Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:27:21.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Female genital mutilation: Challenges for child welfare in an Australian context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Ian Patrick  and
Anne Markiewicz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the challenges facing the child welfare system in general, and child protection practice in particular, in responding to female genital mutilation (FGM) in an Australian context. Policy and programmatic responses to FGM are analysed to identify how child welfare concerns may be addressed in a culturally sensitive manner. PGM is depicted as a multi-dimensional phenomenon, related to a complex of inter-connected cultural, social, economic, religious, gender and migration issues. An appropriate response is one that acknowledges these antecedents through the utilisation of a holistic, multi-disciplinary approach. Legal and child protection responses to FGM are inadequate if operating in isolation and are most effective as adjuncts to community development strategies that are aimed at education, information dissemination and consciousness raising among affected communities. More work needs to be undertaken to develop frameworks for practitioners in a cross-cultural context, particularly in the light of continued settlement within Australia of migrant and refugee communities from countries with different child-rearing practices and beliefs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 2000 , pp. 14 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboud, P. & Johnson, P. 1994, ‘On Female Genital Mutilation’, On the Level, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
Adams, C. & Gilbert, J. 1998, ‘Providing effective counselling services to Australia’s ethnic minority groups’, Australian Social Work, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 33–39.Google Scholar
Adamson, F. 1998, Female Genital Mutilation: A Counselling Guide for Professionals, Forward, London.Google Scholar
Aldeeb Abu-Sahlieh, S.A. 1994, ‘To Mutilate in the Name of Jehovah or Allah: Legitimisation of Male and Female Circumcision’, Medicine and Law, Vol. 13 No. 7–8, pp. 575–622.Google Scholar
Al Naggar, A.R. 1995, Female Circumcision and Religion. Translation of a Communication presented to the Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices, Nairobi, 12 July.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics 1998, ‘Female Genital Mutilation’, Pediatrics, Vol. 102 No. 1, pp. 153–157.Google Scholar
American Medical Association 1995, ‘Female Genital Mutilation’, The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 274 No. 21, pp. 1714–1717.Google Scholar
Baker, C.A., Gilson, O.J., VUL M.D. & Curet, L.B. 1993, ‘Female Circumcision: Obstetric Issues’, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 169, pp. 1616–1618.Google Scholar
Batrouney, T. 1991, Selected African Communities in Melbourne: Their Characteristics and Settlement Needs, Bureau of Immigration Research, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Black, J.A. & Debelle, G.D. 1995, ‘Female Genital Mutilation in Britain, British Medical Journal, Vol. 310, pp. 1590–1592.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979, The Ecology of Human Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
Buechler, Z. & Talarico, J. 1998, Breaking the Cultural Barriers: Somali Women, Northern Area Mental Health Service, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Buhagiar, L.C. 1997, ‘Criminalising Female Genital Mutilation in Canada: the Excision of Multiculturalism’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 184–186.Google Scholar
Cox, D. 1996, Understanding Australian Settlement Services, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
DHS (Department of Human Services) 1997(a), Family and Reproductive Rights Education Program (Project Document).Google Scholar
DHS (Department of Human Services) 1997(b), Female Genital Mutilation and Child Protection: Interim Practice Guidelines Draft, DHS, Melbourne.Google Scholar
DIMA (Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs) 1997, Refugee and Humanitarian Issues: Australia’s Response, DIMA, Canberra.Google Scholar
Dorkenoo, E. 1996, ‘Combating Female Genital Mutilation: An Agenda for the Next Decade’, World Health Statistical Quarterly, Vol. 49, pp. 142–147.Google Scholar
Dorkenoo, E. 1997, Strategic Response to the Prevention and Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation in the State of Victoria, Australia, Department of Human Services, Melbourne, unpublished.Google Scholar
Dorkenoo, E. & Elworthy, S. 1994, Female Genital Mutilation: Proposals for Change, Minority Rights Group International, London.Google Scholar
Dorward, D. 1998, Cultural Practice, Law and Reproductive Health: Issues relating to Female Genital Mutilation, La Trobe University, Bundoora.Google Scholar
Elchalal, U. 1997, ‘Ritualistic Female Genital Mutilation: Current Status and Future Outlook’, Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, Vol. 52 No. 10, pp. 643–651.Google Scholar
English, D. & Pecora, P. 1994, ‘Risk Assessment as a Practice Method in Child Protective Services’, Child Welfare, Vol. 73 No.5, pp. 451–473.Google Scholar
Eyega, Z. & Cormeely, E. 1997, ‘Facts and Fiction Regarding Female Circumcision/Female Genital Mutilation: A Pilot Study in New York City’, Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 174–8&187.Google Scholar
Family Law Council 1994, Female Genital Mutilation: A Report to the Attorney-General, Family Law Council, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gallard, C. 1995, ‘Female Genital Mutilation in France’, British Medical Journal, Vol. 310, pp. 1592–3.Google Scholar
Garbarino, J. 1982, Children and Families in the Social Environment, Aldine, NY.Google Scholar
Gibeau, AM. 1998, ‘Female Genital Mutilation: When a Cultural Practice Generates Clinical and Ethical Dilemmas’, Journal of Obstetric and Gynecological Neo-Natal Nursing, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 85–91.Google Scholar
Hartley, R. & McDonald, P. 1994, ‘The Many Faces of Families’, Family Matters, No. 37, April, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Hosken, F. 1993, The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females, Fourth Revised Edition, WIN NEWS, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. 1995, ‘Female Genital Mutilation: The Complementary Role of Education and Legislation in Combating the Practice in Australia’, Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 3, pp. 202–210.Google Scholar
Ierodiaconou, M. 1995, “Listento Us!’ Female Genital Mutilation, Feminism and the Law in Australia”, Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 562–587.Google Scholar
Junankar, P.N., Pope, D., Kapuscinski, C., Ma, G. & Mudd, W., 1993, Recent Immigrants and Housing, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Kiragu, K. 1995, ‘Female Genital Mutilation: A Reproductive Health Concern’, Population Reports, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Knight, R., Hotchin, A. & Bayly, C. 1999, ‘Female Genital Mutilation – Experience of the Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 50–54.Google Scholar
Korbin, J. 1981, Child Abuse and Neglect: Cross Cultural Perspectives, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Liverani, M.R. 1994a, ‘Legal Penalties Not the Right Way to Go Says the Ecumenical Migration Centre’, Law Society Journal, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 70–71.Google Scholar
Liverani, M.R. 1994b, ‘Law Society Unequivocal on Female Genital Mutilation’, Law Society Journal, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 68–69.Google Scholar
Maggi, A. 1995, Beyond the Tradition: A Study into the Health Needs of Refugee Women from the Horn of Africa (draft report).Google Scholar
Marshall, N. 1994, ‘Legal Penalties Not the Right Way to Go Says the Ecumenical Migration Centre’, Law Society Journal, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 70–71.Google Scholar
Mason, J. 1993 (Ed.), Child Welfare Policy: Critical Australian Perspectives, Hale and Iremonger, Sydney.Google Scholar
Morris, R. 1996 ‘The Culture of Female Circumcision’, Advances in Nursing Science, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 43–53.Google Scholar
Munro, M., Rule, N. & Salvo, L., 1992 Life on Hold. Pilot Project Researching Refugees who Access Emergency Relief at Melbourne City Mission, North West Region, Melbourne (unpublished).Google Scholar
Nkrumah, J. 1995, ‘FGM: Breaking the Silence’, Infocus, Vol. 18 No. 5, p. 17.Google Scholar
Nyinah, S. 1997, ‘Cultural Practices in Ghana’, World Health, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 22–24.Google Scholar
Ortiz, E.T. 1998, ‘Female Genital Mutilation and Public Health: Lessons from the British Experience’, Health Care for Women International, Vol. 19, pp. 119–129.Google Scholar
Owen, E. & Pritchard, J. (eds.) 1993, Ch. 6 ‘Preventing Female Genital Mutilation, A Practical, Multidisciplinary Approach’, Good Practice in Child Protection, A Manual for Professionals, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.Google Scholar
Paniagua, F. 1998, ‘General Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Multicultural Groups’, in Assessing and Treating Culturally Diverse Clients: A Practical Guide, 2 nd Ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Queensland Law Reform Commission 1994, Female Genital Mutilation, Report No. 47, QLRC, Brisbane.Google Scholar
RACOG (The Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) 1997, Female Genital Mutilation: Information for Australian Health Professionals, RACOG, East Melbourne.Google Scholar
Ruzzene, N. 1998, ‘Language experience: The forgotten dimension in cross-cultural social work?’, Australian Social Work, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
Schinella, A. & Aboud, P. 1994, ‘Talking with Meriem Idris’, On the Level, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar
Scott, D. & O’Neil, D. 1996, Beyond Child Rescue: Developing Family-Centred Practice at St Luke’s, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards.Google Scholar
Ssali, T.S. 1998, ‘Best Practice in Promoting Mental Well-Being Amongst Hom of Africa Refugee Women and Youth, Migration Action, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
Toubia, N. 1993, Female Genital Mutilation: A Call for Global Action, Second Edition, RAINBO, New York.Google Scholar
Toubia, N. 1994, ‘Female Circumcision as a Public Health Issue’, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 331 No. 11, pp. 712–716.Google Scholar
Vivianl, N., Coughlan, S. & Rowland, T. 1993, Indochinese in Australia: The Issues of Unemployment and Residential Concentration, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Walker, A. & Pratibha, P. 1993, Warrior Marks, Johnathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
Webb, E. & Hartley, B. 1994, ‘Female Genital Mutilation: A Dilemma in Child Protection’, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Vol. 70, pp. 441–444.Google Scholar
WIN News 1994, ‘Training of Trainers Program for Somali Women in the Netherlands’, WIN News, Vol. 20 No. 3, p.32.Google Scholar
WIN News 1997, ‘Sweden: Mother and Child Health Care – Female Genital Mutilation’, WIN News, Vol. 23 No. 2, p. 50.Google Scholar
WIN News 1998, ‘Commission for the Abolishment of Sexual Mutilations’, WIN News, Vol. 24 No. 2, p. 46.Google Scholar
World Health Organization 1996a, Islamic Ruling on Male and Female Circumcision, WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Alexandria.Google Scholar
World Health Organization 1996b, Female Genital Mutilation: Report of a WHO Technical Working Group, Geneva, 17–19 July 1995, WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization 1996c, Female Genital Mutilation: Information Kit, WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization 1997, Female Genital Mutilation: A Joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA Statement, WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization 1998, Female Genital Mutilation: An Overview, WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar