Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:39:57.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Making Heritage in Hong Kong: A Case Study of the Central Police Station Compound*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2010

Abstract

This article is a case study of state–society–capital conflicts over the preservation of the Central Police Station (CPS) compound in Hong Kong during 2003–08. The conflict was between two fundamentally different approaches to urban space: a cultural economy approach that took culture and space as a source of economic profit, and an opposition discourse of preservation that emphasized cultural, historical and humanistic values as an end. The struggle turned out to be a moderate success for anti-commercialism. Drawing on and extending the notions of collective memory and spatial politics, this article examines how the various civil society actors, in their struggle against commercialism, sought to define and enhance the cultural value of the site through a variety of discourses and practices relating to history and space. It addresses the specific question of why and how certain constructions of collective memory succeed (or fail) to work with certain places in particular instances. The study shows that memories of the CPS compound contained both state-associated and people-associated accounts, between which the former prevailed. The state-associated account was embedded in a familiar, hegemonic story about Hong Kong, which, via an abstract process of symbolization around the notion of the rule of law, successfully turned the compound into an iconic symbol of identification for the city. Beyond this, the civil society actors sought also to generate a sense of lived space associated with the people, and the outcome was mixed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Halbwach, Maurice (trans. , F.J. and Ditter, V.Y.), The Collective Memory (New York: Harper Colophon, 1980[1950])Google Scholar; Casey, Edward, Remembering: A Phenomenological Study (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Gillis, John (ed.), Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton, 1994)Google Scholar; Olick, Jeffrey K. and Levy, Daniel, “Collective memory and cultural constraints: holocaust myth and rationality in German politics,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 62, No. 6 (1997), pp. 921–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schwartz, Barry, “Memory as a cultural system: Abraham Lincoln in World War II,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 5 (1996), pp. 908–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schwartz, Barry and Schuman, Howard, “History, commemoration, and belief: Abraham Lincoln in American memory, 1945–2001,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 70, No. 2 (2005), pp. 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Harvey, David, The Condition of Postmodernity, Part III (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar; Lefebvre, Henri (trans. Nicholson-Smith, D.), Production of Space (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991)Google Scholar; Massey, Doreen, “Politics and space/time,” in Keith, Michael and Pile, Steve (eds.), Place and the Politics of Identity (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 141–61Google Scholar; Miller, Vincent, “Intertextuality, the referential illusion and the production of a gay ghetto,” Social and Cultural Geography Vol. 6, No. 1 (2005), pp. 6179CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Soja, Edward W., Postmodern Geographies: the Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (London: Verso, 1989)Google Scholar.

3 Jenlink, Patrick M., “Creating public spaces and practiced places for democracy, discourse, and the emergence of civil society,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 20, No. 5 (2007), pp. 429–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lugosi, Peter, “Queer consumption and commercial hospitality: communitas, myths and the production of liminoid space,” The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 27, Nos. 3/4 (2007), pp. 163–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Massey, “Politics and space/time,” pp. 141–61; Stillerman, Joel, “The politics of space and culture in Santiago: Chile's street markets,” Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 4 (2006), pp. 507–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Lefebvre, Production of Space.

5 Jessop, Bob, “Liberalism, neoliberalism and urban governance: a state-theoretical perspective,” Antipode, Vol. 34 (2002), pp. 452–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jessop, Bob, The Future of the Capitalist State (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Urry, John, Consuming Places (London: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar.

6 Cuthbert, Alexander R., “Preservation and capital accumulation in Hong Kong,” Third World Planning Review, Vol. 6 (1984), pp. 95115CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Lee Chi-miu, “In-between tourism and heritage preservation: the construction of cultural identity under colonialism and Orientalism,” MPhil thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002.

8 Abbas, Ackbar, Hong Kong: Culture and the Politics of Disappearance (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

9 Chan Chit-kwai Stephen, SCMP, 13 August 2004.

10 It was the second time that the Hong Kong Institute of Architects and the Conservancy Association, represented by Bernard Wan-fung Lin and Albert Kwok-tak Lai respectively, had co-operated over preservation issues since the campaign to protect the Victoria Harbour a few years before.

11 See Law, Hing-hung, Ta kung pao, 25 July 2006Google Scholar.

12 Kin-hung, Lau, Hong Kong Economic Times, 26 January 2005Google Scholar.

13 Editor, Hong Kong Economic Times, 30 April 2003, author's translation.

14 Yiu-seng, Ho, Jiti huiyi zhi zhongqu jingshu: bainian jingshu de gushi (Collective Memory of the Central Police Station – the Story of the 100-Year-Old Police Station) (Hong Kong: Ming Pao Publishing, 2005), p. ivGoogle Scholar, author's translation.

15 Chi-kong, Cheung, Oriental Daily, 20 October 2007Google Scholar, author's translation.

16 The meaning of law remains ambiguous in public discourse, for in Chinese, the notion of fazhi may underpin a rights-based conception of “rule of law” within the British common law tradition, and it may also mean “law and order” in a more general sense that stresses “rule according to the law.” See Ku, Agnes S., “Negotiating law, rights, and civil autonomy: from the colonial to the post-colonial regimes,” in Ku, Agnes S. and Pun, Ngai (eds.), Remaking Citizenship in Hong Kong: Community, Nation and the Global City (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 157–74Google Scholar.

17 Chun-tong, Yeung, Economic Journal, 8 November 2004Google Scholar, author's translation.

18 Ku and Ngai Pun, Remaking Citizenship in Hong Kong; Sang, Law Wing (ed.), Shui de chengshi? Zhan hou Xianggang de gongmin wenhua yu zhengzhi lunshu (Whose City? Civic Culture and Political Discourses in Post-War Hong Kong) (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Wing, Ngo Tak (ed.), Hong Kong's History – State and Society under Colonial Rule (London: Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar; Pun, Ngai and Yee, Lai Man (eds.), Shu xie cheng shi: Xianggang de shen fen yu wen hua (Narrating Hong Kong Culture and Identity) (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

19 Christopher Munn, “The criminal trial under early colonial rule,” in Ngo Tak Wing, Hong Kong's History, pp. 46–73.

20 Munn, “The Criminal Trial,” p. 68.

21 Ibid. p. 67.

22 Schwartz, “Memory as a cultural system,” and “History, commemoration, and belief.”

23 Olick and Levy, “Collective memory and cultural constraints.”

24 Ku, Agnes S., “Hegemonic construction, negotiation and displacement – struggle over right of abode in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2001), pp. 259–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Hook, Brian and Neves, Miguel Santos, “The role of Hong Kong and Macau in China's relations with Europe,” The China Quarterly, No. 169 (2002), pp. 108–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ku, Agnes, “Negotiating the space of civil autonomy in Hong Kong – power, discourses and dramaturgical representations,” The China Quarterly, No. 179 (2004), pp. 647–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Ku, “Hegemonic construction, negotiation and displacement,” and “Negotiating the space of civil autonomy.”

27 Yi, Li, Apple Daily, 28 January 2005Google Scholar, author's translation.

28 Li Yi started up the magazine “The Seventies” (later changed to “The Nineties”) and wrote extensively on China's political and economic issues in the local press. He once openly confessed that he became disillusioned with the Chinese regime after the downfall of the Gang of Four.

29 Ho Yiu-seng, Collective Memory of the Central Police Station, p. ii, author's translation.

30 Yee-tuen, Mok, Ming pao, 30 June 2006Google Scholar, author's translation.

31 Fong Yuen, Ta kung pao, 12 September 2005, author's translation.

32 A number of names, ranging from senior officers to office assistants, appeared in the press recounting these stories, including Ho Ming-sen, Cheung Fook-shing and Lee Siu-on. See Sing Tao Daily, 31 January 2005 and Ming pao, 31 January 2005.

33 Yu Fong-yee, Ming pao, 7 October 2004.

34 SCMP, 23 October 2004.

35 SCMP, 6 January 2007.

36 The compound was first opened on three successive weekends in January 2005. Following popular demand in 2006, it hosted six open days on three consecutive weekends again in January 2007.

37 The architects were Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron, whose other works include the “bird's nest” Beijing National Stadium for the 2008 Olympic Games and London's Tate Museum.

38 Munn, “The criminal trial,” p. 68.