Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Rights and realities in the permanency debate

  • Howard Bath (a1)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

References

Hide All
AIHW (2000a) Child protection Australia (Chapter 4, Out-of-home care, pp. 3441). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (web page version).
AIHW (2000b) Adoptions Australia 1998–99. AIHW cat No. CWS 10. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (Child Welfare Series).
Barber, J. (1999) The slow demise of foster care in South Australia. Flinders University of South Australia, School of Social Administration and Social Work
Barth, R., Berry, M., Goodfield, R., & Carson, M. (1987) Older child adoption and disruption, Berkeley, CA: University of California, School of Social Work.
Bath, H. (1998) ‘Trends and issues in the out-of-home care of children in Australia’, International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 98(2), 103114.
Berrick, J., Barth, R. & Needell, B. (1994) ‘A comparison of kinship foster homes and foster family homes: Implications for kinship foster care as family preservation’, Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 81108.
Borland, M., O’Hara, G. & Triseliotis, J. (1991) ‘Placement outcomes for children with special needs’, Adoption and Fostering, 15(2), 1827.
Hollingsworth, L. (2000) ‘Adoption policy in the United States: A word of caution’, Social Work, 45(2), 183186.
Hughes, D. (1997) Facilitating developmental attachment: The road to emotional recovery and behavioural change in foster and adoptive children, Northville, NJ: Jason Aronson.
NYSCCC (2000) Why are post adoption services needed in New York State?. New York State Citizens’ Coalition for Children, Inc. (web site, 2000).
Szwarc, B. (1985). Particular care reconsidered, The follow-up report of the 1979 survey into non-government children’s homes and foster care - 30th June 1984. Cheltenham: The Children’s Bureau of Australia.

Rights and realities in the permanency debate

  • Howard Bath (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed