No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Permanency Planning: a redefinition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2024
Extract
As a practice method, permanency planning has been on the scene long enough to require re-evaluation of its underlying theory and implications for social work. The authors therefore offer a comprehensive definition of permanency planning and describe its major features in detail.
Concern about the phenomenon of drift in foster care has given rise to the practice called permanency planning — the process of taking prompt, decisive action to maintain children in their own homes or place them permanently with other families. This is an important movement in child welfare, and there is a continuing need to clarify its meaning so as to promote its development in theory and practice. Following a brief review of the literature, we therefore propose a comprehensive definition of permanency planning and delineate its major components.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984
Footnotes
This article first appeared in Child Welfare, Volume LXII, Number 3, May/June 1983, and is reprinted with the permission of Child Welfare League of America.
References
1.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie. The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Cutler, Jane Park, and Bateman, Richard W. “Foster Care Case Review: Can It Make A Difference?” Public Welfare
38 (Fall
1980): 46.Google Scholar
3.
Emlen, Arthur; Lahti, Janet; Downs, Glen; McKay, Alec; and Downs, Susan. Overcoming Barriers to Planning for Children in Foster Care. Portland, OR: Regional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland State University, 1977, pp. 10 – 11
Google Scholar
4.
Germain, Carel B., and Gitterman, Alex. The Life Model of Social Work Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
5.
Goldstein, Joseph; Freud, Anna; and Solnit, Albert J.
Behond the Best Interests of the Child. New York: The Free Press, 1973.Google Scholar
6.
Howe, George; Bishop, Gerrie; and Fein, Edith. “Evaluation Report. Social Work Training Program in Permanency Planning.” Year II. Mimeographed. Hartford, CT: Child and Family Services, 1982.Google Scholar
7.
Jones, Martha, and Biesecker, John. Goal Planning in Children and Youth Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1980a. DHHS Publication No. (OHDS) 81 - 30295.Google Scholar
8.
Permanency Planning Guide for Children and Youth Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
1980b. DHHS Publication No. (OHDS) 81 - 30294.Google Scholar
9.
Maluccio, Anthony N. “An Ecological Perspective on Practice with Parents of Children in Foster Care,” in The Challenge of Partnership: Working with Parents of Children in Foster Care, edited by Maluccio, Anthony N. and Sinanoglu, Paula A.. New York: Child Welfare League of America, 1981a, pp. 22 – 35.Google Scholar
10. Maluccio, Anthony N., ed. Promoting Competence — A New/Old Approach to Social Work Practice. New York: The Free Press, 1981b.Google Scholar
11.
Maluccio, Anthony N.; Fein, Edith; Hamilton, V. Jane; Klier, JoLynn; and Ward, Darryl. “Beyond Permanency Planning,” Child Welfare
59 (November 1980).Google ScholarPubMed
12.
Pike, Victor; Downs, Susan; Emlen, Arthur; Downs, Glen; and Case, Denise. Permanent Planning for Children in Foster Care: A Handbook for Social Workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1977. Publication No. (OHDS) 78 – 30124 p. 1.Google Scholar
13.
Stein, Theodore J.; Gambrill, Eileen D.; and Wiltse, Kermit T.
Children in Foster Homes — Achieving Continuity of Care. New York: Praeger Publications
1978.Google Scholar