Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T17:06:57.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ross procedure performed in the setting of congenitally bifoliate aortic valve with anomalous right coronary artery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2005

Masayuki Morikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Ko Bando
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan
Shinji Sato
Affiliation:
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Abstract

We treated successfully using the Ross procedure a 14-year old with a congenitally stenotic bifoliate aortic valve associated with anomalous origin of the right coronary artery. The anomalous artery arose from the same aortic sinus that gave rise to the main stem of the left coronary artery, and reached the right atrioventricular groove by traversing the tissue plane between the aortic root and the subpulmonary infundibulum. Both coronary arteries were reimplanted using a single arterial button.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schang SJ, Pepine CJ, Bemiller CR. Anomalous coronary artery origin and bicuspid aortic valve. Vasc Surg 1975; 9: 6772.Google Scholar
Palomo AR, Schrager BR, Chahine RA. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the ascending aorta high above the left posterior sinus of Valsalva of a bicuspid aortic valve. Am Heart J 1985; 109: 902904.Google Scholar
Aoyagi S, Suzuki S, Kosuga K, Ohishi K. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Kurume Med J 1991; 38: 199202.Google Scholar
Turrentine MW, Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Bills RG, Brown JW. Biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: S356S360.Google Scholar
Elkins RC, Lane MM, McCue C. Ross operation in children: late results. J Heart Valve Dis 2001; 10: 736741.Google Scholar
Laforest I, Dumesnil JG, Briand M, Cartier PC, Pibarot P. Hemodynamic performance at rest and during exercise after aortic valve replacement: comparison of pulmonary autografts versus aortic homografts. Circulation 2002; 106: I57I62.Google Scholar
Doty DB. Anomalous origin of the left circumflex coronary artery associated with bicuspid aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122: 842843.Google Scholar
Mwambu TP, Cherian VK, Sankar MN, et al. Reimplantation of the two coronary ostia as a single button in Ross procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 2002; 11: 624626.Google Scholar