Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-mktnf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-03T21:35:24.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chinese Education in South-East Asia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Extract

This article surveys the development of Chinese education within South-East Asian Chinese societies, and briefly relates it to the integration and assimilation of the hua ch'iao into indigenous societies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Mandarin term for “Chinese abroad.”Google Scholar

2 The term “Nanyang” here is used synonomously with “Southeast Asia.”Google Scholar

3 Virtually all Nanyang Chinese are of South China origin: Cantonese, Fukkienese, Teochiu, Hakka, and Hainanese. These “ speech group” distinctions are also primary determinants of Chinese social organisation in South-East Asia.Google Scholar

4 The ban on newspapers now has been relaxed, although with no significant increase in the number of publications.Google Scholar

5 Skinner, G. W., “The Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia,” Annals of the American Academy of the Arts and Sciences, January 1959, p. 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Ibid., p. 137.

7 Skinner, G. W., Chinese Society in Thailand (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1957), p. 381.Google Scholar

8 Purcell, V., The Chinese in Southeast Asia (London: Oxford University Press, 1951), p. 432.Google Scholar

9 Coughlin, R. J., Double Identity: The Chinese in Modern Thailand (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1960), p. 148.Google Scholar

10 Skinner, G. W., Chinese Society in Thailand, op. cit., p. 227. All statistics and most general information pertaining to Thailand up to 1955 are taken from this study.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., p. 285.

12, 13 1958 figures are taken from: R. J. Coughlin, op. cit., p. 151.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 153.

15 Skinner, G. W., “The Chinese Minority,” in Indonesia, edited by Ruth, McVey (New Haven: Human Relations Area Files, 1963), p. 111.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 112.

17 Skinner, G. W., Chinese Society in Thailand, op. cit., p. 227.Google Scholar

18 R. van Diffelin, quoted in V. Purcell, op. cit., p. 531. By 1937, over 30,000 were enrolled in 106 Dutch-Chinese schools. See Hutasoit, M., Compulsory Education in Indonesia (UNESCO, 1954), p. 80.Google Scholar

19 Finkelstein, L. S., “Education in Indonesia,” Far Eastern Survey, August 22, 1951;CrossRefGoogle Scholar quoted in Thompson, V. and Adloff, R., Minority Problems in Southeast Asia (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1955), p. 52.Google Scholar

20 Hutasoit, M., Compulsory Education in Indonesia (UNESCO, 1954), p. 81.Google Scholar

22 Skinner, G. W., “The Chinese of Java,” in Colloquium on Overseas Chinese, edited by Fried, M. H. (Institute of Pacific Relations, 1958), p. 4.Google Scholar

23 Union Research Service, Hong Kong, December 4, 1959, p. 268.Google Scholar

24 Ibid., December 1, 1959, p. 258. The claim undoubtedly is exaggerated.

25 Williams, L., “Sino-Indonesian Diplomacy: a Study of Revolutionary International Politics,” The China Quarterly, No. 11, p. 192.Google Scholar

26 Union Research Service, December 4, 1959, op. cit.Google Scholar

27 Information was provided in private correspondence by Miss Mary Somers of Cornell University.Google Scholar

28 G. W. Skinner, “The Chinese Minority,” op. cit., p. 114.Google Scholar

30 Annual Report on Public Instruction in Burma, 1935–36, quoted by Purcell, V., op. cit., p. 95.Google Scholar

31 V. Purcell, op. cit., p. 95.Google Scholar

32 V. Thompson and R. Adloff, op. cit., p. 56.Google Scholar

33 Directory, Chinese Schools in Burma, compiled by Chan, K. G. (Rangoon: December 1962). All 1959 and 1962 data are from this source.Google Scholar

34 Elegant, R., The Dragon's Seed (London: St. Martin's Press, 1959), p. 254.Google Scholar

35 Directory, Chinese Schools in Burma, op. cit., p. 1.Google Scholar

37 Information on Chinese education in Laos and Cambodia was generously provided in private correspondence by two gentlemen to whom I am greatly indebted: data on Cambodia is from William Willmott, London School of Economics, who recently completed a year of field research on Chinese communities there; data on Laos for both 1959 and 1963 is from John T. S. Chen, of Hong Kong, who lived in Laos for several years.Google Scholar

38 South China Morning Post (Hong Kong), October 2, 1962.Google Scholar

39 Hong Kong Tiger Standard, October 11, 1962.Google Scholar

40 l'Annuaire Statistique Retrospectif du Cambodge (1937–1957) (Phnom Penh: Ministère du Plan, 1958), p. 24.Google ScholarAn unofficial source put 1952 enrolment around 15,000. Steinberg, D. J., Cambodia: its People, its Society, its Culture (New Haven: Human Relations Area File, 1959), p. 256.Google Scholar

41 Government statistics provided by William Willmott, unless otherwise noted.Google Scholar

42 Ly, Y-ming, “The Chinese in Vietnam,” Viet-My (Saigon: The Vietnamese-American Association), V, No. 3, 1960.Google Scholar

43 Skinner, G. W., Report on the Chinese in Southeast Asia (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1950), reported in Thompson and Adloff, op. cit., p. 58.Google Scholar

44 Ly, op. cit.Google Scholar

45 News From Vietnam (Embassy of the Republic of Vietnam, Washington, D.C.), VI, 1960.Google Scholar

46 Free China Review (Taipei), August 1963, p. 66.Google Scholar

47 Hildreth, E. E., “The Challenge in Education,” in Vietnam: the First Five Years (Ann Arbor: Michigan State University Press, 1959), p. 155.Google Scholar

48 News From Vietnam, op. cit., IV, No. 20, 1958.Google Scholar

49 Pike, Edgar N., “Public and Private Education in Vietnam,” Asian Culture (Saigon), April-June 1960, p. 4.Google Scholar

50 Ly, op. cit.Google Scholar

51 Hong Kong Tiger Standard, March 12, 1962.Google Scholar

52 Taiwan Jong-yang Jih-pao, March 7, 1961. This report put the number of primary schools between 135–140, joint primary-secondary at 14, and secondary at 2.Google Scholar

53 Free China Review (Taipei), September 1963, p. 63. All 1963 figures are from this source.Google Scholar

54 “Elementary and Secondary Curricula in Chinese Schools,” Circular No. 3, s. 1956; (Manila: Department of Education, Bureau of Private Schools, May 16, 1960).Google Scholar

55 Hong Kong Tiger Standard, March 12, 1962.Google Scholar

56 Appleton, S., “Communism and the Chinese in the Philippines,” Pacific Affairs, December 1959, p. 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 Manila Times dispatch, quoted in The Asian Student (San Franciso), May 30, 1964.Google Scholar

58 Comber, L., “Chinese Education: Perennial Malayan Problem,” Asian Survey, October 1961, p. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 The Straits Times, October 25, 1963.Google Scholar

60 For example, in 1962 no separate, full-time Malay-medium secondary schools operated in the Federation, though about 13,200 students attended Malay secondary classes attached to other schools.Google Scholar

61 Ministry of Education Annual Report, 1961 (Singapore: 1962).Google Scholar

62 Government-aided private schools: 241, with 45,450 pupils. Local authority schools: 9, with 1,100 pupils. Church and Mission schools: 10, with 2,600 pupils. Unaided private and estate schools: 5–10, about 1,000 pupils. See Sarawak Annual Report, 1961 (Kuching: 1962).Google Scholar

63 Government-aided private schools: 87, with 21,000 pupils. Government (6), Mission (21), and unaided private and estate schools together enrolled about 4,000. See North Borneo Annual Report, 1961 (Jesselton: 1962).Google Scholar

64 North Borneo Annual Report, 1962 (Jesselton: 1963). Government-aided Chinese private schools enrolled 24,400; total for all Chinese schools is my estimate.Google Scholar

65 Dale, M., “Chinese Education in Malaya,” Far Eastern Economic Review, February 8, 1962.Google Scholar

67 The Observer (London) August 18, 1963.Google Scholar

68 Lu, Yu-sun, Programs of Communist China for Overseas Chinese (Hong Kong: Union Research Institute, 1956). Totals for overseas Chinese students going to the mainland appear to include those from Hong Kong and Macao.Google Scholar

69 Ho, Hsiang-ning, “Rising Patriotism of Overseas Chinese,” speech of July 11, 1957, reported in Current Background, No. 467 (Hong Kong: U.S. Consulate General, 1957).Google Scholar

70 Jack, Chow, “Overseas Students on the Mainland,” Hong Kong Tiger Standard, December 17, 1962.Google Scholar

71 Union Research Service, op. cit., February 15, 1963, p. 214.Google Scholar

72 Ho Hsiang-ning, op. cit.Google Scholar

73 Chow, op. cit.Google Scholar

74 Union Research Service, ibid. p. 215.

75 China Yearbook 1959–60 (Taipei: 1960).Google Scholar

76 China Yearbook 1962–63 (Taipei: 1963), p. 304.Google Scholar

77 Assuming that no more than half those in mainland China were studying below the university level.Google Scholar