No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Statistical Evidence for Yang Ch'eng-wu's Manipulation of the Military Elite
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
Extract
William Parish in “Factions in Chinese Military Politics,” ( The China Quarterly, No. 56, p. 667) argues that military factions only assumed political importance during the Cultural Revolution. Part of this argument is based on the claim that Yang Ch'eng-wu, when acting chief of staff and secretary-general of the Central Committee's Military Affairs Committee, attempted to influence the appointment of PLA cadres to provincial revolutionary committees in favour of the 5th Field Army. This influence, he demonstrates, by considering the distribution of PLA cadres with known Field Army affiliations on two groups of provincial revolutionary committees: those formed before and those formed after 8 March 1968 – the date of Yang's last public appearance. Parish argues that a significantly greater proportion of military cadres with a 5th Field Army background were appointed to those Provincial Revolutionary Committees formed before 8 March 1968, than one would have expected given the distribution of such cadres in military posts in 1966. Since he had previously argued that military appointments before 1967 were made without reference to Field Army affiliations, he concludes that Yang was engaged in factional politics. However, Parish's account of Yang Ch'engwu's activities is very much open to question on the grounds that the available evidence suggests that most military appointments to the leading positions (i.e. chairman or vice-chairman) on Provincial-level Revolutionary Committees were determined well before the formal establishment of these institutions and before Yang's dismissal.
- Type
- Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The China Quarterly 1974
References
1 Peking Review, No. 8 (1967), p. 15.
2 Ibid. No. 7 (1967), p. 14.
3 Ibid. No. 11 (1967), p. 17.
4 Current Scene (Hong Kong), Vol. VI, No. 1 (1968), p. 2; report of Shanghai Radio broadcast.
5 Peking Review, No. 6 (1967), p. 17.
6 Hua-min, Chung, “The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in 1967,” in Communist China 1967 (Hong Kong: Union Research Institute, 1969), p. 17Google Scholar .
7 CCP Documents of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, 1966–1967 (Hong Kong: Union Research Institute, 1968), p. 385Google Scholar ; “Decision concerning the question of Tsinghai.”
8 Ibid. p. 417, “Decision concerning the handling of the Inner Mongolia question.”
9 Current Scene, Vol. VI, No. 21 (1968), p. 8Google Scholar .
10 T'i, Ch'in, “The Government System in Mainland China in 1967,” in Communist China 1967, p. 116Google Scholar .
11 Ibid. p. 117.
12 Current Scene, Vol. VI, No. 9 (1968), p. 9Google Scholar .
13 Ibid. Vol. VI, No. 21 (1968), p. 6.
14 BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. Part III - The Far East (SWB) FE/2579; New China News Agency (NCNA) (Peking), 20 September 1967.
15 CCP Documents, p. 585; “Decision concerning the question of Kwangtung.”
16 SWB, FE/3209.
17 Current Scene, Vol. VI, No. 21 (1968), p. 6Google Scholar .
18 CCP Documents, p. 221; “Decision concerning the recent incidents in Chekiang.”
19 SWB, FE/2576; Changsha Radio.
20 T'i, Ch'in, “The Government System,” p. 119Google Scholar .
21 CCP Documents, p. 395; “Decision concerning the question of Anhwei.”
22 Ibid. p. 434; “Decision concerning the question of Szechuan.”
23 Peking Review, No. 9 (1967), p. 8Google Scholar . This was later described as a “false seizure of power,” and attributed to the “February Adverse Current.”
24 CCP Documents, p. 605; “Decision concerning the question of Kwangsi.
25 Issues and Studies (Taipei), Vol. V, No. 3 (1968), p. 12 – “Tibet Autonomous Region Revolutionary Committee.”Google Scholar