Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:21:19.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A checklist for organisations working with fathers using the non-deficit approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Andrew King ,
Steve Sweeney  and
Ross Fletcher
Andrew King
Affiliation:
UnilingCare Burnside, PO Box 6866, Parramatta NSW 2150, Email: aking@burnside.org.au
Steve Sweeney
Affiliation:
UnilingCare Burnside, PO Box 6866, Parramatta NSW 2150, Email: aking@burnside.org.au
Ross Fletcher
Affiliation:
UnilingCare Burnside, PO Box 6866, Parramatta NSW 2150, Email: aking@burnside.org.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following on from the article appearing in Children Australia Vol 30 No 2 (King 2005), this short paper develops a checklist for organisations working with fathers for assessing the programs they provide to men. The checklist uses four categories – environment, language, initial contact and marketing, and service provision – to assess their programs’ strengths and weaknesses.

The paper provides an opportunity for organisations to benchmark their approach in working with male service users and provides guidance on how program delivery can be improved.

Type
Focus on practice
Information
Children Australia , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , 2005 , pp. 32 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hawkins, A.J. & Dollahite, D.C. (1997) Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives, Sage: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
King, A. (2000) ‘Working with fathers: The non-deficit perspective’, Children Australia, Vol. 25, No. 3, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (2005) ‘The ‘quiet revolution’ amongst men: Developing the practice of working with men in family relationships’, Children Australia, Vol. 30, No. 2, 33–37).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, C. & Rich, K. (2002) Evaluation of the Men and Family Relationships Initiative – Final and Supplementary Report, Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Services, Canberra.Google Scholar