Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Psychometric testing of the developmental care scale for neonates with congenital heart disease

  • Sara Arter (a1), Elaine Miller (a1), Tamilyn Bakas (a1) and David S Cooper (a2)

Abstract

Purpose:

Developmental care of neonates with CHD is essential for proper neurodevelopment. Measurement of developmental care specific to these neonates is needed to ensure consistent implementation within and across cardiac ICUs. The purpose of this study was to psychometrically test the Developmental Care Scale for Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease, which measures the quality of developmental care provided by bedside nurses to neonates in the cardiac ICU.

Methods:

Psychometric testing was conducted with 119 cardiac ICU nurses to provide evidence of internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Participants were predominantly young (median = 32 years), white (90%) females (93%) with bachelor’s degrees (78%) and a median experience in the cardiac ICU of 7 years.

Results:

Evidence of internal consistency reliability (α =.89) was provided with corrected item-total correlations ranging from .31 to .77. Exploratory factor analysis provided evidence of construct validity as a unidimensional scale, as well as a multidimensional scale consisting of four subscales: creating the external environment, assessment of family well-being, caregiver activities toward the neonate, and basic human needs.

Conclusions:

Evidence of reliability and validity of the 31-item Developmental Care Scale for Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease was established with nurses caring for neonates in the cardiac ICU. This instrument will serve as a valuable outcome measure tasked with improving developmental care performance and makes it possible to identify relationships between developmental care performance and neonatal neurodevelopmental outcomes in future research.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: S. Arter, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, 3110 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA. Phone: +15135582610; Fax: +15135561105; E-mail: burkesj@ucmail.uc.edu

References

Hide All
1. Center for Disease Control. Congenital Heart Defects: Data and Statistics 2015. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/heartdefects/data.html
2. Oster, ME, Lee, KA, Honein, MA, et al. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e1502e1508.
3. Stout, KK, Daniels, CJ, Aboulhosn, JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 73: e81e192.
4. Gaynor, WJ, Stopp, C, Wypij, D, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after cardiac surgery in infancy. Pediatrics 2015; 135: 816825.
5. National Council on Child Development. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Excessive stress disrupts the architecture of the developing brain: Working paper 3. 2014. Retrieved from http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu
6. Marino, BS, Lipkin, PH, Newburger, JW, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management. Circulation 2012; 126: 11431172.
7. Coughlin, ME. Transformative Nursing in the NICU. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2014.
8. Burke, SJ. Systematic review of developmental care interventions in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit since 2006. J Child Health Care 2018; 22: 269286.
9. Sood, E, Berends, WM, Butcher, JL, et al. Developmental care in North American pediatric cardiac intensive care units: survey of current practices. Adv Neo Car 2016; 16: 211219.
10. National Association of Neonatal Nurses. Self-assessment for the Neonatal Developmental Care Specialist Designation Examination. Retrieved from http://nann.org/uploads/Education/Dev_Care_Specialist_self-assessment_test-FINAL_10-19-10.pdf
11. Gibbins, S, Coughlin, M, Hoath, S. Quality indicators for developmental care: using the universe of developmental care model as an exemplar for change. In: Kenner, C, McGrath, J (eds.) Developmental Care of Newborns and Infants: A Guide for Health Professionals, 2nd edn. National Association of Neonatal Nurses, Glenview, IL, 2010: 4359.
12. Burke, SJ, Miller, E, Bakas, T, et al. Content validity of the developmental care scale for neonates with congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2019; 29: 4853.
13. Pannucci, CJ, Wilkins, EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 619625.
14. Tinsley, HE, Tinsley, DJ. Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. J Counsel Psych 1987; 34: 414424.
15. Tabachnick, BG, Fidell, LS. Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th edn. Pearson, Boston, MA, 2013.
16. Aita, M, Snider, L. The art of developmental care in the NICU: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2003; 41: 223232.
17. Smith, K, Buehler, D, Als, H. NIDCAP Nursery Certification Program: Nursery Assessment Manual, 2011. Retrieved from http://nidcap.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/NNCP_Nursery_Assessment_Manual_4_8_13.pdf

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed