Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T16:14:57.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quarterly Chronicle and Documentation (January–March 1978)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Quarterly Chronicle and Documentation
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The “ten needs and need nots” are: need we or needn't we adhere to the Party's basic line; need we or needn't we have Party leadership; need we or needn't we rely whole-heartedly on the working class; need we or needn't we do well in production; need we or needn't we have rules and regulations; need we or needn't we have socialist accumulation; need we or needn't we apply the principle “from each according to his ability, to each according to his work”; need we or needn't we train the proletariat's own experts; need we or needn't we import new technology; and need we or needn't we stick to planned economy.Google Scholar

2. The “ten should and should nots” are: should we or shouldn't we uphold the absolute leadership of the Party over the army; should we or shouldn't we uphold proletarian Party spirit and oppose bourgeois factionalism; should we or shouldn't we carry on and develop the fine traditions of our Party and our army; should we or shouldn't we consolidate the army; should we or shouldn't we strictly observe revolutionary discipline and abide by rules and regulations; should we or shouldn't we form leading bodies that combine the old, the middle-aged and the young in accordance with the five requirements for revolutionary successors; should we or shouldn't we stress stability in the army; should we or shouldn't we carry out rigorous training and set strict demands; should we or shouldn't we adhere to a system under which our armed forces are a combination of the field armies, the regional forces and the militia; should we or shouldn't we be prepared for war.Google Scholar

3. 3. This refers to equalitarianism and arbitrary requisition of labour power, funds and materials, etc.Google Scholar