Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T17:16:57.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-term observations of rheumatic carditis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Kalim-ud-Din Aziz ,
L. Cheema  and
A.D. Memon
Kalim-ud-Din Aziz*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Karachi
L. Cheema
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Karachi
A.D. Memon
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Karachi
*
Professor Kalim-ud-Din Aziz, Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National lnstitute of Cardiovascular Disease, Rafiqui (H.G.), Shaheed Road, Karachi, Pakistan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A total of 246 consecutive patients were seen with the diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever (and/or rheumatic heart disease) and were followed for 587.7 patient years. The episode of acute rheumatic fever was the first in 64 of these patients, whereas recurrent acute rheumatic fever was seen in 26 and the other 156 patients had chronic rheumatic carditis. At presentation, those suffering an initial attack had less frequent and less severe carditis when compared to those suffering recurrent infection (p<0.05). Improvement in carditis during follow-up was noted in those having an initial attack (p<0.1), while deterioration occurred following recurrent infection (p<0.01), and no change was noted for those with chronic infection. Recurrences of acute rheumatic fever were most frequent in those presenting with their initial infection (21%) or reinfection (35%), and dropout from follow-up was highest in the group with first infection (38%) compared to those with recurrent infection (15%) and chronic carditis (25%). Non-recognition of the first episode of acute rheumatic fever and failure of secondary prophylaxis were found to be the major contributors to the observed increased pool of recurrent and chronic rheumatic heart disease. We conclude that, in the absence of programmed primary prophylaxis of acute rheumatic fever, the best chance of controlling the progression of carditis or affecting cure is to recognize the first episode ofacute rheumatic fever and then ensure strict adherence to secondary prophylaxis. Since the prognosis of recurrent carditis is poor, the best management of moderate to severe recurrent carditis is early reparative valvar surgery wherever possible.

Keywords

Rheumatic fevercarditisvalvular disease
Type
World Forum for Pediatric Cardiology Symposium on Rheumatic Fever
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1992 , pp. 254 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Disciascio, G, Taranta, A. Rheumatic fever in children. Am Heart J 1980; 99: 635–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Agarwal, BL. Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease in Developing Countries. Ghulab Vaziranifor Arnold publisher (India) Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 1988, pp 12–21.Google Scholar
3. Padmavati, S. Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in India I. Rheumatic Heart Diseases. Circulation 1962; 25:703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Report of a WHO study group Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. World Health Organization, Technical report series 1988; 764: 7.Google Scholar
5. Robinson, RD, Sultana, S, Abbasi, AS. Acute rheumatic fever in Karachi, Pakistan. Am J Cardiol 1966; 18: 548–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Rahimtoola, R, Shafqat, H, Ramzan, A. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic carditis in children. Pakistan Heart J 1980; 13: 2–9.Google Scholar
7. Sanyal, SK, Thapar, MK, Ahmed, SH. The initial attack of acute rheumatic fever during childhood in North India: A prospective study of the clinical profile. Circulation 1974; 49: 7–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Majeed, SK, Khan, A, Dabbagh, M. Acute rheumatic fever during childhood in Kuwait. The mild nature of initial attack, Trop Paediatr 1981; 1: 13–20.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Agarwal, BL, Agarwal, R. Rheumatic fever, clinical profile of the initial attack in India. Bull WHO 1986; 64: 573–578.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Markowitz, M, Kuttner, AG, Gordis, L. Rheumatic Fever Diagnosis Management and Prevention. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia and London, 1967, p 41.Google Scholar
11. Feinstein, ARSpagnuolo, M. The clinical patterns of acuter heumatic fever. A reappraisal. Medicine 1962; 41: 279–305.Google Scholar
12. Mayer, FE, Doyle, EF, Herrera, L. Declining severity of first attack of rheumatic fever. Am J Dis Child 1963; 105:146–151.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Majeed, HA, Yousof, AM, Khuffash, FA. The natural history of acute rheumatic fever in Kuwait a prospective six year follow-up report. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 361–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Sanyal, SK, Berry, AM, Duggal, S. Sequelae of initial attack of acute rheumatic fever in children from North India. Circulation 1982; 65: 375–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Tompkins, DG, Boxerbaum, B, Libman, J. Long-term prognosis of rheumatic fever patients receiving regular intramuscular benzathine penicillin. Circulation 1972; 45: 543–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Thomas, GT. Five year follow-up on patients with rheumatic fever treated by bed rest, steroids or salicylates. Br Med J 1961; 1: 1635–1639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Massel, BF, Jhaveri, S, Czoniezer, G. Therapy and other factors influencing the course of rheumatic heart disease. Circulation 1959; 70: 737–741.Google Scholar
18. Feinstein, AR, Wood, HF, Spagnuolo, M. Rheumatic fever in children and adolescents. VII cardiac changes and sequelae. Ann Intern Med 1964; 60: 87–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Bland, EF and Jones, TD. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic fever disease. A twenty year report on 1,000 patients followed since childhood. Circulation 1951; 4: 836–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Ad-Hoc committee to revise the Jones criteria (Modified) of the council on rheumatic fever and congenital heart disease of the American Heart Association; Jones criteria (revised for guidance in the diagnosis of rheumatic fever). Circulation 1984; 203A.Google Scholar
21. Majeed, HA, Shaltout, A, Yousof, AM. Recurrences of acute rheumatic fever: A prospective study of 79 episodes. Am J Dis Child 1984; 138: 341–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Marienfeld, CT, Robins, M, Sandidge, RF. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease among U.S. College freshman 1956–1960. Prevalence and prophylaxis. Public Health Rep 1964; 79: 789–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Klienberg, E, Feinstein, AR, Wood, HF. Rheumatic fever in children and adolescents. Relation of the rheumatic fever recurrence rate per streptococcal infection to preexisting clinical features of the patients. Ann Int Med 1964; 60: 58–62.Google Scholar
24. Report of a WHO study group. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. World Health Organization Technical report series Geneva 1988; 764: 20.Google Scholar
25. Reale, A, Colella, C, Bruno, AM. Mitral stenosis in childhood. Clinical and therapeutic aspects. Am Heart J 1963; 66: 15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Roy, SB, Bahatia, ML, Lazaro, EJ. Juvenile mitral stenosis in India. Lancet 1963; 2: 1193–1196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed