Silvetti, MS, Drago, F, Grutter, G, De Santis, A, Di Ciommo, V, Ravà, L. Twenty years of paediatric cardiac pacing: 515 pacemakers and 480 leads implanted in 292 patients. Europace
2006; 8: 530–536.
Silvetti, MS, Drago, F, Di Carlo, D, Placidi, S, Brancaccio, G, Carotti, A. Cardiac pacing in paediatric patients with congenital heart defects: transvenous or epicardial?
2013; 15: 1280–1286.
Crossley, GH, Chen, J, Choucair, W, et al. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol
2009; 54: 2012–2019.
Mabo, P, Victor, F, Bazin, P, et al. A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (the COMPAS trial). Eur Heart J
2012; 33: 1105–1111.
Varma, N, Epstein, AE, Irimpen, A, Schweikert, R, Love, C; TRUST Investigators. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-t Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) Trial. Circulation
2010; 122: 325–332.
Crossley, GH, Boyle, A, Vitense, H, Chang, Y, Mead, RH; CONNECT Investigators. The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. J Am Coll Cardiol
2011; 57: 1181–1189.
Lunati, M, Gasparini, M, Santini, M, et al. Follow-up of CRT-ICD: implications for the use of remote follow-up systems. Data from the Insync ICD Italian Registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
2008; 31: 38–46.
Marzegalli, M, Lunati, M, Landolina, M, et al. Remote monitoring of CRT-ICD: the multicenter Italian CareLink evaluation – ease of use, acceptance, and organizational implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
2008; 31: 1259–1264.
Santini, M, Ricci, RP, Lunati, M, et al. Remote monitoring of patients with biventricular defibrillators through the CareLink system improves clinical management of arrhythmias and heart failure episodes. J Interv Card Electrophysiol
2009; 24: 53–61.
Landolina, M, Perego, GB, Lunati, M, et al. Remote monitoring reduces healthcare use and improves quality of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: the evolution of management strategies of heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators (EVOLVO) study. Circulation
2012; 125: 2985–2992.
Furukawa, T, Maggi, R, Bertolone, C, et al. Effectiveness of remote monitoring in the management of syncope and palpitations. Europace
2011; 13: 431–437.
Raatikainen, MJ, Uusimaa, P, van Ginneken, MM, Janssen, JP, Linnaluoto, M. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up. Europace
2008; 10: 1145–1151.
Burri, H, Senouf, D. Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace
2009; 11: 701–709.
Saxon, LA, Hayes, DL, Gilliam, FR, et al. Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implantation and influence of remote device follow-up: the ALTITUDE survival study. Circulation
2010; 122: 2359–2367.
Ricci, RP, Morichelli, L, D’Onofrio, A, et al. Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry. Europace
2013; 15: 970–977.
Spencker, S, Coban, N, Koch, L, Schirdewan, A, Muller, D. Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure. Europace
2009; 11: 483–488.
Varma, N, Michalski, J, Epstein, AE, Schweikert, R. Automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead and generator performance: the Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
2010; 3: 428–436.
Halimi, F, Cantù, F. Remote monitoring for active cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a European survey. Europace
2010; 12: 1778–1780.
Dubner, S, Auricchio, A, Steinberg, JS, et al. ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Europace
2012; 14: 278–293.
Malloy, LE, Gingerich, J, Olson, MD, Atkins, DL. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable devices in the pediatric population improves detection of adverse events. Pediatr Cardiol
2014; 35: 301–306.
Zartner, PA, Toussaint-Goetz, N, Photiadis, J, Wiebe, W, Schneider, MB. Telemonitoring with implantable electronic devices in young patients with congenital heart diseases. Europace
2012; 14: 1030–1037.
De Asmundis, C, Ricciardi, D, Namdar, M, Chierchia, GB, Sarkozy, A, Brudaga, P. Role of home monitoring in children with implantable cardioverter defibrillators for Brugada syndrome. Europace
2013; 15 (Suppl 1): i17–i25.
LaPage, MJ, von Alvensleben, J, Dick, M, Serwer, G, Bradley, DJ. Utility of intrathoracic impedance monitoring in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
2013; 36: 994–999.
Ricci, RP, Morichelli, L. Workflow time and patient satisfaction from the perspective of home monitoring. Europace
2013; 15 (Suppl 1): i49–i53.
Movsowitz, C, Mittal, S. Remote patient management using implantable devices. J Interv Card Electrophysiol
2011; 31: 81–90.
Cronin, EM, Ching, EA, Varma, N, Martin, DO, Wilkoff, BL, Lindsay, BD. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis. Heart Rhythm
2012; 9: 1947–1951.
Cronin, EM, Varma, N. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implanted electronic devices: a paradigm shift for the 21st century. Expert Rev Med Devices
2012; 9: 367–376.
Ricci, RP, Morichelli, L, Santini, M. Home monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization. Europace
2008; 10: 164–170.