Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:42:48.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inter-Agency Collaboration: Why is it so difficult? Can we do it better?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Dorothy Scott
Dorothy Scott*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Melbourne, Parkville. 3052
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is based on a presentation at the Mission of St James and St John Forum ‘Protecting Our Children: Where Do We Draw the Line?’ in Melbourne on June 18, 1993. It provides an analysis of why inter-agency collaboration has often remained an elusive goal and identifies some of the structural obstacles to collaboration which are particularly relevant to the current context of child welfare in Victoria. While many of the obstacles to inter-agency collaboration are beyond the domain of the individual practitioner and agency, some suggestions are offered for strategies which can be pursued by practitioners and agencies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , 1993 , pp. 4 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assael, H. (1969). ‘Constructive role for interorganisational conflict’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 573–581.Google Scholar
Bisno, H. (1988). Managing conflict, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Carney, T. (1989) ‘A Fresh Approach to Child Protection Practice and Legislation in Australia’ Child Abuse & Neglect, 13, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Community Services Victoria, Annual Report 1991-1992.Google Scholar
Dingwall, R., Eekelaar, J. & Murray, T. (1983). The protection of children, state intervention and family life, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emery, F. & Trist, E. (1965). ‘The causal texture of organizational environments’, Human Relations, 18(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelhor, D. & Zellman, G. (1991) ‘Flexible reporting options for skilled child abuse professionals’, Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 335–341.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. & Birchall, E. (1992). Coordination and child protection: a review of the literature, Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hudson, B. (1987). ‘Collaboration in social welfare: a framework for analysis’, Policy and Politics, 15(3), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, N. (1985) The Politics of Child Abuse, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scott, D., Lindsay, J. & Jackson, A. (1992) ‘The child protection case conference: juggling rights, risks and responsibilities’, Paper presented at the International Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect, Chicago, September 1992.Google Scholar