, pp. 89–90, 96, 156–57, 160. Shillony, Revolt in Japan, p. 3. ChalmersJohnson, Johnson, “How China and Japan see each other” in Coox, A. D. and Conroy, H. (eds.), China and Japan: A Search for Balance Since World War I (Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio, Inc., 1978), p. 9Google Scholar. Ogata, Sadako, Defiance in Manchuria (Berkeley: U. of California Press, 1964), pp. 2089Google Scholar. Yoshihashi, Takehiko, Conspiracy at Mukden (New Haven: Yale U. Press, 1963).Google Scholar

3. Lai Tse-han, “The origins and development of the Canton separatist movement of 1931,” an unpublished manuscript which provided a wealth of detail on the factional struggle.

4. Ogata, Defiance, Chs. Ill and IV. Baron Harada, Kumao, Saionji-Harada Memoirs (Washington, D.C.: University Publications of America), reel No. 1 and the diary of Marquis Kido in Pritchard, R. John and Zaide, Sonia M. (eds.),Tokyo War Crimes Trial (New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1981), Vol. 1, pp. 1927 –28. Hereafter cited as TWCT.Google Scholar

5. Jones, F. C., Manchuria Since 1931 (London: Oxford U. Press, 1949). p. 5.Google Scholar

6. Shen, Yi-yun, Yi-yun-hui-i (Memoirs of Mme. Huang Fu) (Taibei: Zhuanji Wenxue, 1971), pp. 431–32; based on Huang's diary.Google Scholar

7. Ogata, Defiance, p. 54.

8. Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji, pp. 114–15, cites Seki Hiroharu. See this source translated in part by Jansen, Marius B. as “Manchurian incident 1931,” Ch. II, in Morley, James W. (ed.), Japan Erupts (New York: Columbia U. Press, 1984), pp. 170–77.Google Scholar

9. Akira, Iriye, After Imperialism: The Search for a New Order in the Far East, 1921-1931 (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard U. Press, 1965), pp. 287–88.Google Scholar

10. Japan Advertiser, 1 July 1931, p. 1 headlines. Hereafter cited as JA.

11. Iriye, After Imperialism, p. 289.

12. JA, 10 July 1931, p. 4, editorial by S. Washio. Mainichi, 11 June 1931, p. 1. Gongnong tongxin zhi (Shanghai: CCP, 18 July 1931), p. 156. North China Herald (Shanghai: 7 July 1931), p. 3, hereafter cited as NCH.

13. Mainichi, 12 June 1931, p. 1, from their Canton correspondent. Report of 27 July 1931 from U.S. Consul Ballantine at Canton to the Dept. of State, U.S. Dept. of State 793.94/1789 (hereafter cited as USDOS).

14. Ogata, Defiance, pp. 47, 49, 53–55, which cites an army report, “General principles concerning the settlement of Manchurian and Mongolian problems”; also cited by Furuya, Keiji, Chiang Kai-shek, His Life and Times (New York: St John's U. Press, 1981), p. 309. Seki, “Manshu jihen,” p. 422, cites the Katakura diary from the KA staff.Google Scholar

15. Mainichi, 13 June 1931, p. 1, from Changchun.

16. British Foreign Office, Japan: Correspondence F/4548/3792/23, Tokyo to Henderson, 16 July 1931.

17. British Military Attaché G. Badham-Thornhill to Minister Lampson in Beijing, 26 June 1931, Documents of British Foreign Policy (hereafter cited as DOBFP), 2nd Series, Vol. VIII, No. 491.

18. Seki as translated by Jansen in “Manchurian incident,” p. 178.

19. Saionji-Harada Memoirs, Vol. I, p. 42, where Prime Minister Wakatsuki told Harada of Doihara's aid to General Shi Yousan. Testimony of Doihara in TWCT, Vol. I, pp. 15, 725. Seki, “Manshu jihen” Crowley, James B., Japan's Quest for Autonomy, National Security and Foreign Policy, 1930-1938 (Princeton: Princeton U. Press, 1966), p. 96 based on interviews of Japanese generals.Google Scholar

20. Zhongyang zhoubao (Nanjing: weekly for KMT members only, 3 August 1931), p. 29. “Zhunfa Zhanzheng,” Gongnong tongxin zhi (March 1932).

21. TWCT, Vol. V, Personnel Record VII, p. 15, 725, testimony of Doihara. Seki, “Manshu jihen.”

22. Saionji-Harada Memoirs, p. 42.

23. Hata, Ikuhiko, Shōwa shi no gunjin tachi (Collected Short Biographies of Twentysix Showa Military Figures) (Tokyo: Bungeishunju-sha, 1982), pp. 89–101.Google Scholar

24. Crowley, Japan's Quest, p. 114 and Ch. 11. Ogata, Defiance, pp. 13–15. Leonard A. Humphreys, “The Futabakai/Issekikai: the army's dissident staff officers of the 1920's,” a paper presented at the AAS Conference in Toronto, 19 March 1976. International Military Tribunal Far East (IMTFE), Doc. 2905, Evidentiary Doc. 2773.

25. Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji, pp. 95, 162–63.

26. Hata, Shōwa shi no gunjin tachi (biography of Tanaka). Yi-yun, Yi-yun-hui-i, pp. 431–34, based on the diary of Huang Fu, which states that Tanaka accompanied Doihara in visiting him.

27. Diary of Chiang Kai-shek for 10 July 1931, KMT Party archives at Yangmingshan, Taibei. Hereafter cited as Chiang Diary. Guowen zhoubao, 3 August 1931, with Chiang's telegram warning against distractions during the Jiangxi Anti-Communist campaign.

28. Chiang Diary for 1 September 1931.

29. Interview with George Yeh, longtime diplomat of the Nationalist Government, inTaibei, 3 October 1979.

30. Nichi nichi, 17 July 1931.

31. Gaiko jiho (Tokyo: 1 September, 1931), No. 642, a journal devoted to international relations.

32. Asahi, 28 July 1931, p. 1.

33. South China Morning Post (14 July 1931); hereafter cited as SCMP. NCH (14 July 1931), p. 40, covered the attack of Sun Fo against Nanjing. DOBFP, Vol. IX, No. 90, reported on the efforts of Eugene Chen at Tokyo to discredit the Nanjing regime. Iriye, After Imperialism, p. 289.

34. Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji, pp. 114–15, 135–36, 156–57, 160, which integrates the work of Seki and Ogata.

35. The Diary of Marquis Kido, 1931–45 (Frederick, Md: University Publications of America, 1984), pp. 3–4, entries for 10 September.

36. Zhongyang zhoubao (21 September 1931), p. 21.

37. NCH, 15 September 1931, p. 363; and on 22 September 1931.

38. NCH (8 September 1931), p. 826. Zhongyang zhoubao (7 September 1931), p. 23.

39. NCH. 15 September 1931, p. 363, and 22 September 1931, p. 400.

40. JA, 11 September 1931, p. 2, via Nippon Dempo correspondents at Nanjing and Shanghai.

41. SCMP, 14 September 1931, p. 12, from correspondent in Canton.

42. Canton Post, Report 45 (893.00), from the U.S. Consul at Canton to the Secretary of State describing military movements of Canton's forces from 16–18 September 1931.

43. Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji, pp. 114–15

44. Chiang Diary, entry for 19 September 1931.

45. Shillony, Revolt in Japan, p. 3.

46. Report on the anti-Chiang movement by the U.S. Consul General at Nanjing, 22 September 1931, USDOS 783.94/1913. SCMP (25 September 1931), datelined Canton 24 September, with Wang's speech. The slogan alleged to be from 1931 was revealed at a symposium convened by the Party history committee in Taibei on 12 May 1980 to discuss the background of the Shanghai incident of 1932 but was not supported by documentation.

47. “On the Japanese imperialists' violent occupation of Manchuria” by Mao as director of the Red Army General Political Department, Mao Zedong ji (Beijing: 1970), Vol. III, pp. 13–15.

48. Canton Gazette and Daily Sun, with the official circular telegram from the Canton Government demanding Chiang's resignation, USDOS 793.94/1866, via the U.S. Consulate at Canton, between 18 and 24 September 1931.

49. Nathan, Andrew J., “A factionalism model for CCP politics,” The China Quarterly, Vol. 53, (01/03 1973), p. 50, which was also based on conflict within the early Beijing Government.Google Scholar

50. Ogata, Defiance, p. 64.

51. Ibid. pp. 71, 72. Basset, R., Democracy and Foreign Policy (London: Longmans, 1952), pp. 31, 38.Google Scholar

52. NCH (20 October 1931), p. 88 from correspondent in Canton, 7 October 1931.

53. USDOS 793.94/2563, 15 October report by U.S. Consul General J. W. Ballantine. Also in British Consul Phillips's report of 11 October 1931 to Minister Lampson in Beijing; DOBFP, Vol. VIII, No. 613. NCH, 3 November 1931, p. 13, and 13 October 1931, p. 13.

54. USDOS 793.94/2562 report dated 12 October 1931 from Consul General J. W. Ballantine. NCH, Ibid.

55. Summary of Chen's discussion as told to British diplomat Ingram Peck; DOBFP, Vol. IX, No. 90, enclosure No. 1.

56. SCMP, 29 September 1931, p. 12, quotes from the Canton Gazette, 28 September.

57. Xinwen bao, 7 October 1931, p. 8.

58. Hata Ikuhiko, Shōwa shi no gunjin tachi, pp. 89–101. TWCT, Vol. I, pp. 1900–2000, 2002, 2015, 2095. Yoshihashi, Conspiracy at Mukden, p. 48. Ogata, Defiance p. 59 and footnote 26. Tanaka Ryukichi, “Shanhai jihen wa Koshite okosareta,” Bessatsu Chisei, Vol. V (December 1956), pp. 181–86. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities, 1931–1932,” Japan Erupts, p. 296, 307 (from the 1962 version). Furuya, Chiang Kai-shek, p. 349. This connection is accepted both in Taibei and by scholars at the Contemporary History Research Office at the Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing according to an interview there with Li Xin in 1984.

59. NCH (27 October 1931), p. 119, interview with NCH reporter upon arrival at dockside.

60. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities,” p. 288.

61. Ibid. p. 120. NCH (27 October 1931), p. 119.

62. USDOS 793.94/2397 from Shanghai. Canton Post Report 46 by Consul Ballantine, 2 November 1931.

63. USDOS 893.00, Shanghai Post Report 41 and Canton P. R. 47. NCH, 3 November 1931, p. 153, and 26 January 1932, with Chen's letter of resignation.

64. NCH (3 November 1931), p. 154.

65. Daily reports from 8–16 November 1931 in Man Mitsu (Secret Diary of Manchuria), Vol. II, pp. 1, 2; evidence used at the trial of Doihara in IMTFE materials, IPS case 48–110, U.S. National Archives, Military Records Division. Also the report from Japanese Consul at Tianjin, Kuwashima Kazue to Shidehara, TWCT, pp. 4,394–97. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities,” pp. 290–91.

66. Lai Tse-han, “The origins and development of the Canton separatist movement,” pp. 147–48, 152. SCMP, 26 November and 2 December 1931, from Canton. U.S. Consul, Canton Post Report 47, 3 December 1931, 893.00.

67. NCH (8 December 1931), p. 334. Testimony of Chief of Military Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of War, Koiso Kuniaki, TWCT, Vol. XIII, pp. 32, 218–21.

68. Telegram of 26 November from Japanese diplomat Yano at Beiping to Shidehara included in TWCT, Vol. II, p. 4401, exhibit 303. Testimony of Koiso Kuniaki, Chief of Military Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of Army, Vol. XIII, pp. 32, 218–21, ibid. Report of U.S. Consul General in Mukden to Washington, 27 November 1931, USDOS 793.94/2634, relating the large-scale movement of troops and firepower by train from Mukden towards Zhinzhou.

69. Ogata, Defiance, p. 114, cites the Katakura diary from the Mukden HQ which disclaims Doihara's role in initiating the 2nd Tianjin incident. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities,” pp. 290–95 reveals that the Tianjin garrison commander acted on his own.

70. Testimony of Minami and then Prime Minister Wakatsuki on the orders to pull back, TWCT, Vol. I, pp. 1568–69, 19786–87, 19835. Ogata, Loc. cit.

71. Guowen zhoubao, 14 December 1931. NCH (8 December 1931), p. 332, via UP correspondent at Nanjing.

72. Report of 10 December 1931 by Japanese Naval Attaché Kitaoka at Shanghai, telegram No. 212, Naval Archives R27 (F 36774), Kobun biko bikogaiji, 1931; again in his telegram No. 216 # 1 on 11 December 1931. Report from U.S. Vice Consul Wailes at Nanjing, 24 December 1931, “Student activities from 18 September to 24 December,” USDOS 793.94/3810. Report from British Minister M. Lampson at Beijing. 16 January 1932 to Foreign Office, DOBFP 2nd Series, Vol. IX, No. 89. Enclosure No. 1 by SHS, 25 January 1932, to British Minister M. Lampson at Beijing, in Lampson report to Sir Victor Wellesley of Foreign Office, DOBFP, Vol. IX, No. 121. These observations by foreign intelligence are supported by interviews with Chinese participants in the student movements of Shanghai in late 1931; Dao Baiquan and Mo Xuanyuan, in Taibei in 1980.

73. JA, 16 December 1931, p. 1, from Nanjing, Mainichi, 12 December 1931, p. 1, from Nanjing. NCH (22 December 1931), p. 404, datelined Nanjing 15 December. USDOS 793.94/s3810, from Nanjing dated 24 December 1931.

74. NCH (29 December 1931), p. 441. China Weekly Review (29 December 1931), p. 113. Ma Chaojun, member of the Canton faction, interviewed in Taibei in 1966, who became mayor of Nanjing as a result of the Cantonese victory; author of Zhongguo Laogong yundong shi (Taibei: Laogong fuli, 1959), Vol. Ill, pp. 1056–59. Parks, Coble has included this struggle in The Shanghai Capitalists and the National Government, 1927-37 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U. Press, 1980), pp. 97, 98.Google Scholar

75. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities,” p. 296–98. Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji, p. 156, cites from Ishiwara.

76. Testimony of Araki Sadao in TWCT, Vol. XII, pp. 28305–308; Vol. VII, p. 15843. The approval of the funds for the consolidation of control in Manchuria gave tacit support to both the Zhinzhou and N. Manchurian campaigns.

77. NCH (29 December 1931) datelined Mukden on 22 December. Araki testimony TWCT, Vol. VII, pp. 15, 843, prosecution doc. 2220. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities,” p. 299 cites the Katakura diary from a KA officer.

78. Peattie, Ishiwara Kanji, p. 136.

79. Guowen zhoubao, 1 January 1932. The observations of Huang, Fu, a participant, are recorded in his diary Huang yingbai xiansheng nianpu changbien, Shen, Yunlong (ed.) (Taibei: Lianjing, 1976), p. 462.Google Scholar

80. NCH (29 December 1931), p. 348, via Guomin news agency.

81. Chen's explanation to British Consuls Ingram and Peck at Nanjing on 9 January 1932; DOBFP IX, No. 90–91, 10 January 1932. Guowen zhoubao, 21 December 1931. NCH (22 December 1931), p. 403, datelined Nanjing 16 December.

82. SCMP, 28 December 1931, p. 14.

83. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities,” p. 301, apparently cites the Katakura diary.

84. Mainichi, 1 January 1932, p. 1, special from Nanjing. Report to London by the British Minister in Beijing, M. Lampson, 16 January 1932: DOBFP 2nd series, Vol. IX, No. 89.

85. U.S. Military Attaché Tenney's analysis from Beijing, 30 December 1931, USDOS 793.94/3448. Shimada, “The extension of hostilities,” p. 302, where he questions why Zhang abandoned Zhinzhou “at the last minute.”

86. Interview by U.S. Consul General W. Peck with government representatives and W. H. Donald, chief adviser to Zhang Xueliang at Nanjing 22 December 1931, USDOS 793.94/3588.

87. From Itagaki's “Josei handan” (“Situational analysis”), early 1932, cited by Ogata, Defiance, pp. 169–70.