Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T08:30:56.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

German Parliamentary and National Aims in 1848–49: A Legacy Reassessed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Erich Hahn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review-Article
Information
Central European History , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 287 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Langewiesche, Dieter, “Die Anfänge der deutschen Parteien: Partei, Fraktion und Verein in der Revolution von 1848–49,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 4 (1978): 324–61Google Scholar, confirms Botzenhart's views about the effectiveness of the caucus system in Frankfurt. He also stresses that before and after 1848 moderate liberals were prejudiced against extraparliamentary party organizations, which they associated with radicalism.

2. Krieger, Leonard, The German Idea of Freedom: History of a Political Tradition (Boston, 1957).Google Scholar

3. Namier, Lewis, 1848: The Revolution of the Intellectuals (London, 1946).Google Scholar

4. Deutscher Bundestag, Stenographischer Bericht, Mar. 29, 1979, pp. 1159–60. In a similar article Carstens notes in passing that the Frankfurt Constitution was intended for a unified Germany, Die Zeit (Canada edition), Mar. 30, 1979, p. 22.