Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T02:42:10.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fascism and Modern China: A Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wo-men te hsün-lien (n.p., 1936), pp. 23–31. I am indebted to Dr Marvin Williamson for informing me of this important and rare work.

2. Chang also maintains that racism was an essential ingredient of fascism, and that, because the Blue Shirts did not propound concepts of racial superiority, it is ludicrous to suggest that they were fascist. Significantly, however, Mussolini rejected race as a defining characteristic of the state and nation, adding that “Race; it is an emotion, not a reality; 95% of it is emotion.” Oakeshott, Michael (ed.), The Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939), p. 167Google Scholar.

3. Ibid. p. 175.

4. The name Blue Shirts is used largely for convenience sake. In The Abortive Revolution, I described the organization and its several names in some detail. The description there, in all but a couple of small details, is fully corroborated in Wo-men te hsün-lien, pp. 39–41; and Wen-i, Teng, Mao-hsien fan-nan chi (A Record of Braving Dangers and Withstanding Difficulties) (Taipei: Tai-wan hsüeh-sheng shu-chü, 1973), Vol. IGoogle Scholar: 148. Professor Winston Hsieh kindly directed my attention to Teng's memoir.